使用剂量指数预测COPD患者健康状况的变化:一项前瞻性队列研究

Myrte Rolink, Wouter van Dijk, Saskia van den Haak-Rongen, Willem Pieters, Tjard Schermer, Lisette van den Bemt
{"title":"使用剂量指数预测COPD患者健康状况的变化:一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Myrte Rolink,&nbsp;Wouter van Dijk,&nbsp;Saskia van den Haak-Rongen,&nbsp;Willem Pieters,&nbsp;Tjard Schermer,&nbsp;Lisette van den Bemt","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2013.00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should not be based on the level of airflow limitation alone. A multicomponent index such as the DOSE index (dyspnoea score (D), level of airflow obstruction (O), current smoking status (S), and exacerbations (E)) has the potential to predict important future outcomes in patients with COPD more effectively than the forced expiratory volume in one second. Health status deterioration should be prevented in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate whether the DOSE index can predict which patients are at risk of a clinically relevant change in health status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was performed using data from primary and secondary care. The DOSE score was determined at baseline and the 2-year change in the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) score was calculated. Linear regression analysis was performed for the effect of a high DOSE score (≥ 4) on the change in CCQ score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 209 patients (112 patients from primary care). Overall, a high DOSE score was a significant predictor of a change in CCQ score after 2 years (0.41, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.70), particularly in primary care patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A DOSE score of ≥ 4 has the ability to identify COPD patients with a greater risk of future worsening in health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00033","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the DOSE index to predict changes in health status of patients with COPD: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Myrte Rolink,&nbsp;Wouter van Dijk,&nbsp;Saskia van den Haak-Rongen,&nbsp;Willem Pieters,&nbsp;Tjard Schermer,&nbsp;Lisette van den Bemt\",\"doi\":\"10.4104/pcrj.2013.00033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should not be based on the level of airflow limitation alone. A multicomponent index such as the DOSE index (dyspnoea score (D), level of airflow obstruction (O), current smoking status (S), and exacerbations (E)) has the potential to predict important future outcomes in patients with COPD more effectively than the forced expiratory volume in one second. Health status deterioration should be prevented in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate whether the DOSE index can predict which patients are at risk of a clinically relevant change in health status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was performed using data from primary and secondary care. The DOSE score was determined at baseline and the 2-year change in the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) score was calculated. Linear regression analysis was performed for the effect of a high DOSE score (≥ 4) on the change in CCQ score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 209 patients (112 patients from primary care). Overall, a high DOSE score was a significant predictor of a change in CCQ score after 2 years (0.41, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.70), particularly in primary care patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A DOSE score of ≥ 4 has the ability to identify COPD patients with a greater risk of future worsening in health status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Care Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00033\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Care Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的严重程度不应仅基于气流限制的水平。多组分指数,如DOSE指数(呼吸困难评分(D)、气流阻塞水平(O)、当前吸烟状况(S)和恶化情况(E)),比一秒用力呼气量更有效地预测COPD患者重要的未来结局。COPD患者应预防健康状况恶化。目的:探讨剂量指数是否可以预测哪些患者有临床相关健康状况改变的风险。方法:采用来自初级和二级保健的数据进行前瞻性队列研究。在基线时确定DOSE评分,并计算临床COPD问卷(CCQ)评分的2年变化。采用线性回归分析高DOSE评分(≥4)对CCQ评分变化的影响。结果:研究人群包括209例患者(112例来自初级保健)。总体而言,高剂量评分是2年后CCQ评分变化的重要预测因子(0.41,95% CI 0.13至0.70),特别是在初级保健患者中。结论:剂量评分≥4能够识别COPD患者未来健康状况恶化的风险更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using the DOSE index to predict changes in health status of patients with COPD: a prospective cohort study.

Background: The severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should not be based on the level of airflow limitation alone. A multicomponent index such as the DOSE index (dyspnoea score (D), level of airflow obstruction (O), current smoking status (S), and exacerbations (E)) has the potential to predict important future outcomes in patients with COPD more effectively than the forced expiratory volume in one second. Health status deterioration should be prevented in COPD patients.

Aims: To investigate whether the DOSE index can predict which patients are at risk of a clinically relevant change in health status.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed using data from primary and secondary care. The DOSE score was determined at baseline and the 2-year change in the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) score was calculated. Linear regression analysis was performed for the effect of a high DOSE score (≥ 4) on the change in CCQ score.

Results: The study population consisted of 209 patients (112 patients from primary care). Overall, a high DOSE score was a significant predictor of a change in CCQ score after 2 years (0.41, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.70), particularly in primary care patients.

Conclusions: A DOSE score of ≥ 4 has the ability to identify COPD patients with a greater risk of future worsening in health status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Primary Care Respiratory Journal PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Management, morbidity and mortality of COPD during an 11-year period: an observational retrospective epidemiological register study in Sweden (PATHOS). Chronic disease co-morbidity of asthma and unscheduled asthma care among adults: results of the national telephone health interview survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 and 2010. Transgenerational occurrence of allergic disease and autoimmunity: general practice-based epidemiological research. Are GOLD ABCD groups better associated with health status and costs than GOLD 1234 grades? A cross-sectional study. Indolent pneumonia in a pregnant recent immigrant from Ethiopia: think TB.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1