中国大陆儿童肿瘤护理质量指标的共识:德尔菲法与层次分析法。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-15 DOI:10.1177/27527530211068727
Mengxue He, Hong Lu, Nanping Shen, Xinyi Wu, Guomei Shen, Xuezhen Zhou, Min Shen, Lin Mo, Hsu Lily
{"title":"中国大陆儿童肿瘤护理质量指标的共识:德尔菲法与层次分析法。","authors":"Mengxue He,&nbsp;Hong Lu,&nbsp;Nanping Shen,&nbsp;Xinyi Wu,&nbsp;Guomei Shen,&nbsp;Xuezhen Zhou,&nbsp;Min Shen,&nbsp;Lin Mo,&nbsp;Hsu Lily","doi":"10.1177/27527530211068727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Because routine nursing quality indicators are not suitable to evaluate pediatric oncology nursing care, this study aimed to identify a set of quality indicators for pediatric oncology nursing care in mainland China. <b>Method:</b> This prospective investigation utilized a modified Delphi technique and an analytic hierarchy process. A survey questionnaire was developed using a literature review and semi-structured interviews. Fifteen invited experts evaluated the importance of potential indicators through three rounds of Delphi survey by email in 2018. The importance weight of each indicator was identified through analytic hierarchy process. <b>Results:</b> In the Delphi survey, the average authoritative coefficient was 0.93-0.96 for each round of the inquiry. After three rounds of survey, 29 quality indicators were identified as important nursing outcomes for assessing the quality of pediatric oncology nursing care in mainland China. The importance rating mean score of indicators ranged between 4.67 and 5.00 on a 5-point scale, and the variation coefficient ranged between 0 and 0.19. Expert-assigned indicator importance weight varied between 0.0040 and 0.0870. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study identified an indicator system with 29 nursing-sensitive quality indicators that may represent potential indicator candidates for quality assessment of pediatric oncology nursing practice in mainland China.</p>","PeriodicalId":29692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus on Quality Indicators for Pediatric Oncology Nursing Care in Mainland China: A Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process.\",\"authors\":\"Mengxue He,&nbsp;Hong Lu,&nbsp;Nanping Shen,&nbsp;Xinyi Wu,&nbsp;Guomei Shen,&nbsp;Xuezhen Zhou,&nbsp;Min Shen,&nbsp;Lin Mo,&nbsp;Hsu Lily\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27527530211068727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Because routine nursing quality indicators are not suitable to evaluate pediatric oncology nursing care, this study aimed to identify a set of quality indicators for pediatric oncology nursing care in mainland China. <b>Method:</b> This prospective investigation utilized a modified Delphi technique and an analytic hierarchy process. A survey questionnaire was developed using a literature review and semi-structured interviews. Fifteen invited experts evaluated the importance of potential indicators through three rounds of Delphi survey by email in 2018. The importance weight of each indicator was identified through analytic hierarchy process. <b>Results:</b> In the Delphi survey, the average authoritative coefficient was 0.93-0.96 for each round of the inquiry. After three rounds of survey, 29 quality indicators were identified as important nursing outcomes for assessing the quality of pediatric oncology nursing care in mainland China. The importance rating mean score of indicators ranged between 4.67 and 5.00 on a 5-point scale, and the variation coefficient ranged between 0 and 0.19. Expert-assigned indicator importance weight varied between 0.0040 and 0.0870. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study identified an indicator system with 29 nursing-sensitive quality indicators that may represent potential indicator candidates for quality assessment of pediatric oncology nursing practice in mainland China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530211068727\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530211068727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于常规护理质量指标不适合评价儿童肿瘤护理,本研究旨在确定一套适合中国大陆地区儿童肿瘤护理的质量指标。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法和层次分析法进行前瞻性调查。采用文献综述和半结构化访谈的方法编制调查问卷。2018年,15位特邀专家通过3轮邮件德尔菲调查对潜在指标的重要性进行了评估。通过层次分析法确定了各指标的重要权重。结果:在德尔菲调查中,每轮调查的平均权威系数为0.93-0.96。经过三轮调查,确定了29项质量指标作为评估中国大陆地区儿童肿瘤护理质量的重要护理结果。在5分制中,各指标的重要性评级平均值在4.67 ~ 5.00之间,变异系数在0 ~ 0.19之间。专家分配的指标重要性权重在0.0040 ~ 0.0870之间变化。结论:本研究确定了一个包含29个护理敏感质量指标的指标体系,可作为中国大陆地区儿科肿瘤护理实践质量评估的潜在候选指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consensus on Quality Indicators for Pediatric Oncology Nursing Care in Mainland China: A Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Background: Because routine nursing quality indicators are not suitable to evaluate pediatric oncology nursing care, this study aimed to identify a set of quality indicators for pediatric oncology nursing care in mainland China. Method: This prospective investigation utilized a modified Delphi technique and an analytic hierarchy process. A survey questionnaire was developed using a literature review and semi-structured interviews. Fifteen invited experts evaluated the importance of potential indicators through three rounds of Delphi survey by email in 2018. The importance weight of each indicator was identified through analytic hierarchy process. Results: In the Delphi survey, the average authoritative coefficient was 0.93-0.96 for each round of the inquiry. After three rounds of survey, 29 quality indicators were identified as important nursing outcomes for assessing the quality of pediatric oncology nursing care in mainland China. The importance rating mean score of indicators ranged between 4.67 and 5.00 on a 5-point scale, and the variation coefficient ranged between 0 and 0.19. Expert-assigned indicator importance weight varied between 0.0040 and 0.0870. Conclusion: This study identified an indicator system with 29 nursing-sensitive quality indicators that may represent potential indicator candidates for quality assessment of pediatric oncology nursing practice in mainland China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
No Conflicting Loyalties in Parents When Their Healthy Child Donates Stem Cells to a Severely Ill Sibling: An Interview Study. Digital Stories Created by Children With Advanced Cancer. Examining Factors in the Decision to Sperm Bank by Adolescent and Young Adult Males Diagnosed With Cancer: A Review of the Literature. A Quality Approach to Blinatumomab Delivery in Pediatric Oncology: A Children's Oncology Group Study. The Use of Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Combination With Pharmacological Antiemetics to Address Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Oncology: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1