污水厂出水中的半结晶微塑料及其后处理过滤系统的去除效率

IF 7.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Water Research X Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wroa.2022.100156
Hajo Bitter , Leonie Krause , Franziska Kirchen , Thomas Fundneider , Susanne Lackner
{"title":"污水厂出水中的半结晶微塑料及其后处理过滤系统的去除效率","authors":"Hajo Bitter ,&nbsp;Leonie Krause ,&nbsp;Franziska Kirchen ,&nbsp;Thomas Fundneider ,&nbsp;Susanne Lackner","doi":"10.1016/j.wroa.2022.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous in the environment and have been found in every environmental compartment. Wastewater and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been identified as possible point sources contributing to the emission of microplastic particles (MPP) into the aquatic environment. So far, MPP in wastewater effluents have mainly been analyzed by spectroscopic methods resulting in concentrations as number per volume. In this study, we present mass concentrations in the secondary effluents of four German municipal WWTPs, removal efficiencies of seven post-treatment systems and the resulting load emissions. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was used for the analysis of semi-crystalline MPs. The concentrations of secondary effluents ranged from 0.1 to 19.6 µg L<sup>-1</sup>. Removal efficiencies &gt; 94% were found for a microfiltration membrane (MF), two cloth types of a pile cloth media filter (PCMF), a micro strainer, a discontinuous downflow granulated activated carbon filter (GAC) and a powdered activated carbon (PAC) stage with clarifier and rapid sand filtration. A rapid sand filter (RSF) at WWTP B showed a removal efficiency of 82.38%. Only a continuous upflow GAC filter at WWTP C proved to be unsuitable for MP removal with an average removal efficiency of 1.9%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52198,"journal":{"name":"Water Research X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/62/main.PMC9513168.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semi-crystalline microplastics in wastewater plant effluents and removal efficiencies of post-treatment filtration systems\",\"authors\":\"Hajo Bitter ,&nbsp;Leonie Krause ,&nbsp;Franziska Kirchen ,&nbsp;Thomas Fundneider ,&nbsp;Susanne Lackner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wroa.2022.100156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous in the environment and have been found in every environmental compartment. Wastewater and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been identified as possible point sources contributing to the emission of microplastic particles (MPP) into the aquatic environment. So far, MPP in wastewater effluents have mainly been analyzed by spectroscopic methods resulting in concentrations as number per volume. In this study, we present mass concentrations in the secondary effluents of four German municipal WWTPs, removal efficiencies of seven post-treatment systems and the resulting load emissions. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was used for the analysis of semi-crystalline MPs. The concentrations of secondary effluents ranged from 0.1 to 19.6 µg L<sup>-1</sup>. Removal efficiencies &gt; 94% were found for a microfiltration membrane (MF), two cloth types of a pile cloth media filter (PCMF), a micro strainer, a discontinuous downflow granulated activated carbon filter (GAC) and a powdered activated carbon (PAC) stage with clarifier and rapid sand filtration. A rapid sand filter (RSF) at WWTP B showed a removal efficiency of 82.38%. Only a continuous upflow GAC filter at WWTP C proved to be unsuitable for MP removal with an average removal efficiency of 1.9%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research X\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/62/main.PMC9513168.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914722000263\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research X","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914722000263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

微塑料(MPs)在环境中无处不在,在每个环境隔间中都有发现。废水和污水处理厂(WWTPs)已被确定为可能的点源,导致微塑料颗粒(MPP)排放到水生环境中。到目前为止,对废水中MPP的分析主要是通过光谱方法得出浓度,即每体积的数量。在本研究中,我们介绍了四个德国城市污水处理厂二级出水的质量浓度,七个后处理系统的去除效率以及由此产生的负荷排放。采用差示扫描量热法(DSC)分析半结晶MPs。二次出水浓度范围为0.1 ~ 19.6µg L-1。去除效率>微滤膜(MF)、堆布介质过滤器(PCMF)、微过滤器、不连续下流颗粒活性炭过滤器(GAC)和带澄清器和快速砂过滤的粉状活性炭(PAC)级的去除率为94%。在污水处理厂B采用快速砂滤池(RSF),去除率达82.38%。只有污水处理厂C的连续上流式GAC过滤器被证明不适合去除MP,平均去除率为1.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Semi-crystalline microplastics in wastewater plant effluents and removal efficiencies of post-treatment filtration systems

Microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous in the environment and have been found in every environmental compartment. Wastewater and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been identified as possible point sources contributing to the emission of microplastic particles (MPP) into the aquatic environment. So far, MPP in wastewater effluents have mainly been analyzed by spectroscopic methods resulting in concentrations as number per volume. In this study, we present mass concentrations in the secondary effluents of four German municipal WWTPs, removal efficiencies of seven post-treatment systems and the resulting load emissions. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was used for the analysis of semi-crystalline MPs. The concentrations of secondary effluents ranged from 0.1 to 19.6 µg L-1. Removal efficiencies > 94% were found for a microfiltration membrane (MF), two cloth types of a pile cloth media filter (PCMF), a micro strainer, a discontinuous downflow granulated activated carbon filter (GAC) and a powdered activated carbon (PAC) stage with clarifier and rapid sand filtration. A rapid sand filter (RSF) at WWTP B showed a removal efficiency of 82.38%. Only a continuous upflow GAC filter at WWTP C proved to be unsuitable for MP removal with an average removal efficiency of 1.9%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Research X
Water Research X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Water Research X is a sister journal of Water Research, which follows a Gold Open Access model. It focuses on publishing concise, letter-style research papers, visionary perspectives and editorials, as well as mini-reviews on emerging topics. The Journal invites contributions from researchers worldwide on various aspects of the science and technology related to the human impact on the water cycle, water quality, and its global management.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of EPS subfractions from a mixed culture predominated by partial-denitrification functional bacteria Effectiveness of cyclic treatment of municipal wastewater by Tetradesmus obliquus – Loofah biofilm, its internal community changes and potential for resource utilization Enhanced nitrogen removal for low C/N wastewater via preventing futile carbon oxidation and augmenting anammox Evaluating energy balance and environmental footprint of sludge management in BRICS countries Pharmaceuticals in raw and treated water from drinking water treatment plants nationwide: Insights into their sources and exposure risk assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1