小细胞肺癌的维持或巩固治疗:最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Seminars in oncology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.09.001
Lorenzo Belluomini , Sara Pilotto , Alice Avancini , Jessica Insolda , Marco Sposito , Jessica Menis , Chiara Ciccarese , Roberto Iacovelli , Miriam Grazia Ferrara , Michele Milella , Emilio Bria , Antonio Rossi
{"title":"小细胞肺癌的维持或巩固治疗:最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Lorenzo Belluomini ,&nbsp;Sara Pilotto ,&nbsp;Alice Avancini ,&nbsp;Jessica Insolda ,&nbsp;Marco Sposito ,&nbsp;Jessica Menis ,&nbsp;Chiara Ciccarese ,&nbsp;Roberto Iacovelli ,&nbsp;Miriam Grazia Ferrara ,&nbsp;Michele Milella ,&nbsp;Emilio Bria ,&nbsp;Antonio Rossi","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>We performed an updated meta-analysis to explore the role of maintenance therapy in SCLC. </span>Clinical trials with randomization to maintenance/consolidation (</span><em>V)</em> placebo or observation or best supportive care in SCLC, both extended and limited disease were searched from January 2009 to March 2022. The hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the relative 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted from each study. Summary HR was calculated using random- or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. A total of 9 studies were identified. Neither PFS nor OS were improved with maintenance/consolidation (PFS: random-effect; HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.71–1.21; <em>P</em>=0.10; OS: fixed-effect; HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.89–1.08; <em>P</em><span>=0.14). Among the different strategies, immunotherapy maintenance showed a significantly decreased risk of progression (</span><em>V)</em>standard of care (random-effect; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66–0.97; <em>P</em>=0.03). The current updated meta-analysis did not demonstrate a benefit of maintenance/consolidation therapy in SCLC, with only a PFS benefit for immunotherapy approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":"49 5","pages":"Pages 389-393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintenance or consolidation therapy in small-cell lung cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Belluomini ,&nbsp;Sara Pilotto ,&nbsp;Alice Avancini ,&nbsp;Jessica Insolda ,&nbsp;Marco Sposito ,&nbsp;Jessica Menis ,&nbsp;Chiara Ciccarese ,&nbsp;Roberto Iacovelli ,&nbsp;Miriam Grazia Ferrara ,&nbsp;Michele Milella ,&nbsp;Emilio Bria ,&nbsp;Antonio Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>We performed an updated meta-analysis to explore the role of maintenance therapy in SCLC. </span>Clinical trials with randomization to maintenance/consolidation (</span><em>V)</em> placebo or observation or best supportive care in SCLC, both extended and limited disease were searched from January 2009 to March 2022. The hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the relative 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted from each study. Summary HR was calculated using random- or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. A total of 9 studies were identified. Neither PFS nor OS were improved with maintenance/consolidation (PFS: random-effect; HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.71–1.21; <em>P</em>=0.10; OS: fixed-effect; HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.89–1.08; <em>P</em><span>=0.14). Among the different strategies, immunotherapy maintenance showed a significantly decreased risk of progression (</span><em>V)</em>standard of care (random-effect; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66–0.97; <em>P</em>=0.03). The current updated meta-analysis did not demonstrate a benefit of maintenance/consolidation therapy in SCLC, with only a PFS benefit for immunotherapy approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 389-393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775422000616\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775422000616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们进行了一项最新的荟萃分析,以探讨维持治疗在SCLC中的作用。从2009年1月到2022年3月,研究人员检索了SCLC中随机分配到维持/巩固(V)安慰剂或观察或最佳支持治疗的临床试验,包括扩展和有限疾病。从每项研究中提取无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的风险比(HR)和相对95%置信区间(CI)。根据纳入研究的异质性,采用随机或固定效应模型计算HR。总共确定了9项研究。PFS和OS均未因维持/巩固而改善(PFS:随机效应;人力资源0.93;95% ci 0.71-1.21;P = 0.10;操作系统:固定效果;人力资源0.98;95% ci 0.89-1.08;P = 0.14)。在不同的策略中,免疫治疗维持显示出进展风险显著降低(V)标准护理(随机效应;人力资源0.80;95% ci 0.66-0.97;P = 0.03)。当前更新的荟萃分析没有证明维持/巩固治疗对SCLC的益处,只有免疫治疗方法的PFS益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maintenance or consolidation therapy in small-cell lung cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

We performed an updated meta-analysis to explore the role of maintenance therapy in SCLC. Clinical trials with randomization to maintenance/consolidation (V) placebo or observation or best supportive care in SCLC, both extended and limited disease were searched from January 2009 to March 2022. The hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the relative 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted from each study. Summary HR was calculated using random- or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. A total of 9 studies were identified. Neither PFS nor OS were improved with maintenance/consolidation (PFS: random-effect; HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.71–1.21; P=0.10; OS: fixed-effect; HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.89–1.08; P=0.14). Among the different strategies, immunotherapy maintenance showed a significantly decreased risk of progression (V)standard of care (random-effect; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66–0.97; P=0.03). The current updated meta-analysis did not demonstrate a benefit of maintenance/consolidation therapy in SCLC, with only a PFS benefit for immunotherapy approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
期刊最新文献
Adenocarcinoma on retrorectal cystic hamartoma: An illustrative image for a very rare diagnosis. Efficacy of metformin drug in preventing metabolic syndrome associated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Screening Adherence for Second Primary Malignancies in Breast Cancer Survivors: Behaviors, Facilitators, and Barriers to Enhance Quality Care. Deep Myometrial Infiltration leads to a measurable Inflammatory Response in Endometrial Cancer. A Prospective Observational Study. Colorectal cancer in Ethiopia: Epidemiological trends, diagnostic and laboratory capacities, and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1