{"title":"钢板内固定与新一代锁定髓内钉治疗成人前臂骨干骨折的临床和影像学结果比较。","authors":"Oktay Polat, Serdar Toy","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2022.21190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare functional and radiographical outcomes following intramedullary nailing (IMN) versus plate and screw osteosynthesis in managing patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six patients (27 male, 19 female) were included in this retrospective study. Of these, 25 were treated with plate osteosynthesis and 21 with IMN. The mean age was 32.4 (range, 19-67) years in the plate group and 28.8 (range, 18-64) years in the IMN group. The mean follow-up was 22.3 (range, 12-36) months in the IMN group and 24.8 (range, 12-48) months in the plate group. Functional outcomes were evaluated based on the forearm pronation/supination range of motion, grip strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and Grace-Eversmann scoring criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time to union was 13.6 weeks in the plate group and 10.9 weeks in the IMN group (p<0.05). Union was achieved in 24 of 25 patients in the plate group (96%) and all patients in the IMN group (100%). The mean operative time was 69.7 (range, 45-110) minutes in the IMN group and 88.2 (range, 50-130) minutes in the plate group. The mean fluoroscopy time was 2.7 seconds in the plate group and 21.3 seconds in the IMN group. The mean length of hospital stay was five (range, 3-9) days in the plate group and four (range, 3-10) days in the IMN group. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the IMN group (p < 0.05), while the mean fluoroscopy time was longer in the IMN group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in forearm pronation and supination, grip strength, DASH score, and Grace-Eversmann scoring criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Locked IMNs seem a viable alternative to ORIF with plate osteosynthesis for adult diaphyseal forearm fractures with similar healing rates, functional scores, and shorter operative times.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Therapeutic Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7097,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/bc/aott-56-5-321.PMC9682570.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of plate fixation versus new-generation locked intramedullary nail in the management of adult forearm diaphyseal fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Oktay Polat, Serdar Toy\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/j.aott.2022.21190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare functional and radiographical outcomes following intramedullary nailing (IMN) versus plate and screw osteosynthesis in managing patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six patients (27 male, 19 female) were included in this retrospective study. Of these, 25 were treated with plate osteosynthesis and 21 with IMN. The mean age was 32.4 (range, 19-67) years in the plate group and 28.8 (range, 18-64) years in the IMN group. The mean follow-up was 22.3 (range, 12-36) months in the IMN group and 24.8 (range, 12-48) months in the plate group. Functional outcomes were evaluated based on the forearm pronation/supination range of motion, grip strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and Grace-Eversmann scoring criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time to union was 13.6 weeks in the plate group and 10.9 weeks in the IMN group (p<0.05). Union was achieved in 24 of 25 patients in the plate group (96%) and all patients in the IMN group (100%). The mean operative time was 69.7 (range, 45-110) minutes in the IMN group and 88.2 (range, 50-130) minutes in the plate group. The mean fluoroscopy time was 2.7 seconds in the plate group and 21.3 seconds in the IMN group. The mean length of hospital stay was five (range, 3-9) days in the plate group and four (range, 3-10) days in the IMN group. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the IMN group (p < 0.05), while the mean fluoroscopy time was longer in the IMN group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in forearm pronation and supination, grip strength, DASH score, and Grace-Eversmann scoring criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Locked IMNs seem a viable alternative to ORIF with plate osteosynthesis for adult diaphyseal forearm fractures with similar healing rates, functional scores, and shorter operative times.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Therapeutic Study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/bc/aott-56-5-321.PMC9682570.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.21190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.21190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of plate fixation versus new-generation locked intramedullary nail in the management of adult forearm diaphyseal fractures.
Objective: This study aimed to compare functional and radiographical outcomes following intramedullary nailing (IMN) versus plate and screw osteosynthesis in managing patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures.
Methods: Forty-six patients (27 male, 19 female) were included in this retrospective study. Of these, 25 were treated with plate osteosynthesis and 21 with IMN. The mean age was 32.4 (range, 19-67) years in the plate group and 28.8 (range, 18-64) years in the IMN group. The mean follow-up was 22.3 (range, 12-36) months in the IMN group and 24.8 (range, 12-48) months in the plate group. Functional outcomes were evaluated based on the forearm pronation/supination range of motion, grip strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and Grace-Eversmann scoring criteria.
Results: The median time to union was 13.6 weeks in the plate group and 10.9 weeks in the IMN group (p<0.05). Union was achieved in 24 of 25 patients in the plate group (96%) and all patients in the IMN group (100%). The mean operative time was 69.7 (range, 45-110) minutes in the IMN group and 88.2 (range, 50-130) minutes in the plate group. The mean fluoroscopy time was 2.7 seconds in the plate group and 21.3 seconds in the IMN group. The mean length of hospital stay was five (range, 3-9) days in the plate group and four (range, 3-10) days in the IMN group. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the IMN group (p < 0.05), while the mean fluoroscopy time was longer in the IMN group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in forearm pronation and supination, grip strength, DASH score, and Grace-Eversmann scoring criteria.
Conclusion: Locked IMNs seem a viable alternative to ORIF with plate osteosynthesis for adult diaphyseal forearm fractures with similar healing rates, functional scores, and shorter operative times.
期刊介绍：
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica (AOTT) is an international, scientific, open access periodical published in accordance with independent, unbiased, and double-blinded peer-review principles. The journal is the official publication of the Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. It is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September, and November. The publication language of the journal is English.
The aim of the journal is to publish original studies of the highest scientific and clinical value in orthopedics, traumatology, and related disciplines. The scope of the journal includes but not limited to diagnostic, treatment, and prevention methods related to orthopedics and traumatology. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica publishes clinical and basic research articles, case reports, personal clinical and technical notes, systematic reviews and meta-analyses and letters to the Editor. Proceedings of scientific meetings are also considered for publication.
The target audience of the journal includes healthcare professionals, physicians, and researchers who are interested or working in orthopedics and traumatology field, and related disciplines.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
