使用彩色多普勒评估视神经鞘直径的CLOSED方案:特发性常压脑积水患者队列的比较研究。

IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-29 DOI:10.1186/s13089-022-00291-5
Raffaele Aspide, Giacomo Bertolini, Laura Maria Beatrice Belotti, Luca Albini Riccioli, Francesco Toni, Diego Mazzatenta, Giorgio Palandri, Luigi Vetrugno, Daniele Guerino Biasucci
{"title":"使用彩色多普勒评估视神经鞘直径的CLOSED方案:特发性常压脑积水患者队列的比较研究。","authors":"Raffaele Aspide,&nbsp;Giacomo Bertolini,&nbsp;Laura Maria Beatrice Belotti,&nbsp;Luca Albini Riccioli,&nbsp;Francesco Toni,&nbsp;Diego Mazzatenta,&nbsp;Giorgio Palandri,&nbsp;Luigi Vetrugno,&nbsp;Daniele Guerino Biasucci","doi":"10.1186/s13089-022-00291-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath diameter represents a promising non-invasive technique for estimation of the intracranial pressure. A wide inter-observer variability, along with a lack of a standardized protocol for the optic nerve sheath diameter measurements, could lead to over- or under-estimation. The present study was aimed at evaluating feasibility of color-Doppler for better delineating optic nerve sheath borders, comparing it to B-mode imaging, using the magnetic resonance measurements as a comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Optic nerve sheath diameters were evaluated using magnetic resonance by an expert radiologist in a cohort of patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Magnetic resonance findings were evaluated twice. In the first half of this cohort, optic nerve sheath diameters were measured using B-mode only, in the second half applying color-Doppler. Measurements obtained using these two techniques were compared to magnetic resonance imaging measurements. The Bland-Altman analysis and concordance correlation coefficient were computed to quantify the strength of agreement between the two magnetic resonance assessments. Box plots and average (± SD) were used to compare assessments by sonographic and magnetic resonance methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were included. MRI assessment showed a moderate concordance correlation coefficient. Optic nerve sheath diameters measured applying color-Doppler were lower (p < 0.001) and less scattered compared to B-mode assessment, which approached more to magnetic resonance measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of patients, magnetic resonance showed high intra-rater variability in optic nerve sheath diameter assessments. Optic nerve sheath diameter assessments using color-Doppler yielded lower and less scattered diameters compared to B-mode only.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":" ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617984/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The CLOSED protocol to assess optic nerve sheath diameter using color-Doppler: a comparison study in a cohort of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients.\",\"authors\":\"Raffaele Aspide,&nbsp;Giacomo Bertolini,&nbsp;Laura Maria Beatrice Belotti,&nbsp;Luca Albini Riccioli,&nbsp;Francesco Toni,&nbsp;Diego Mazzatenta,&nbsp;Giorgio Palandri,&nbsp;Luigi Vetrugno,&nbsp;Daniele Guerino Biasucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13089-022-00291-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath diameter represents a promising non-invasive technique for estimation of the intracranial pressure. A wide inter-observer variability, along with a lack of a standardized protocol for the optic nerve sheath diameter measurements, could lead to over- or under-estimation. The present study was aimed at evaluating feasibility of color-Doppler for better delineating optic nerve sheath borders, comparing it to B-mode imaging, using the magnetic resonance measurements as a comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Optic nerve sheath diameters were evaluated using magnetic resonance by an expert radiologist in a cohort of patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Magnetic resonance findings were evaluated twice. In the first half of this cohort, optic nerve sheath diameters were measured using B-mode only, in the second half applying color-Doppler. Measurements obtained using these two techniques were compared to magnetic resonance imaging measurements. The Bland-Altman analysis and concordance correlation coefficient were computed to quantify the strength of agreement between the two magnetic resonance assessments. Box plots and average (± SD) were used to compare assessments by sonographic and magnetic resonance methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were included. MRI assessment showed a moderate concordance correlation coefficient. Optic nerve sheath diameters measured applying color-Doppler were lower (p < 0.001) and less scattered compared to B-mode assessment, which approached more to magnetic resonance measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of patients, magnetic resonance showed high intra-rater variability in optic nerve sheath diameter assessments. Optic nerve sheath diameter assessments using color-Doppler yielded lower and less scattered diameters compared to B-mode only.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617984/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00291-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00291-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:超声评估视神经鞘直径是一种很有前途的无创颅内压评估技术。观察者之间的广泛差异,以及缺乏视神经鞘直径测量的标准化协议,可能导致高估或低估。本研究旨在评估彩色多普勒更好地划定视神经鞘边界的可行性,将其与b模式成像进行比较,使用磁共振测量作为比较。方法:在一组疑似特发性常压脑积水的患者中,由放射科专家使用磁共振评估视神经鞘直径。对磁共振结果进行两次评估。在该队列的前半部分,视神经鞘直径仅使用B-mode测量,在后半段使用彩色多普勒测量。使用这两种技术获得的测量结果与磁共振成像测量结果进行了比较。计算Bland-Altman分析和一致性相关系数,以量化两种磁共振评估之间的一致性强度。采用箱形图和平均值(±SD)比较超声和磁共振方法的评估结果。结果:纳入50例患者。MRI评估显示中度一致性相关系数。彩色多普勒测量的视神经鞘直径较低(p)。结论:在该队列患者中,磁共振在视神经鞘直径评估中显示出较高的组内变异性。使用彩色多普勒评估视神经鞘直径,与仅使用b线扫描相比,其直径更低,更少分散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The CLOSED protocol to assess optic nerve sheath diameter using color-Doppler: a comparison study in a cohort of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients.

Background: Sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath diameter represents a promising non-invasive technique for estimation of the intracranial pressure. A wide inter-observer variability, along with a lack of a standardized protocol for the optic nerve sheath diameter measurements, could lead to over- or under-estimation. The present study was aimed at evaluating feasibility of color-Doppler for better delineating optic nerve sheath borders, comparing it to B-mode imaging, using the magnetic resonance measurements as a comparison.

Methods: Optic nerve sheath diameters were evaluated using magnetic resonance by an expert radiologist in a cohort of patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Magnetic resonance findings were evaluated twice. In the first half of this cohort, optic nerve sheath diameters were measured using B-mode only, in the second half applying color-Doppler. Measurements obtained using these two techniques were compared to magnetic resonance imaging measurements. The Bland-Altman analysis and concordance correlation coefficient were computed to quantify the strength of agreement between the two magnetic resonance assessments. Box plots and average (± SD) were used to compare assessments by sonographic and magnetic resonance methods.

Results: Fifty patients were included. MRI assessment showed a moderate concordance correlation coefficient. Optic nerve sheath diameters measured applying color-Doppler were lower (p < 0.001) and less scattered compared to B-mode assessment, which approached more to magnetic resonance measurements.

Conclusions: In this cohort of patients, magnetic resonance showed high intra-rater variability in optic nerve sheath diameter assessments. Optic nerve sheath diameter assessments using color-Doppler yielded lower and less scattered diameters compared to B-mode only.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
SPOT THE BOT: A comparative quality assessment of AI-generated written instructions for lung ultrasound training. Quality evaluation of ultrasound images for fetal crown-rump length measurement at 11 to 14 weeks' gestation: A fusion model can be interpreted using SHAP method. Description of an independently developed quality assessment tool to meet emergency department credentialing and Emergency Ultrasound Fellowship Accreditation Council guidelines. Dynamic right diaphragmatic herniation revealed by point-of-care ultrasound in hepatic hydrothorax. Towards reduced ultrasound localization microscopy acquisition times by uncoupling a bi-disperse microbubble population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1