2021年全国麻醉学会在四大社交网络上的全球存在:观察性案例研究

Thomas Clavier, Emilie Occhiali, Claire Guenet, Naurine Vannier, Camille Hache, Vincent Compere, Jean Selim, Emmanuel Besnier
{"title":"2021年全国麻醉学会在四大社交网络上的全球存在:观察性案例研究","authors":"Thomas Clavier,&nbsp;Emilie Occhiali,&nbsp;Claire Guenet,&nbsp;Naurine Vannier,&nbsp;Camille Hache,&nbsp;Vincent Compere,&nbsp;Jean Selim,&nbsp;Emmanuel Besnier","doi":"10.2196/34549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the presence of medical societies on social networks (SNs) could be interesting for disseminating professional information, there is no study investigating their presence on SNs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this viewpoint is to describe the worldwide presence and activity of national anesthesia societies on SNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study assessed the active presence (≥1 post in the year preceding the collection date) of the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists member societies on the SNs Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. We collected data concerning each anesthesia society on the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 136 societies, 66 (48.5%) had an active presence on at least one SN. The most used SN was Facebook (n=60, 44.1%), followed by Twitter (n=37, 27.2%), YouTube (n=26, 19.1%), and Instagram (n=16, 11.8%). The SN with the largest number of followers was Facebook for 52 (78.8%) societies and Twitter for 12 (18.2%) societies. The number of followers was 361 (IQR 75-1806) on Twitter, 2494 (IQR 1049-5369) on Facebook, 1400 (IQR 303-3058) on Instagram, and 214 (IQR 33-955) on YouTube. There was a strong correlation between the number of posts and the number of followers on Twitter (r=0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.97; P<.001), Instagram (r=0.83, 95% CI 0.58-0.94; P<.001), and YouTube (r=0.69, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; P<.001). According to the density of anesthetists in the country, there was no difference between societies with and without active SN accounts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than half of national anesthesia societies have at least one active account on SNs. Twitter and Facebook are the most used SNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e34549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350816/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Clavier,&nbsp;Emilie Occhiali,&nbsp;Claire Guenet,&nbsp;Naurine Vannier,&nbsp;Camille Hache,&nbsp;Vincent Compere,&nbsp;Jean Selim,&nbsp;Emmanuel Besnier\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/34549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the presence of medical societies on social networks (SNs) could be interesting for disseminating professional information, there is no study investigating their presence on SNs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this viewpoint is to describe the worldwide presence and activity of national anesthesia societies on SNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study assessed the active presence (≥1 post in the year preceding the collection date) of the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists member societies on the SNs Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. We collected data concerning each anesthesia society on the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 136 societies, 66 (48.5%) had an active presence on at least one SN. The most used SN was Facebook (n=60, 44.1%), followed by Twitter (n=37, 27.2%), YouTube (n=26, 19.1%), and Instagram (n=16, 11.8%). The SN with the largest number of followers was Facebook for 52 (78.8%) societies and Twitter for 12 (18.2%) societies. The number of followers was 361 (IQR 75-1806) on Twitter, 2494 (IQR 1049-5369) on Facebook, 1400 (IQR 303-3058) on Instagram, and 214 (IQR 33-955) on YouTube. There was a strong correlation between the number of posts and the number of followers on Twitter (r=0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.97; P<.001), Instagram (r=0.83, 95% CI 0.58-0.94; P<.001), and YouTube (r=0.69, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; P<.001). According to the density of anesthetists in the country, there was no difference between societies with and without active SN accounts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than half of national anesthesia societies have at least one active account on SNs. Twitter and Facebook are the most used SNs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR perioperative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e34549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350816/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR perioperative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/34549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/34549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:尽管医学协会在社交网络(SNs)上的存在对于传播专业信息可能是有趣的,但没有研究调查他们在社交网络上的存在。目的:这一观点的目的是描述世界范围内国家麻醉学会在SNs上的存在和活动。方法:本观察性研究评估了世界麻醉师协会联合会会员协会在社交网站Twitter、Facebook、Instagram和YouTube上的活跃状态(收集日期前一年≥1条帖子)。我们在世界麻醉医师协会联合会网站上收集了有关每个麻醉学会的数据。结果:136个学会中有66个(48.5%)在至少一个SN上活跃存在。使用最多的SN是Facebook (n=60, 44.1%),其次是Twitter (n=37, 27.2%)、YouTube (n=26, 19.1%)和Instagram (n=16, 11.8%)。粉丝最多的社交网站是Facebook,有52个(78.8%),Twitter有12个(18.2%)。Twitter的粉丝数为361人(IQR 75-1806), Facebook的粉丝数为2494人(IQR 1049-5369), Instagram的粉丝数为1400人(IQR 303-3058), YouTube的粉丝数为214人(IQR 33-955)。Twitter上的帖子数量与关注者数量之间存在很强的相关性(r=0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.97;结论:不到一半的国家麻醉学会在SNs上至少有一个活跃账户。Twitter和Facebook是最常用的社交网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study.

Background: Although the presence of medical societies on social networks (SNs) could be interesting for disseminating professional information, there is no study investigating their presence on SNs.

Objective: The aim of this viewpoint is to describe the worldwide presence and activity of national anesthesia societies on SNs.

Methods: This observational study assessed the active presence (≥1 post in the year preceding the collection date) of the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists member societies on the SNs Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. We collected data concerning each anesthesia society on the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists website.

Results: Among the 136 societies, 66 (48.5%) had an active presence on at least one SN. The most used SN was Facebook (n=60, 44.1%), followed by Twitter (n=37, 27.2%), YouTube (n=26, 19.1%), and Instagram (n=16, 11.8%). The SN with the largest number of followers was Facebook for 52 (78.8%) societies and Twitter for 12 (18.2%) societies. The number of followers was 361 (IQR 75-1806) on Twitter, 2494 (IQR 1049-5369) on Facebook, 1400 (IQR 303-3058) on Instagram, and 214 (IQR 33-955) on YouTube. There was a strong correlation between the number of posts and the number of followers on Twitter (r=0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.97; P<.001), Instagram (r=0.83, 95% CI 0.58-0.94; P<.001), and YouTube (r=0.69, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; P<.001). According to the density of anesthetists in the country, there was no difference between societies with and without active SN accounts.

Conclusions: Less than half of national anesthesia societies have at least one active account on SNs. Twitter and Facebook are the most used SNs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Brief Submaximal Cardiopulmonary Testing in a High-Volume Presurgical Evaluation Clinic: Feasibility Cohort Study. Correction: A Patient-Oriented Implementation Strategy for a Perioperative mHealth Intervention: Feasibility Cohort Study. Enhancing Quadruple Health Outcomes After Thoracic Surgery: Feasibility Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Using Digital Home Monitoring. Agreement Between Provider-Completed and Patient-Completed Preoperative Frailty Screening Using the Clinical Risk Analysis Index: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. A Patient-Oriented Implementation Strategy for a Perioperative mHealth Intervention: Feasibility Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1