对近期尝试过戒烟和未尝试过戒烟的吸烟者吸烟信念之间关系的心理网络分析。

IF 4.7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2022.2130920
Sarah C Volz, Alexander J Rothman
{"title":"对近期尝试过戒烟和未尝试过戒烟的吸烟者吸烟信念之间关系的心理网络分析。","authors":"Sarah C Volz, Alexander J Rothman","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2022.2130920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychological network analysis was used to evaluate the relations between beliefs about cigarette smoking in current smokers with and without a recent quit attempt and determine if these networks differed in global strength (how strongly beliefs are related) or global structure (which beliefs are related).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using two publicly available datasets, the California Smokers' Cohort (CSC; <i>N</i> = 933) and Wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH; <i>N</i> = 7855), we evaluated differences in global strength and global structure of the beliefs held by current smokers with and without a recent quit attempt.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Strength and structure of networks generated for current smokers with and without a recent quit attempt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the CSC dataset there were differences between smokers with and without a recent quit attempt in global structure and marginal differences in global strength; the PATH dataset suggested small differences in global strength and structure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study suggests that consideration of relations among smoking beliefs may be a valuable contribution to characterizing smoking beliefs when assessing smoking quit attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"1148-1165"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological network analysis of the relations between beliefs about smoking for smokers with and without a recent quit attempt.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C Volz, Alexander J Rothman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08870446.2022.2130920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychological network analysis was used to evaluate the relations between beliefs about cigarette smoking in current smokers with and without a recent quit attempt and determine if these networks differed in global strength (how strongly beliefs are related) or global structure (which beliefs are related).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using two publicly available datasets, the California Smokers' Cohort (CSC; <i>N</i> = 933) and Wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH; <i>N</i> = 7855), we evaluated differences in global strength and global structure of the beliefs held by current smokers with and without a recent quit attempt.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Strength and structure of networks generated for current smokers with and without a recent quit attempt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the CSC dataset there were differences between smokers with and without a recent quit attempt in global structure and marginal differences in global strength; the PATH dataset suggested small differences in global strength and structure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study suggests that consideration of relations among smoking beliefs may be a valuable contribution to characterizing smoking beliefs when assessing smoking quit attempts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1148-1165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2130920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2130920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的采用心理网络分析法评估有戒烟经历和没有戒烟经历的当前吸烟者的吸烟信念之间的关系,并确定这些网络在整体强度(信念之间的关联程度)或整体结构(哪些信念之间存在关联)方面是否存在差异:利用两个公开数据集,即加利福尼亚吸烟者队列(CSC;N = 933)和烟草与健康人群评估(PATH;N = 7855)第 1 波,我们评估了当前吸烟者所持信念的全局强度和全局结构的差异:主要结果测量指标:当前吸烟者(最近有戒烟尝试和没有戒烟尝试)产生的网络强度和结构:在CSC数据集中,近期有戒烟尝试和没有戒烟尝试的吸烟者在总体结构上存在差异,总体强度也略有不同;PATH数据集显示,总体强度和结构差异较小:本研究表明,在评估戒烟尝试时,考虑吸烟信念之间的关系可能会对吸烟信念的特征描述做出有价值的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychological network analysis of the relations between beliefs about smoking for smokers with and without a recent quit attempt.

Objective: Psychological network analysis was used to evaluate the relations between beliefs about cigarette smoking in current smokers with and without a recent quit attempt and determine if these networks differed in global strength (how strongly beliefs are related) or global structure (which beliefs are related).

Design: Using two publicly available datasets, the California Smokers' Cohort (CSC; N = 933) and Wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH; N = 7855), we evaluated differences in global strength and global structure of the beliefs held by current smokers with and without a recent quit attempt.

Main outcome measures: Strength and structure of networks generated for current smokers with and without a recent quit attempt.

Results: In the CSC dataset there were differences between smokers with and without a recent quit attempt in global structure and marginal differences in global strength; the PATH dataset suggested small differences in global strength and structure.

Conclusion: The present study suggests that consideration of relations among smoking beliefs may be a valuable contribution to characterizing smoking beliefs when assessing smoking quit attempts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Three in One: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Anticancer Activity of a Theranostic Agent that Combines Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Optical Bioimaging, and Photodynamic Therapy Capabilities". Trastuzumab Conjugation Enhances HER2-Positive Cell Association and Intratumoral Retention of Magnetite Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia. Cell Membrane Targeting via Spacer Length-Engineered Amphiphilic DNA Frameworks. Facile Microemulsion Preparation of Paclitaxel-Loaded Silk Fibroin Nanoparticles Using Polyethylene Glycol for Glioblastoma Therapy. Silk Sericin Functionalized with Carboxy Drugs for Dermocosmetic Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1