使用通用粘合剂评估金属托架与二硅酸锂陶瓷支架剪切粘接强度的体外研究

Q4 Medicine L'' Orthodontie française Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1684/orthodfr.2022.56
Jessica Essayagh Tourot, Claire-Adeline Dantagnan, Philippe Francois, Elisabeth Dursun, Jean-Pierre Attal
{"title":"使用通用粘合剂评估金属托架与二硅酸锂陶瓷支架剪切粘接强度的体外研究","authors":"Jessica Essayagh Tourot, Claire-Adeline Dantagnan, Philippe Francois, Elisabeth Dursun, Jean-Pierre Attal","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2022.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of adult patients who seek an orthodontic treatment is increasing. These patients often have lithium disilicate ceramic restorations. The orthodontist has to find a procedure to bond effectively brackets to these restorations. In 2011, a new family of adhesives was introduced, universal adhesives, which are capable of bonding to ceramic and are said “multi-mode” because they can be used in etching-rinse or self-etching protocol on tooth surface. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty machinable lithium disilicate blocks (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were prepared according manufacturer’s instructions. Each specimen was randomly assigned to one of four groups (n=9 or 10) defined by the pretreatment protocol. Protocol 1: Hydrofluoric Acid 9 % (HF) + Silane + Orthodontic adhesive (Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive Primer, 3M ESPE), protocol 2: HF + Universal adhesive (UA) (Scotchbond Universal®, 3M ESPE), protocol 3: UA only, protocol 4 : Monobond Etch & Prime® (Ivoclar) + UA. Then, a bracket of upper cuspid (3M ESPE) was bonded to each specimen with a composite resin (Transbond™ XT, 3M ESPE). SBS was measured between ceramic and bracket with a universal testing machine. A one-way ANOVA (ANalysis Of Variance) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was performed to investigate SBS differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocol 2 (43 MPa) and protocol 4 (36 MPa) showed the highest SBS values and were statistically different from protocol 1 (25 MPa) and protocol 3 (21 MPa).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the lower bond values obtained in the study, but higher than the minimum expected, the application of UA alone appears to be a safe procedure that seems to provide sufficiently strong and resistant bonding between the ceramic and the bracket. However, clinical studies are needed before a recommendation can be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":"93 2","pages":"101-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro study evaluating the shear bond strength of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Essayagh Tourot, Claire-Adeline Dantagnan, Philippe Francois, Elisabeth Dursun, Jean-Pierre Attal\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/orthodfr.2022.56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of adult patients who seek an orthodontic treatment is increasing. These patients often have lithium disilicate ceramic restorations. The orthodontist has to find a procedure to bond effectively brackets to these restorations. In 2011, a new family of adhesives was introduced, universal adhesives, which are capable of bonding to ceramic and are said “multi-mode” because they can be used in etching-rinse or self-etching protocol on tooth surface. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty machinable lithium disilicate blocks (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were prepared according manufacturer’s instructions. Each specimen was randomly assigned to one of four groups (n=9 or 10) defined by the pretreatment protocol. Protocol 1: Hydrofluoric Acid 9 % (HF) + Silane + Orthodontic adhesive (Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive Primer, 3M ESPE), protocol 2: HF + Universal adhesive (UA) (Scotchbond Universal®, 3M ESPE), protocol 3: UA only, protocol 4 : Monobond Etch & Prime® (Ivoclar) + UA. Then, a bracket of upper cuspid (3M ESPE) was bonded to each specimen with a composite resin (Transbond™ XT, 3M ESPE). SBS was measured between ceramic and bracket with a universal testing machine. A one-way ANOVA (ANalysis Of Variance) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was performed to investigate SBS differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocol 2 (43 MPa) and protocol 4 (36 MPa) showed the highest SBS values and were statistically different from protocol 1 (25 MPa) and protocol 3 (21 MPa).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the lower bond values obtained in the study, but higher than the minimum expected, the application of UA alone appears to be a safe procedure that seems to provide sufficiently strong and resistant bonding between the ceramic and the bracket. However, clinical studies are needed before a recommendation can be made.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"volume\":\"93 2\",\"pages\":\"101-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2022.56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2022.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介寻求正畸治疗的成年患者越来越多。这些患者通常使用二硅酸锂陶瓷修复体。正畸医生必须找到一种能有效地将托槽粘结到这些修复体上的方法。2011 年,一种新的粘合剂系列--通用粘合剂问世,这种粘合剂能够粘结陶瓷,并被称为 "多模式 "粘合剂,因为它们可以在牙齿表面进行蚀刻-冲洗或自酸蚀处理。这项体外研究的目的是评估使用通用粘合剂的金属支架与二硅酸锂陶瓷支架的剪切粘结强度(SBS):按照制造商的说明制备 40 个可加工的二硅酸锂陶瓷块(IPS e.max CAD,Ivoclar)。根据预处理方案,每个试样被随机分配到四组(n=9 或 10)中的一组。第一组:9%氢氟酸(HF)+硅烷+正畸粘合剂(Transbond™ XT 光固化粘合剂底漆,3M ESPE);第二组:HF+通用粘合剂(UA)(Scotchbond Universal®,3M ESPE);第三组:仅使用通用粘合剂;第四组:Monobond Etch & Prime® (Ivoclar)+通用粘合剂。然后,用复合树脂(Transbond™ XT,3M ESPE)将上尖牙托架(3M ESPE)粘结到每个试样上。用万能试验机测量陶瓷和支架之间的 SBS。采用单因子方差分析(ANalysis Of Variance)和 Tukey 后验法研究各组之间的 SBS 差异:结果:方案 2(43 兆帕)和方案 4(36 兆帕)显示出最高的 SBS 值,与方案 1(25 兆帕)和方案 3(21 兆帕)存在统计学差异:尽管研究中获得的粘接值较低,但高于预期的最低值,单独使用 UA 似乎是一种安全的方法,似乎可以在陶瓷和托槽之间提供足够强的抗粘接性。不过,在提出建议之前还需要进行临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In vitro study evaluating the shear bond strength of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive

Introduction: The number of adult patients who seek an orthodontic treatment is increasing. These patients often have lithium disilicate ceramic restorations. The orthodontist has to find a procedure to bond effectively brackets to these restorations. In 2011, a new family of adhesives was introduced, universal adhesives, which are capable of bonding to ceramic and are said “multi-mode” because they can be used in etching-rinse or self-etching protocol on tooth surface. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive.

Materials and methods: Forty machinable lithium disilicate blocks (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were prepared according manufacturer’s instructions. Each specimen was randomly assigned to one of four groups (n=9 or 10) defined by the pretreatment protocol. Protocol 1: Hydrofluoric Acid 9 % (HF) + Silane + Orthodontic adhesive (Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive Primer, 3M ESPE), protocol 2: HF + Universal adhesive (UA) (Scotchbond Universal®, 3M ESPE), protocol 3: UA only, protocol 4 : Monobond Etch & Prime® (Ivoclar) + UA. Then, a bracket of upper cuspid (3M ESPE) was bonded to each specimen with a composite resin (Transbond™ XT, 3M ESPE). SBS was measured between ceramic and bracket with a universal testing machine. A one-way ANOVA (ANalysis Of Variance) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was performed to investigate SBS differences between groups.

Results: Protocol 2 (43 MPa) and protocol 4 (36 MPa) showed the highest SBS values and were statistically different from protocol 1 (25 MPa) and protocol 3 (21 MPa).

Conclusion: Despite the lower bond values obtained in the study, but higher than the minimum expected, the application of UA alone appears to be a safe procedure that seems to provide sufficiently strong and resistant bonding between the ceramic and the bracket. However, clinical studies are needed before a recommendation can be made.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
L'' Orthodontie française
L'' Orthodontie française Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.
期刊最新文献
Orofacial myofunctional reeducation assisted by a prefabricated reeducation appliance: towards a necessary paradigm shift The « patient casting »: a key decision in orthognathic surgery How to adapt orthodontic treatment for a patient with a general pathology? Review of the literature based on six scenarios that challenge the practitioner Simultaneous rehabilitation of the tongue and breathing: a physiological necessity Repousser les limites des possibilités de mise en place des canines incluses maxillaires ou mandibulaires avec le système simplifié CT8. Un entretien avec Daniel Chillès, Sylvia Riemenschneider-Chillès et Jean-Gabriel Chillès.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1