美国各州蓝藻有害藻华外联和监测工作的现状。

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 LIMNOLOGY Lake and Reservoir Management Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.1080/10402381.2020.1863530
F Joan Hardy, Ellen Preece, Lorraine Backer
{"title":"美国各州蓝藻有害藻华外联和监测工作的现状。","authors":"F Joan Hardy,&nbsp;Ellen Preece,&nbsp;Lorraine Backer","doi":"10.1080/10402381.2020.1863530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A widespread effort is underway to improve awareness of cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) across the United States using a variety of monitoring programs and public health outreach measures to protect people, pets, and livestock. To determine the status of cyanoHAB outreach and monitoring efforts, 2 questionnaires were distributed to health/environmental departments in 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC). One questionnaire focused on cyanoHAB exposure to humans from drinking water and the second targeted exposure through recreational activities. All states plus DC responded to the recreational survey; 46 states plus DC responded to the drinking water survey. All states except Alaska answered that microcystins were the cyanotoxins of greatest concern for recreational exposure; microcystins were also of greatest concern for drinking water with the exception of Utah (anatoxin-a in reservoirs was greatest concern) and Rhode Island (microcystins and anatoxin-a in reservoirs/ponds were greatest concern). Regional comparisons disclosed a lack of cyanoHAB programs in southern states relative to northern states that may be related to the higher percentage of water surface area in northern states. Interestingly, recreational outreach is more extensive than drinking water outreach (only 16 states reported having some type of drinking water outreach program, compared with 35 states with recreational outreach), and preferred outreach methods are websites and press releases. Additionally, respondents reported very limited funding for outreach and monitoring programs. Our results establish baseline information to help determine what future direction cyanoHAB outreach and monitoring programs can take at local, regional, and national levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":18017,"journal":{"name":"Lake and Reservoir Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10402381.2020.1863530","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Status of state cyanoHAB outreach and monitoring efforts, United States.\",\"authors\":\"F Joan Hardy,&nbsp;Ellen Preece,&nbsp;Lorraine Backer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10402381.2020.1863530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A widespread effort is underway to improve awareness of cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) across the United States using a variety of monitoring programs and public health outreach measures to protect people, pets, and livestock. To determine the status of cyanoHAB outreach and monitoring efforts, 2 questionnaires were distributed to health/environmental departments in 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC). One questionnaire focused on cyanoHAB exposure to humans from drinking water and the second targeted exposure through recreational activities. All states plus DC responded to the recreational survey; 46 states plus DC responded to the drinking water survey. All states except Alaska answered that microcystins were the cyanotoxins of greatest concern for recreational exposure; microcystins were also of greatest concern for drinking water with the exception of Utah (anatoxin-a in reservoirs was greatest concern) and Rhode Island (microcystins and anatoxin-a in reservoirs/ponds were greatest concern). Regional comparisons disclosed a lack of cyanoHAB programs in southern states relative to northern states that may be related to the higher percentage of water surface area in northern states. Interestingly, recreational outreach is more extensive than drinking water outreach (only 16 states reported having some type of drinking water outreach program, compared with 35 states with recreational outreach), and preferred outreach methods are websites and press releases. Additionally, respondents reported very limited funding for outreach and monitoring programs. Our results establish baseline information to help determine what future direction cyanoHAB outreach and monitoring programs can take at local, regional, and national levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lake and Reservoir Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10402381.2020.1863530\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lake and Reservoir Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2020.1863530\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lake and Reservoir Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2020.1863530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

为了提高美国各地对蓝藻有害藻华(cyanoHABs)的认识,正在开展一项广泛的努力,利用各种监测项目和公共卫生推广措施来保护人类、宠物和牲畜。为了确定蓝藻有害藻外展和监测工作的现状,向50个州和哥伦比亚特区的卫生/环境部门分发了2份问卷。一份调查问卷的重点是人类从饮用水中接触到的蓝藻藻华,另一份调查问卷的目标是通过娱乐活动接触到的蓝藻藻华。所有州和华盛顿特区都参与了娱乐性调查;46个州加上华盛顿对饮用水调查做出了回应。除阿拉斯加州外,所有州都回答说微囊藻毒素是最值得关注的娱乐接触的蓝藻毒素;除了犹他州(水库中的微囊藻毒素a最受关注)和罗德岛州(水库/池塘中的微囊藻毒素和微囊藻毒素a最受关注)外,饮用水中的微囊藻毒素也是最受关注的。区域比较显示,与北部各州相比,南部各州缺乏蓝藻有害藻华项目,这可能与北部各州较高的水面面积百分比有关。有趣的是,娱乐外展比饮用水外展更广泛(只有16个州报告有某种形式的饮用水外展计划,相比之下有35个州有娱乐外展),首选的外展方法是网站和新闻稿。此外,受访者表示,用于外联和监测项目的资金非常有限。我们的研究结果建立了基线信息,以帮助确定在地方、区域和国家层面上蓝藻藻华的推广和监测计划的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Status of state cyanoHAB outreach and monitoring efforts, United States.

A widespread effort is underway to improve awareness of cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) across the United States using a variety of monitoring programs and public health outreach measures to protect people, pets, and livestock. To determine the status of cyanoHAB outreach and monitoring efforts, 2 questionnaires were distributed to health/environmental departments in 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC). One questionnaire focused on cyanoHAB exposure to humans from drinking water and the second targeted exposure through recreational activities. All states plus DC responded to the recreational survey; 46 states plus DC responded to the drinking water survey. All states except Alaska answered that microcystins were the cyanotoxins of greatest concern for recreational exposure; microcystins were also of greatest concern for drinking water with the exception of Utah (anatoxin-a in reservoirs was greatest concern) and Rhode Island (microcystins and anatoxin-a in reservoirs/ponds were greatest concern). Regional comparisons disclosed a lack of cyanoHAB programs in southern states relative to northern states that may be related to the higher percentage of water surface area in northern states. Interestingly, recreational outreach is more extensive than drinking water outreach (only 16 states reported having some type of drinking water outreach program, compared with 35 states with recreational outreach), and preferred outreach methods are websites and press releases. Additionally, respondents reported very limited funding for outreach and monitoring programs. Our results establish baseline information to help determine what future direction cyanoHAB outreach and monitoring programs can take at local, regional, and national levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lake and Reservoir Management
Lake and Reservoir Management 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Lake and Reservoir Management (LRM) publishes original, previously unpublished studies relevant to lake and reservoir management. Papers address the management of lakes and reservoirs, their watersheds and tributaries, along with the limnology and ecology needed for sound management of these systems. Case studies that advance the science of lake management or confirm important management concepts are appropriate as long as there is clearly described management significance. Papers on economic, social, regulatory and policy aspects of lake management are also welcome with appropriate supporting data and management implications. Literature syntheses and papers developing a conceptual foundation of lake and watershed ecology will be considered for publication, but there needs to be clear emphasis on management implications. Modeling papers will be considered where the model is properly verified but it is also highly preferable that management based on the model has been taken and results have been documented. Application of known models to yet another system without a clear advance in resultant management are unlikely to be accepted. Shorter notes that convey important early results of long-term studies or provide data relating to causative agents or management approaches that warrant further study are acceptable even if the story is not yet complete. All submissions are subject to peer review to assure relevance and reliability for management application.
期刊最新文献
Spatial-temporal shifts in submersed aquatic vegetation community structure resulting from a selective herbicide treatment in Lake Sampson, Florida, USA Relative energy and perceived impact of vessel-generated waves in fetch-limited environments Watershed grassland fires drive nutrient increases in replicated experimental ponds Remote cyanobacteria detection by multispectral drone imagery Effects of aeration on water quality in agricultural reservoirs in the northern Great Plains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1