不平等的两个划时代的转折,它们的意义和动力。

IF 1 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Journal of Chinese Sociology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-22 DOI:10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0
Göran Therborn
{"title":"不平等的两个划时代的转折,它们的意义和动力。","authors":"Göran Therborn","doi":"10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At the end of the twentieth century, two historical turns of economic inequality happened. Among the developed countries of the Global North, the secular trend of decreasing intra-national inequality turned into its opposite. At about the same time, the long period of global inequality began to bend down, among households as well as among nations, a turn less noticed but more significant than the reduction of extreme poverty in the South. The foundation of the former turn was the beginning of de-industrialization in the North, and the coming of a post-industrial society, very different from the one predicted. The paper analyzes the trigger of the turn and the central dynamics of the new inequality in the rich North, financialization, and the digital revolution. It then tries to answer two questions about the global turn: Was the decline of global inequality causally connected to the increase of Northern intra-national inequality? Will there be a development of industrial societies in the South? The answer to both is no. What lies ahead is more likely a global convergence of intra-national unequalization, albeit with both different and similar dynamics, as the decline of extreme poverty in the South is leading to inequality increases comparable to those of the North. Post-industrialism has no egalitarian dialectic like that of industrial capitalism, but the dynamics of the twenty-first century inequality are likely to be confronted not only with popular protest movements but also with an emergent scholarly and intellectual Egalitarian Enlightenment.</p>","PeriodicalId":52168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics.\",\"authors\":\"Göran Therborn\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>At the end of the twentieth century, two historical turns of economic inequality happened. Among the developed countries of the Global North, the secular trend of decreasing intra-national inequality turned into its opposite. At about the same time, the long period of global inequality began to bend down, among households as well as among nations, a turn less noticed but more significant than the reduction of extreme poverty in the South. The foundation of the former turn was the beginning of de-industrialization in the North, and the coming of a post-industrial society, very different from the one predicted. The paper analyzes the trigger of the turn and the central dynamics of the new inequality in the rich North, financialization, and the digital revolution. It then tries to answer two questions about the global turn: Was the decline of global inequality causally connected to the increase of Northern intra-national inequality? Will there be a development of industrial societies in the South? The answer to both is no. What lies ahead is more likely a global convergence of intra-national unequalization, albeit with both different and similar dynamics, as the decline of extreme poverty in the South is leading to inequality increases comparable to those of the North. Post-industrialism has no egalitarian dialectic like that of industrial capitalism, but the dynamics of the twenty-first century inequality are likely to be confronted not only with popular protest movements but also with an emergent scholarly and intellectual Egalitarian Enlightenment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪末,出现了两次经济不平等的历史转折。在全球北方的发达国家中,国家内部不平等减少的长期趋势变成了相反的趋势。大约在同一时间,长期以来的全球不平等现象开始缓和,家庭之间和国家之间都是如此,这一转变不太引人注目,但比南方国家极端贫困的减少更为重要。前一种转变的基础是北方的去工业化的开始,以及与预测截然不同的后工业社会的到来。本文分析了这种转变的触发因素,以及富裕的北方、金融化和数字革命中新的不平等的核心动力。然后,它试图回答关于全球转向的两个问题:全球不平等的下降是否与北方国家内部不平等的增加有因果关系?南方会发展工业社会吗?两个问题的答案都是否定的。未来的情况更有可能是国家内部不平等的全球趋同,尽管其动态既不同又相似,因为南方极端贫困的减少正在导致不平等的加剧,与北方的情况相当。后工业主义不像工业资本主义那样具有平等主义的辩证法,但21世纪不平等的动态不仅可能面临大众抗议运动,还可能面临新兴的学术和知识平等主义启蒙运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics.

At the end of the twentieth century, two historical turns of economic inequality happened. Among the developed countries of the Global North, the secular trend of decreasing intra-national inequality turned into its opposite. At about the same time, the long period of global inequality began to bend down, among households as well as among nations, a turn less noticed but more significant than the reduction of extreme poverty in the South. The foundation of the former turn was the beginning of de-industrialization in the North, and the coming of a post-industrial society, very different from the one predicted. The paper analyzes the trigger of the turn and the central dynamics of the new inequality in the rich North, financialization, and the digital revolution. It then tries to answer two questions about the global turn: Was the decline of global inequality causally connected to the increase of Northern intra-national inequality? Will there be a development of industrial societies in the South? The answer to both is no. What lies ahead is more likely a global convergence of intra-national unequalization, albeit with both different and similar dynamics, as the decline of extreme poverty in the South is leading to inequality increases comparable to those of the North. Post-industrialism has no egalitarian dialectic like that of industrial capitalism, but the dynamics of the twenty-first century inequality are likely to be confronted not only with popular protest movements but also with an emergent scholarly and intellectual Egalitarian Enlightenment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chinese Sociology
Journal of Chinese Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
From fatherhood premium to motherhood penalty: trends in the fertility effects on men's and women's wage in China (1989–2015) Digital sociology: origin, development, and prospects from a global perspective Observations of Chinese fandom: organizational characteristics and the relationships inside and outside the “Fan circle” The interplay of gender, motherhood, and the digital economy in China: exploring the experiences of urban mothers in WeChat businesses Resonance as a medio-passive, emancipatory and transformative power: a reply to my critics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1