提高大麻素口服生物利用度的策略。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-18 DOI:10.1080/17425255.2022.2099837
Ayala Bar-Hai, Abraham J Domb, Amnon Hoffman
{"title":"提高大麻素口服生物利用度的策略。","authors":"Ayala Bar-Hai,&nbsp;Abraham J Domb,&nbsp;Amnon Hoffman","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2022.2099837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral administration of cannabinoids is a convenient route of administration in many cases. To enhance the poor and variable bioavailability of cannabinoids, selected strategies utilizing proper delivery systems have been designed. Low solubility in the GI aqueous media is the first and most critical barrier. Thereafter, cannabinoids can reach the systemic blood circulation via the portal vein that is associated with significant hepatic first pass metabolism (FPM) or bypass it via lymphatic absorption.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The solubility obstacle of cannabinoids is mainly addressed with lipid-based formulations such as self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS). Certain lipids are used to overcome the solubility issue. Surfactants and other additives in the formulation have additional impact on several barriers, including dictating the degree of lymphatic bioavailability and hepatic FPM. Gastro-retentive formulation is also plausible.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Comparison of the role of the same SNEDDS formulation, cyclosporine vs. cannabinoids, when used to elevate the oral bioavailability of different compounds, is presented. It illustrates some similarities and major mechanistic differences obtained by the same SNEDDS. Thus, the different influence over the absorption pathway illuminates the importance of understanding the absorption mechanism and its barriers to properly select appropriate strategies to achieve enhanced oral bioavailability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12250,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","volume":"18 5","pages":"313-322"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for enhancing the oral bioavailability of cannabinoids.\",\"authors\":\"Ayala Bar-Hai,&nbsp;Abraham J Domb,&nbsp;Amnon Hoffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425255.2022.2099837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral administration of cannabinoids is a convenient route of administration in many cases. To enhance the poor and variable bioavailability of cannabinoids, selected strategies utilizing proper delivery systems have been designed. Low solubility in the GI aqueous media is the first and most critical barrier. Thereafter, cannabinoids can reach the systemic blood circulation via the portal vein that is associated with significant hepatic first pass metabolism (FPM) or bypass it via lymphatic absorption.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The solubility obstacle of cannabinoids is mainly addressed with lipid-based formulations such as self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS). Certain lipids are used to overcome the solubility issue. Surfactants and other additives in the formulation have additional impact on several barriers, including dictating the degree of lymphatic bioavailability and hepatic FPM. Gastro-retentive formulation is also plausible.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Comparison of the role of the same SNEDDS formulation, cyclosporine vs. cannabinoids, when used to elevate the oral bioavailability of different compounds, is presented. It illustrates some similarities and major mechanistic differences obtained by the same SNEDDS. Thus, the different influence over the absorption pathway illuminates the importance of understanding the absorption mechanism and its barriers to properly select appropriate strategies to achieve enhanced oral bioavailability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"313-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2022.2099837\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2022.2099837","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

简介:在许多情况下,口服大麻素是一种方便的给药途径。为了提高大麻素的不良和可变的生物利用度,已经设计了利用适当的输送系统的选择策略。在GI水介质中的溶解度低是第一个也是最关键的障碍。此后,大麻素可以通过门静脉进入全身血液循环,这与显著的肝首过代谢(FPM)有关,或通过淋巴吸收绕过它。涉及领域:大麻素的溶解度障碍主要是通过脂基配方解决的,如自纳米乳化药物输送系统(SNEDDS)。某些脂质被用来克服溶解度问题。配方中的表面活性剂和其他添加剂对几个屏障有额外的影响,包括决定淋巴生物利用度和肝脏FPM的程度。胃保留配方也是合理的。专家意见:比较相同的SNEDDS制剂,环孢素和大麻素,当用于提高不同化合物的口服生物利用度时的作用,提出。它说明了相同的SNEDDS获得的一些相似之处和主要的机制差异。因此,对吸收途径的不同影响阐明了了解吸收机制及其障碍对于正确选择适当策略以提高口服生物利用度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategies for enhancing the oral bioavailability of cannabinoids.

Introduction: Oral administration of cannabinoids is a convenient route of administration in many cases. To enhance the poor and variable bioavailability of cannabinoids, selected strategies utilizing proper delivery systems have been designed. Low solubility in the GI aqueous media is the first and most critical barrier. Thereafter, cannabinoids can reach the systemic blood circulation via the portal vein that is associated with significant hepatic first pass metabolism (FPM) or bypass it via lymphatic absorption.

Areas covered: The solubility obstacle of cannabinoids is mainly addressed with lipid-based formulations such as self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS). Certain lipids are used to overcome the solubility issue. Surfactants and other additives in the formulation have additional impact on several barriers, including dictating the degree of lymphatic bioavailability and hepatic FPM. Gastro-retentive formulation is also plausible.

Expert opinion: Comparison of the role of the same SNEDDS formulation, cyclosporine vs. cannabinoids, when used to elevate the oral bioavailability of different compounds, is presented. It illustrates some similarities and major mechanistic differences obtained by the same SNEDDS. Thus, the different influence over the absorption pathway illuminates the importance of understanding the absorption mechanism and its barriers to properly select appropriate strategies to achieve enhanced oral bioavailability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology (ISSN 1742-5255 [print], 1744-7607 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of ADME-Tox. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering metabolic, pharmacokinetic and toxicological issues relating to specific drugs, drug-drug interactions, drug classes or their use in specific populations; issues relating to enzymes involved in the metabolism, disposition and excretion of drugs; techniques involved in the study of drug metabolism and toxicology; novel technologies for obtaining ADME-Tox data. Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical, toxicological and pharmacokinetic data on a particular drug. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacologists, clinical toxicologists and related professionals.
期刊最新文献
A critical need for ‘gut neutrality’: mitigating adverse drug-microbiome interactions Drug interactions in cardiology: focus on statins and their combination with other lipid-lowering drugs Assessing the therapeutic and toxicological profile of novel GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes Clinical pharmacokinetics of glipizide: a systematic review Intraocular drugs: pharmacokinetic strategies and the influence on efficacy and durability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1