羞耻是一种地理哲学的力量。

IF 0.7 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Subjectivity Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-04 DOI:10.1057/s41286-022-00133-8
Aline Wiame
{"title":"羞耻是一种地理哲学的力量。","authors":"Aline Wiame","doi":"10.1057/s41286-022-00133-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, I argue that Deleuze and Guattari's famous trope about \"an earth and a people that are lacking\" in the Geophilosophy chapter of <i>What Is Philosophy?</i> must be examined through a specific assemblage: the necessity for shame-as a powerful, non-psychological, and nonhuman affect-to enter philosophy itself both to resist stupidity and to include all the disfranchised of classical Reason. I then turn to Isabelle Stengers' work against stupidity to determine how this assemblage can help us give shape to new multispecies apparatuses in the face of the Anthropocene. As a conclusion, I show that, through such apparatuses, shame truly becomes a geophilosophical force.</p>","PeriodicalId":46273,"journal":{"name":"Subjectivity","volume":"15 3","pages":"119-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362531/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shame as a geophilosophical force.\",\"authors\":\"Aline Wiame\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41286-022-00133-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this article, I argue that Deleuze and Guattari's famous trope about \\\"an earth and a people that are lacking\\\" in the Geophilosophy chapter of <i>What Is Philosophy?</i> must be examined through a specific assemblage: the necessity for shame-as a powerful, non-psychological, and nonhuman affect-to enter philosophy itself both to resist stupidity and to include all the disfranchised of classical Reason. I then turn to Isabelle Stengers' work against stupidity to determine how this assemblage can help us give shape to new multispecies apparatuses in the face of the Anthropocene. As a conclusion, I show that, through such apparatuses, shame truly becomes a geophilosophical force.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Subjectivity\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"119-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362531/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Subjectivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-022-00133-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Subjectivity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-022-00133-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中,我认为德勒兹和瓜塔里在《什么是哲学?》的地球哲学章节中关于“一个地球和一个缺乏的人”的著名比喻。羞耻——作为一种强大的、非心理的、非人类的情感——进入哲学本身的必要性,既是为了抵制愚蠢,也是为了包容所有被剥夺了经典理性的人。然后,我转向伊莎贝尔·斯坦厄斯(Isabelle Stengers)反对愚蠢的研究,以确定这种组合如何帮助我们在面对人类世(Anthropocene)时塑造新的多物种装置。作为结论,我表明,通过这些工具,羞耻真正成为一种地缘哲学的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shame as a geophilosophical force.

In this article, I argue that Deleuze and Guattari's famous trope about "an earth and a people that are lacking" in the Geophilosophy chapter of What Is Philosophy? must be examined through a specific assemblage: the necessity for shame-as a powerful, non-psychological, and nonhuman affect-to enter philosophy itself both to resist stupidity and to include all the disfranchised of classical Reason. I then turn to Isabelle Stengers' work against stupidity to determine how this assemblage can help us give shape to new multispecies apparatuses in the face of the Anthropocene. As a conclusion, I show that, through such apparatuses, shame truly becomes a geophilosophical force.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Subjectivity
Subjectivity SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Subjectivity is an international, transdisciplinary journal examining the social, cultural, historical and material processes, dynamics and structures of human experience. As topic, problem and resource, notions of subjectivity are relevant to many disciplines, including cultural studies, sociology, social theory, geography, anthropology and psychology. The journal brings together scholars from across the social sciences and the humanities, publishing high-quality theoretical and empirical papers that address the processes by which subjectivities are produced, explore subjectivity as a locus of social change, and examine how emerging subjectivities remake our social worlds.
期刊最新文献
Healthy sexuality—not sexual health: for the sexual subject The pandemic state of exception: restrictions, subjectivities, and authority Sheltered silence: the subjectivity of hiding in Amsterdam during World War II The libidinal law: sexuality and desire in U.S. legal embodiment Fictional subjectivities: introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1