采坑法与林贝格皮瓣法相比,前者治疗朝天鼻窦疾病,后者则采用开放式方法。

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Innovative Surgical Sciences Pub Date : 2022-06-27 eCollection Date: 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1515/iss-2021-0041
Dietrich Doll, Sven Petersen, Octavia Alexandra Andreae, Hanne Matner, Henning Albrecht, Lukas E Brügger, Markus M Luedi, Gero Puhl
{"title":"采坑法与林贝格皮瓣法相比,前者治疗朝天鼻窦疾病,后者则采用开放式方法。","authors":"Dietrich Doll, Sven Petersen, Octavia Alexandra Andreae, Hanne Matner, Henning Albrecht, Lukas E Brügger, Markus M Luedi, Gero Puhl","doi":"10.1515/iss-2021-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) surgery are becoming standard. Although long-term results are available for some techniques, long-term outcome data of patients after pit picking is lacking. We aimed at investigating perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing pit picking, Limberg flap or primary open surgery to treat PSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-centre observational study, we evaluated the outcomes of 327 consecutive patients undergoing PSD surgery between 2011 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSD had recurred in 22% of Limberg flap patients and 62% of pit picking patients at 5 years (p=0.0078; log rank test). Previous pilonidal surgeries, smoking, body mass index, immunodeficiency, and diabetes did not significantly influence the long-term recurrence rate. Primary open treatment was performed for 72% of female patients presenting with primary disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to its especially dismal long-term results, pit picking should be abandoned, and Limberg flap should be promoted instead, even for primary disease and in females.</p>","PeriodicalId":44186,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"23-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pit picking vs. Limberg flap vs. primary open method to treat pilonidal sinus disease - A cohort of 327 consecutive patients.\",\"authors\":\"Dietrich Doll, Sven Petersen, Octavia Alexandra Andreae, Hanne Matner, Henning Albrecht, Lukas E Brügger, Markus M Luedi, Gero Puhl\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/iss-2021-0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) surgery are becoming standard. Although long-term results are available for some techniques, long-term outcome data of patients after pit picking is lacking. We aimed at investigating perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing pit picking, Limberg flap or primary open surgery to treat PSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-centre observational study, we evaluated the outcomes of 327 consecutive patients undergoing PSD surgery between 2011 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSD had recurred in 22% of Limberg flap patients and 62% of pit picking patients at 5 years (p=0.0078; log rank test). Previous pilonidal surgeries, smoking, body mass index, immunodeficiency, and diabetes did not significantly influence the long-term recurrence rate. Primary open treatment was performed for 72% of female patients presenting with primary disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to its especially dismal long-term results, pit picking should be abandoned, and Limberg flap should be promoted instead, even for primary disease and in females.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Surgical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"23-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Surgical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2021-0041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2021-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:朝天鼻窦疾病(PSD)手术的微创方法已成为标准方法。虽然一些技术已经有了长期结果,但还缺乏剔除凹陷后患者的长期疗效数据。我们的目的是调查接受剔坑术、Limberg皮瓣或初次开放手术治疗PSD患者的围手术期和长期疗效:在一项单中心观察性研究中,我们对 2011 年至 2020 年间接受 PSD 手术的 327 名连续患者的疗效进行了评估:结果:5年后,22%的Limberg皮瓣患者和62%的基坑剔除术患者PSD复发(P=0.0078;对数秩检验)。曾接受过朝天鼻手术、吸烟、体重指数、免疫缺陷和糖尿病对长期复发率无明显影响。72%的女性原发性患者接受了初次开放治疗:结论:由于凹陷剔除术的长期效果特别差,因此应放弃这种方法,而改用Limberg皮瓣,即使是原发性疾病和女性患者也应如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pit picking vs. Limberg flap vs. primary open method to treat pilonidal sinus disease - A cohort of 327 consecutive patients.

Background: Minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) surgery are becoming standard. Although long-term results are available for some techniques, long-term outcome data of patients after pit picking is lacking. We aimed at investigating perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing pit picking, Limberg flap or primary open surgery to treat PSD.

Methods: In a single-centre observational study, we evaluated the outcomes of 327 consecutive patients undergoing PSD surgery between 2011 and 2020.

Results: PSD had recurred in 22% of Limberg flap patients and 62% of pit picking patients at 5 years (p=0.0078; log rank test). Previous pilonidal surgeries, smoking, body mass index, immunodeficiency, and diabetes did not significantly influence the long-term recurrence rate. Primary open treatment was performed for 72% of female patients presenting with primary disease.

Conclusions: Due to its especially dismal long-term results, pit picking should be abandoned, and Limberg flap should be promoted instead, even for primary disease and in females.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Periprosthetic joint infections - a scoping review. What's new in surgery? Essentials 2024 - young patients and fast decisions. A narrative review of present knowledge and digital approaches in orthognathic surgery. Update burn surgery: overview of current multidisciplinary treatment concepts. Early enteral nutrition (EEN) following intestinal anastomosis in pediatric patients - what's new?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1