循证实践(EBP)工具(学校版):新跨学科量表的开发和初步心理测量。

Lindsay G Flegge
{"title":"循证实践(EBP)工具(学校版):新跨学科量表的开发和初步心理测量。","authors":"Lindsay G Flegge","doi":"10.1007/s40688-022-00424-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents the psychometric properties of the evidence-based practice (EBP) instrument (School Version), a new interdisciplinary measure for understanding and measuring EBP use that can be understood and used across the three professions who provide the most mental health services in schools. The instrument was developed based on theory, review of the literature, expert review (<i>N</i> = 12), pilot study (<i>N</i> = 20), and national study (<i>N</i> = 303). While the measure may have applicability for other groups of mental health providers in other settings, this study focused on the perspectives of mental health providers in schools, specifically school psychologists, school counselors, and social workers. Initial psychometric examination resulted in a 13-item, one factor model and indicated preliminary evidence for strong validity and internal reliability. No significant difference in total score among groups of mental health professionals was found, suggesting similarities of comprehension and application of EBP regardless of professional discipline. This instrument is the only one of its kind and provides a helpful first step towards common language and common goals when conceptualizing what it means for mental health providers to use best practice. Implications for school professionals and future research are offered.</p>","PeriodicalId":72700,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary school psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Instrument (School Version): Development and Initial Psychometrics of a New Interdisciplinary Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay G Flegge\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40688-022-00424-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article presents the psychometric properties of the evidence-based practice (EBP) instrument (School Version), a new interdisciplinary measure for understanding and measuring EBP use that can be understood and used across the three professions who provide the most mental health services in schools. The instrument was developed based on theory, review of the literature, expert review (<i>N</i> = 12), pilot study (<i>N</i> = 20), and national study (<i>N</i> = 303). While the measure may have applicability for other groups of mental health providers in other settings, this study focused on the perspectives of mental health providers in schools, specifically school psychologists, school counselors, and social workers. Initial psychometric examination resulted in a 13-item, one factor model and indicated preliminary evidence for strong validity and internal reliability. No significant difference in total score among groups of mental health professionals was found, suggesting similarities of comprehension and application of EBP regardless of professional discipline. This instrument is the only one of its kind and provides a helpful first step towards common language and common goals when conceptualizing what it means for mental health providers to use best practice. Implications for school professionals and future research are offered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary school psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285187/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary school psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-022-00424-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary school psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-022-00424-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了循证实践(EBP)工具(学校版)的心理测量特性,这是一种新的跨学科测量方法,用于了解和测量 EBP 的使用情况,可被在学校提供最多心理健康服务的三个专业所理解和使用。该工具的开发基于理论、文献回顾、专家回顾(N = 12)、试点研究(N = 20)和全国性研究(N = 303)。虽然该测量方法可能适用于其他环境下的其他心理健康服务提供者群体,但本研究侧重于学校心理健康服务提供者的观点,特别是学校心理学家、学校辅导员和社会工作者的观点。初步的心理测量学检查得出了一个包含 13 个项目的单因素模型,并初步证明该模型具有很强的有效性和内部可靠性。心理健康专业人员群体之间的总分没有明显差异,这表明,无论专业学科如何,对 EBP 的理解和应用都有相似之处。该工具是同类工具中唯一的一个,它为心理健康服务提供者在概念化使用最佳实践的含义时使用共同语言和实现共同目标迈出了有益的第一步。该工具还为学校专业人员和未来研究提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Instrument (School Version): Development and Initial Psychometrics of a New Interdisciplinary Scale.

This article presents the psychometric properties of the evidence-based practice (EBP) instrument (School Version), a new interdisciplinary measure for understanding and measuring EBP use that can be understood and used across the three professions who provide the most mental health services in schools. The instrument was developed based on theory, review of the literature, expert review (N = 12), pilot study (N = 20), and national study (N = 303). While the measure may have applicability for other groups of mental health providers in other settings, this study focused on the perspectives of mental health providers in schools, specifically school psychologists, school counselors, and social workers. Initial psychometric examination resulted in a 13-item, one factor model and indicated preliminary evidence for strong validity and internal reliability. No significant difference in total score among groups of mental health professionals was found, suggesting similarities of comprehension and application of EBP regardless of professional discipline. This instrument is the only one of its kind and provides a helpful first step towards common language and common goals when conceptualizing what it means for mental health providers to use best practice. Implications for school professionals and future research are offered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Concurrent Validity of the GORT-5 with the WJ-IV Mental Health Screening: Recommendations from an Integrated Literature Review Lessons Learned from LGBTQ + Youths’ Experience in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Phenomenological Investigation Spirituality and Social-Emotional Learning: A Qualitative Examination of Teachers’ Perspectives Measuring School Climate as a Component of School Capacity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1