基于神经网络的全自动心脏静息期检测算法与人工检测的比较。

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2022-10-28 eCollection Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601221137772
Ryo Ogawa, Tomoyuki Kido, Yasuhiro Shiraishi, Yuri Yagi, Seung Su Yoon, Jens Wetzl, Michaela Schmidt, Teruhito Kido
{"title":"基于神经网络的全自动心脏静息期检测算法与人工检测的比较。","authors":"Ryo Ogawa,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Kido,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Shiraishi,&nbsp;Yuri Yagi,&nbsp;Seung Su Yoon,&nbsp;Jens Wetzl,&nbsp;Michaela Schmidt,&nbsp;Teruhito Kido","doi":"10.1177/20584601221137772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A cardiac resting phase is used when performing free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance examinations.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to test a cardiac resting phase detection system based on neural networks in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four chamber-view cine images were obtained from 32 patients and analyzed. The rest duration, start point, and end point were compared between that determined by the experts and general operators, and a similar comparison was done between that determined by the experts and neural networks: the normalized root-mean-square error (RMSE) was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unlike manual detection, the neural network was able to determine the resting phase almost simultaneously as the image was obtained. The rest duration and start point were not significantly different between the neural network and expert (<i>p</i> = .30, .90, respectively), whereas the end point was significantly different between the two groups (<i>p</i> < .05). The start point was not significantly different between the general operator and expert (<i>p</i> = .09), whereas the rest duration and end point were significantly different between the two groups (<i>p</i> < .05). The normalized RMSEs of the rest duration, start point, and end point of the neural network were 0.88, 0.64, and 0.33 ms, respectively, which were lower than those of the general operator (normalized RMSE values were 0.98, 0.68, and 0.51 ms, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The neural network can determine the resting phase instantly with better accuracy than the manual detection of general operators.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/ee/10.1177_20584601221137772.PMC9619276.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural network-based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Ogawa,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Kido,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Shiraishi,&nbsp;Yuri Yagi,&nbsp;Seung Su Yoon,&nbsp;Jens Wetzl,&nbsp;Michaela Schmidt,&nbsp;Teruhito Kido\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20584601221137772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A cardiac resting phase is used when performing free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance examinations.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to test a cardiac resting phase detection system based on neural networks in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four chamber-view cine images were obtained from 32 patients and analyzed. The rest duration, start point, and end point were compared between that determined by the experts and general operators, and a similar comparison was done between that determined by the experts and neural networks: the normalized root-mean-square error (RMSE) was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unlike manual detection, the neural network was able to determine the resting phase almost simultaneously as the image was obtained. The rest duration and start point were not significantly different between the neural network and expert (<i>p</i> = .30, .90, respectively), whereas the end point was significantly different between the two groups (<i>p</i> < .05). The start point was not significantly different between the general operator and expert (<i>p</i> = .09), whereas the rest duration and end point were significantly different between the two groups (<i>p</i> < .05). The normalized RMSEs of the rest duration, start point, and end point of the neural network were 0.88, 0.64, and 0.33 ms, respectively, which were lower than those of the general operator (normalized RMSE values were 0.98, 0.68, and 0.51 ms, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The neural network can determine the resting phase instantly with better accuracy than the manual detection of general operators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/ee/10.1177_20584601221137772.PMC9619276.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601221137772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601221137772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在进行自由呼吸心脏磁共振检查时使用心脏静息期。目的:研究基于神经网络的心脏静息期检测系统的临床应用。材料与方法:对32例患者的4张腔镜影像进行分析。将专家确定的休息时间、起点和终点与一般算子确定的休息时间、起点和终点进行比较,并将专家确定的休息时间、起点和终点与神经网络确定的休息时间进行类似的比较,并计算归一化均方根误差(RMSE)。结果:与人工检测不同,神经网络几乎可以在获得图像的同时确定静息期。神经网络与专家的休息时间、起始点差异无统计学意义(p分别为0.30、0.90),而两组的结束点差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。一般操作者和专家的起始点差异无统计学意义(p = .09),而两组的休息时间和终点差异有统计学意义(p < .05)。神经网络的休息时间、起点和终点的归一化RMSE分别为0.88、0.64和0.33 ms,均低于一般算子(归一化RMSE分别为0.98、0.68和0.51 ms)。结论:神经网络可以即时确定静息相位,比一般操作员的人工检测准确率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neural network-based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients.

Background: A cardiac resting phase is used when performing free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance examinations.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test a cardiac resting phase detection system based on neural networks in clinical practice.

Material and methods: Four chamber-view cine images were obtained from 32 patients and analyzed. The rest duration, start point, and end point were compared between that determined by the experts and general operators, and a similar comparison was done between that determined by the experts and neural networks: the normalized root-mean-square error (RMSE) was also calculated.

Results: Unlike manual detection, the neural network was able to determine the resting phase almost simultaneously as the image was obtained. The rest duration and start point were not significantly different between the neural network and expert (p = .30, .90, respectively), whereas the end point was significantly different between the two groups (p < .05). The start point was not significantly different between the general operator and expert (p = .09), whereas the rest duration and end point were significantly different between the two groups (p < .05). The normalized RMSEs of the rest duration, start point, and end point of the neural network were 0.88, 0.64, and 0.33 ms, respectively, which were lower than those of the general operator (normalized RMSE values were 0.98, 0.68, and 0.51 ms, respectively).

Conclusions: The neural network can determine the resting phase instantly with better accuracy than the manual detection of general operators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Invasive trigeminal ganglioneuroma: A case report and review of the literature. A case of primary osteosarcoma in the occipital bone: A relatively common tumor in an uncommon location. To biopsy or not to biopsy adrenal mass: is that the question? Hemodynamic evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: Pre- and post-treatment 2D phase-contrast MRI measurements. Lipomatous pseudohypertrophy of the pancreas mimicking liposarcoma: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1