在厄立特里亚中部地区,护士从业人员对免疫接种后不良事件的认识和报告障碍:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Pub Date : 2022-07-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S363925
Nuru Abdu, Asmerom Mosazghi, Tedros Yehdego, Eyasu H Tesfamariam, Mulugeta Russom
{"title":"在厄立特里亚中部地区,护士从业人员对免疫接种后不良事件的认识和报告障碍:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Nuru Abdu,&nbsp;Asmerom Mosazghi,&nbsp;Tedros Yehdego,&nbsp;Eyasu H Tesfamariam,&nbsp;Mulugeta Russom","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S363925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though vaccines are generally considered extremely safe and effective, they have been associated with some serious adverse events following immunization (AEFIs). AEFIs might be related to either the vaccine, immunization error, anxiety related to immunization, and/or coincidental events. If they are not reported and investigated in timely fashion, they can create rumors and confidence gaps. In the last few years, reporting AEFIs in the Central Region of Eritrea, compared to other regions, has been found to be very low, with the root cause for this variation unknown, making intervention strategies challenging. This study was conducted to assess nurse practitioners' knowledge and perceptions on AEFI surveillance and barriers to reporting in the region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among all nurse practitioners who were directly or indirectly involved in immunization services working in all health facilities of the region. Data were collected between October 2019 and February 2020 using an interview-based questionnaire. Percentages and medians (IQR) were used as descriptive statistics, and Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used as inferential tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 respondents with a median age of 40 (IQR 23) years were included in the study. The overall median (IQR) knowledge score of the respondents on AEFI surveillance was 87.50 (19) out of 100. Furthermore, median (IQR) comprehensive perception score was 70 (20) out of 100 (range 40-95). Shortage of motivation and not knowing how to report were identified as the main barriers to reporting AEFIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowledge and perceptions of nurse practitioners in the Central Region on AEFI surveillance were generally encouraging. They should however need to be further trained on the basics of AEFI surveillance to bridge the identified barriers to reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/50/dhps-14-125.PMC9338432.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and Perceptions of Nurse Practitioners on Adverse Events Following Immunization and Barriers to Reporting in the Central Region, Eritrea: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nuru Abdu,&nbsp;Asmerom Mosazghi,&nbsp;Tedros Yehdego,&nbsp;Eyasu H Tesfamariam,&nbsp;Mulugeta Russom\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DHPS.S363925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though vaccines are generally considered extremely safe and effective, they have been associated with some serious adverse events following immunization (AEFIs). AEFIs might be related to either the vaccine, immunization error, anxiety related to immunization, and/or coincidental events. If they are not reported and investigated in timely fashion, they can create rumors and confidence gaps. In the last few years, reporting AEFIs in the Central Region of Eritrea, compared to other regions, has been found to be very low, with the root cause for this variation unknown, making intervention strategies challenging. This study was conducted to assess nurse practitioners' knowledge and perceptions on AEFI surveillance and barriers to reporting in the region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among all nurse practitioners who were directly or indirectly involved in immunization services working in all health facilities of the region. Data were collected between October 2019 and February 2020 using an interview-based questionnaire. Percentages and medians (IQR) were used as descriptive statistics, and Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used as inferential tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 respondents with a median age of 40 (IQR 23) years were included in the study. The overall median (IQR) knowledge score of the respondents on AEFI surveillance was 87.50 (19) out of 100. Furthermore, median (IQR) comprehensive perception score was 70 (20) out of 100 (range 40-95). Shortage of motivation and not knowing how to report were identified as the main barriers to reporting AEFIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowledge and perceptions of nurse practitioners in the Central Region on AEFI surveillance were generally encouraging. They should however need to be further trained on the basics of AEFI surveillance to bridge the identified barriers to reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/50/dhps-14-125.PMC9338432.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S363925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S363925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:虽然疫苗通常被认为是非常安全有效的,但它们与免疫后的一些严重不良事件(AEFIs)有关。aefi可能与疫苗、免疫错误、免疫相关焦虑和/或巧合事件有关。如果不及时报告和调查,就会造成谣言和信心缺口。在过去几年中,与其他地区相比,厄立特里亚中部地区报告的aefi非常低,造成这种差异的根本原因尚不清楚,这使得干预策略具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估护士从业人员对AEFI监测的知识和看法,以及该地区报告的障碍。方法:在该地区所有卫生设施中直接或间接参与免疫服务工作的所有执业护士中进行了一项分析性横断面研究。数据是在2019年10月至2020年2月期间通过访谈问卷收集的。采用百分比和中位数(IQR)作为描述性统计,采用Mann-Whitney检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验作为推理工具。结果:共纳入130名受访者,中位年龄为40 (IQR 23)岁。应答者对AEFI监测的总体知识中位数(IQR)得分为87.50(19)分(满分100分)。此外,中位(IQR)综合感知评分为70(20)分(范围40-95)。缺乏动机和不知道如何报告被认为是报告aefi的主要障碍。结论:中部地区执业护士对急性脑损伤监测的认识和认知总体上令人鼓舞。然而,他们应该进一步接受有关AEFI监测基础知识的培训,以消除已确定的报告障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge and Perceptions of Nurse Practitioners on Adverse Events Following Immunization and Barriers to Reporting in the Central Region, Eritrea: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Though vaccines are generally considered extremely safe and effective, they have been associated with some serious adverse events following immunization (AEFIs). AEFIs might be related to either the vaccine, immunization error, anxiety related to immunization, and/or coincidental events. If they are not reported and investigated in timely fashion, they can create rumors and confidence gaps. In the last few years, reporting AEFIs in the Central Region of Eritrea, compared to other regions, has been found to be very low, with the root cause for this variation unknown, making intervention strategies challenging. This study was conducted to assess nurse practitioners' knowledge and perceptions on AEFI surveillance and barriers to reporting in the region.

Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among all nurse practitioners who were directly or indirectly involved in immunization services working in all health facilities of the region. Data were collected between October 2019 and February 2020 using an interview-based questionnaire. Percentages and medians (IQR) were used as descriptive statistics, and Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used as inferential tools.

Results: A total of 130 respondents with a median age of 40 (IQR 23) years were included in the study. The overall median (IQR) knowledge score of the respondents on AEFI surveillance was 87.50 (19) out of 100. Furthermore, median (IQR) comprehensive perception score was 70 (20) out of 100 (range 40-95). Shortage of motivation and not knowing how to report were identified as the main barriers to reporting AEFIs.

Conclusion: Knowledge and perceptions of nurse practitioners in the Central Region on AEFI surveillance were generally encouraging. They should however need to be further trained on the basics of AEFI surveillance to bridge the identified barriers to reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Heart Failure Patient with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Single Center Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Response to Letter]. Baloxavir Resistance Markers in Influenza A and B Viruses in the Americas. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Letter]. Adverse Drug Reactions Related with Antibiotic Medicines in Malawi: A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence and Associated Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1