一个优化的前列腺活检策略患者单侧病变的前列腺磁共振成像避免不必要的活检。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2022-07-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562872221111410
Auke Jager, Luigi A M J G van Riel, Arnoud W Postema, Theo M de Reijke, Tim M van der Sluis, Jorg R Oddens
{"title":"一个优化的前列腺活检策略患者单侧病变的前列腺磁共振成像避免不必要的活检。","authors":"Auke Jager,&nbsp;Luigi A M J G van Riel,&nbsp;Arnoud W Postema,&nbsp;Theo M de Reijke,&nbsp;Tim M van der Sluis,&nbsp;Jorg R Oddens","doi":"10.1177/17562872221111410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) besides systematic prostate biopsies has resulted in a discussion on what the optimal prostate biopsy strategy is. The ideal template has high sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), while reducing the detection rate of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (iPCa). This study evaluates different biopsy strategies in patients with a unilateral prostate MRI lesion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective subgroup analysis of a prospectively managed database consisting of patients undergoing prostate biopsy in two academic centres. Patients with a unilateral lesion (PI-RADS ⩾ 3) on MRI were included for analysis. The primary objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance for different biopsy approaches compared with bilateral systematic prostate biopsy (SBx) and TBx. Detection rates for csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 2), adjusted csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 3) and iPCa (ISUP = 1) were determined for SBx alone, TBx alone, contralateral SBx combined with TBx and ipsilateral SBx combined with TBx. A subgroup analysis was performed for biopsy-naive patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 228 patients were included from October 2015 to September 2021. Prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate of combined SBx and TBx was 63.5% for csPCa, 35.5% for adjusted csPCa, and 14% for iPCa. The best performing alternative biopsy strategy was TBx and ipsilateral SBx, which reached a sensitivity of 98.6% (95% CI: 95.1-99.6) for csPCa and 98.8% (95% CI: 96.3-99.9) for adjusted csPCa, missing only 1.4% of csPCa, while reducing iPCa detection by 15.6% compared with SBx and TBx. TBx or SBx alone missed a significant amount of csPCa, with sensitivities of 90.3% (95% CI: 84.4-94.2) and 86.8% (95% CI: 80.4-91.4) for csPCa. Subgroup analysis on biopsy-naive patients showed similar results as the overall group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that performing TBx with ipsilateral SBx and omitting contralateral SBx is the optimal biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral MRI lesion. With this strategy, a very limited amount of csPCa is missed and iPCa detection is reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/2b/10.1177_17562872221111410.PMC9340407.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An optimized prostate biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral lesion on prostate magnetic resonance imaging avoids unnecessary biopsies.\",\"authors\":\"Auke Jager,&nbsp;Luigi A M J G van Riel,&nbsp;Arnoud W Postema,&nbsp;Theo M de Reijke,&nbsp;Tim M van der Sluis,&nbsp;Jorg R Oddens\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562872221111410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) besides systematic prostate biopsies has resulted in a discussion on what the optimal prostate biopsy strategy is. The ideal template has high sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), while reducing the detection rate of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (iPCa). This study evaluates different biopsy strategies in patients with a unilateral prostate MRI lesion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective subgroup analysis of a prospectively managed database consisting of patients undergoing prostate biopsy in two academic centres. Patients with a unilateral lesion (PI-RADS ⩾ 3) on MRI were included for analysis. The primary objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance for different biopsy approaches compared with bilateral systematic prostate biopsy (SBx) and TBx. Detection rates for csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 2), adjusted csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 3) and iPCa (ISUP = 1) were determined for SBx alone, TBx alone, contralateral SBx combined with TBx and ipsilateral SBx combined with TBx. A subgroup analysis was performed for biopsy-naive patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 228 patients were included from October 2015 to September 2021. Prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate of combined SBx and TBx was 63.5% for csPCa, 35.5% for adjusted csPCa, and 14% for iPCa. The best performing alternative biopsy strategy was TBx and ipsilateral SBx, which reached a sensitivity of 98.6% (95% CI: 95.1-99.6) for csPCa and 98.8% (95% CI: 96.3-99.9) for adjusted csPCa, missing only 1.4% of csPCa, while reducing iPCa detection by 15.6% compared with SBx and TBx. TBx or SBx alone missed a significant amount of csPCa, with sensitivities of 90.3% (95% CI: 84.4-94.2) and 86.8% (95% CI: 80.4-91.4) for csPCa. Subgroup analysis on biopsy-naive patients showed similar results as the overall group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that performing TBx with ipsilateral SBx and omitting contralateral SBx is the optimal biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral MRI lesion. With this strategy, a very limited amount of csPCa is missed and iPCa detection is reduced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/2b/10.1177_17562872221111410.PMC9340407.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221111410\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221111410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在系统前列腺活检的基础上引入磁共振成像(MRI)靶向活检(TBx),引起了对最佳前列腺活检策略的讨论。理想模板对临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)具有较高的敏感性,同时降低了临床不显著性前列腺癌(iPCa)的检出率。本研究评估了单侧前列腺MRI病变患者的不同活检策略。方法:回顾性亚组分析前瞻性管理数据库,包括在两个学术中心接受前列腺活检的患者。MRI上单侧病变(PI-RADS大于或等于3)的患者被纳入分析。主要目的是评估不同活检方法与双侧系统前列腺活检(SBx)和TBx的诊断性能。确定单独SBx、单独TBx、对侧SBx联合TBx和同侧SBx联合TBx的csPCa (ISUP小于或等于2)、调整后的csPCa (ISUP小于或等于3)和iPCa (ISUP = 1)的检出率。对未进行活检的患者进行亚组分析。结果:2015年10月至2021年9月共纳入228例患者。csPCa的前列腺癌(PCa)检出率为63.5%,调整后的csPCa为35.5%,iPCa为14%。最佳的替代活检策略是TBx和同侧SBx,对csPCa的敏感性为98.6% (95% CI: 95.1-99.6),对调整后的csPCa的敏感性为98.8% (95% CI: 96.3-99.9),仅遗漏了1.4%的csPCa,而与SBx和TBx相比,iPCa的检出率降低了15.6%。TBx或单独SBx对csPCa的敏感性分别为90.3% (95% CI: 84.4-94.2)和86.8% (95% CI: 80.4-91.4)。首次活检患者的亚组分析显示与整体组相似的结果。结论:本研究表明,对单侧MRI病变患者行同侧SBx行TBx,而不行对侧SBx是最佳的活检策略。使用这种策略,csPCa的数量非常有限,iPCa的检测也减少了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An optimized prostate biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral lesion on prostate magnetic resonance imaging avoids unnecessary biopsies.

Purpose: The introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) besides systematic prostate biopsies has resulted in a discussion on what the optimal prostate biopsy strategy is. The ideal template has high sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), while reducing the detection rate of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (iPCa). This study evaluates different biopsy strategies in patients with a unilateral prostate MRI lesion.

Methods: Retrospective subgroup analysis of a prospectively managed database consisting of patients undergoing prostate biopsy in two academic centres. Patients with a unilateral lesion (PI-RADS ⩾ 3) on MRI were included for analysis. The primary objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance for different biopsy approaches compared with bilateral systematic prostate biopsy (SBx) and TBx. Detection rates for csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 2), adjusted csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 3) and iPCa (ISUP = 1) were determined for SBx alone, TBx alone, contralateral SBx combined with TBx and ipsilateral SBx combined with TBx. A subgroup analysis was performed for biopsy-naive patients.

Results: A total of 228 patients were included from October 2015 to September 2021. Prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate of combined SBx and TBx was 63.5% for csPCa, 35.5% for adjusted csPCa, and 14% for iPCa. The best performing alternative biopsy strategy was TBx and ipsilateral SBx, which reached a sensitivity of 98.6% (95% CI: 95.1-99.6) for csPCa and 98.8% (95% CI: 96.3-99.9) for adjusted csPCa, missing only 1.4% of csPCa, while reducing iPCa detection by 15.6% compared with SBx and TBx. TBx or SBx alone missed a significant amount of csPCa, with sensitivities of 90.3% (95% CI: 84.4-94.2) and 86.8% (95% CI: 80.4-91.4) for csPCa. Subgroup analysis on biopsy-naive patients showed similar results as the overall group.

Conclusion: This study shows that performing TBx with ipsilateral SBx and omitting contralateral SBx is the optimal biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral MRI lesion. With this strategy, a very limited amount of csPCa is missed and iPCa detection is reduced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.
期刊最新文献
Clinical use of nadofaragene firadenovec-vncg Effect of surgical, medical, and behavioral weight loss on hormonal and sexual function in men: a contemporary narrative review Proceedings from the Second International Urology Cancer Summit, 27th September, Portsmouth, UK PARP inhibitors alone or in combination for prostate cancer. Comparison of ureteoroscopy and laser stone fragmentation between Holmium: YAG laser with MOSES versus non-MOSES technology: a prospective single-center propensity score-matched analysis using similar laser settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1