PI-RADS v2.1评分3类病变管理的双变量或多变量预测模型中的病变体积

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Turkish journal of urology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.5152/tud.2022.22038
Eugenio Martorana, Maria Cristina Aisa, Riccardo Grisanti, Nicola Santini, Giacomo Maria Pirola, Alessandro Datti, Sandro Gerli, Alessandra Bonora, Aldo Burani, Giovanni Battista Scalera, Pietro Scialpi, Aldo Di Blasi, Michele Scialpi
{"title":"PI-RADS v2.1评分3类病变管理的双变量或多变量预测模型中的病变体积","authors":"Eugenio Martorana,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Aisa,&nbsp;Riccardo Grisanti,&nbsp;Nicola Santini,&nbsp;Giacomo Maria Pirola,&nbsp;Alessandro Datti,&nbsp;Sandro Gerli,&nbsp;Alessandra Bonora,&nbsp;Aldo Burani,&nbsp;Giovanni Battista Scalera,&nbsp;Pietro Scialpi,&nbsp;Aldo Di Blasi,&nbsp;Michele Scialpi","doi":"10.5152/tud.2022.22038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed at improving the discrimination of Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) score 3 suspicious prostate cancer lesions using lesion volume evaluation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Two hundred five PI-RADS v2.1 score 3 lesions were submitted to transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy. The lesion volumes were estimated on diffusion-weighted imaging sequence and distributed in PI-RADS 3a (LV < 0.5 mL) and PI-RADS 3b (LV ≥ 0.5 mL) subcategories, using a 0.5 mL cutoff value. Data were retrospectively matched with histopathological findings from the biopsy. Assuming that lesions with LV < or ≥ 0.5 mL were respectively not eligible (benign and indolent PCa lesions) or eligible for biopsy (significant PCa lesions), the diagnostic accuracy of lesion volume in determining clinically significant PCa at biopsy was evaluated using a bi- or multivariate model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 55.1% and 44.9% of lesions were distributed in subcategories 3a and 3b, respectively. The overall PI-RADS score 3 detection rate was 273%. 3.5% (1.95% of total), and 25% (11.7% of total) significant PCa were found in PI-RADS 3a and 3b subcategory, respectively. The method showed 85.2% sensitivity, 61.2% specificity, 25% positive predictive value, and 96.5% negative predictive value and avoided 55.1% of unnecessary biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy in determining significant PCa at biopsy was 73.2% or 86.5% depending on whether lesion volume was used alone or in combination with prostate volume and patient age in a multivariate model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>0.5 mL lesion volume cutoff value significantly discriminates fusion-targeted biopsy need in PI-RADS v2.1 score 3 lesions and its diagnostic accuracy improves when it combines with prostate volume and age in a multivariate model.</p>","PeriodicalId":23366,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612700/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lesion Volume in a Bi- or Multivariate Prediction Model for the Management of PI-RADS v2.1 Score 3 Category Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Eugenio Martorana,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Aisa,&nbsp;Riccardo Grisanti,&nbsp;Nicola Santini,&nbsp;Giacomo Maria Pirola,&nbsp;Alessandro Datti,&nbsp;Sandro Gerli,&nbsp;Alessandra Bonora,&nbsp;Aldo Burani,&nbsp;Giovanni Battista Scalera,&nbsp;Pietro Scialpi,&nbsp;Aldo Di Blasi,&nbsp;Michele Scialpi\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/tud.2022.22038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed at improving the discrimination of Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) score 3 suspicious prostate cancer lesions using lesion volume evaluation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Two hundred five PI-RADS v2.1 score 3 lesions were submitted to transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy. The lesion volumes were estimated on diffusion-weighted imaging sequence and distributed in PI-RADS 3a (LV < 0.5 mL) and PI-RADS 3b (LV ≥ 0.5 mL) subcategories, using a 0.5 mL cutoff value. Data were retrospectively matched with histopathological findings from the biopsy. Assuming that lesions with LV < or ≥ 0.5 mL were respectively not eligible (benign and indolent PCa lesions) or eligible for biopsy (significant PCa lesions), the diagnostic accuracy of lesion volume in determining clinically significant PCa at biopsy was evaluated using a bi- or multivariate model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 55.1% and 44.9% of lesions were distributed in subcategories 3a and 3b, respectively. The overall PI-RADS score 3 detection rate was 273%. 3.5% (1.95% of total), and 25% (11.7% of total) significant PCa were found in PI-RADS 3a and 3b subcategory, respectively. The method showed 85.2% sensitivity, 61.2% specificity, 25% positive predictive value, and 96.5% negative predictive value and avoided 55.1% of unnecessary biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy in determining significant PCa at biopsy was 73.2% or 86.5% depending on whether lesion volume was used alone or in combination with prostate volume and patient age in a multivariate model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>0.5 mL lesion volume cutoff value significantly discriminates fusion-targeted biopsy need in PI-RADS v2.1 score 3 lesions and its diagnostic accuracy improves when it combines with prostate volume and age in a multivariate model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612700/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.22038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.22038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本研究旨在提高前列腺影像学报告与数据系统2.1版(PI-RADS v2.1)对3个可疑前列腺癌病变进行病灶体积评价的鉴别能力。材料与方法:225例PI-RADS v2.1评分3分病变行经会阴MRI/TRUS融合活检。根据弥散加权成像序列估计病变体积,并以0.5 mL为截止值,将其分为PI-RADS 3a (LV < 0.5 mL)和PI-RADS 3b (LV≥0.5 mL)亚类。回顾性分析数据与活检的组织病理学结果相匹配。假设LV <或≥0.5 mL的病变分别不符合条件(良性和惰性PCa病变)或符合条件(显著性PCa病变),病变体积在活检中确定临床显著性PCa的诊断准确性使用双或多变量模型进行评估。结果:分别有55.1%和44.9%的病变分布在3a和3b亚类中。总PI-RADS评分3检出率为273%。在PI-RADS 3a和3b亚类中分别发现3.5%(占总1.95%)和25%(占总11.7%)显著PCa。该方法敏感性85.2%,特异性61.2%,阳性预测值25%,阴性预测值96.5%,避免55.1%的不必要活检。在一个多变量模型中,根据病变体积是单独使用还是与前列腺体积和患者年龄联合使用,在活检中确定显著性前列腺癌的诊断准确率为73.2%或86.5%。结论:在PI-RADS v2.1分3分病变中,0.5 mL病灶体积临界值可显著区分融合靶向活检需要,在多变量模型中,结合前列腺体积和年龄可提高其诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lesion Volume in a Bi- or Multivariate Prediction Model for the Management of PI-RADS v2.1 Score 3 Category Lesions.

Objective: This study aimed at improving the discrimination of Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) score 3 suspicious prostate cancer lesions using lesion volume evaluation.

Material and methods: Two hundred five PI-RADS v2.1 score 3 lesions were submitted to transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy. The lesion volumes were estimated on diffusion-weighted imaging sequence and distributed in PI-RADS 3a (LV < 0.5 mL) and PI-RADS 3b (LV ≥ 0.5 mL) subcategories, using a 0.5 mL cutoff value. Data were retrospectively matched with histopathological findings from the biopsy. Assuming that lesions with LV < or ≥ 0.5 mL were respectively not eligible (benign and indolent PCa lesions) or eligible for biopsy (significant PCa lesions), the diagnostic accuracy of lesion volume in determining clinically significant PCa at biopsy was evaluated using a bi- or multivariate model.

Results: About 55.1% and 44.9% of lesions were distributed in subcategories 3a and 3b, respectively. The overall PI-RADS score 3 detection rate was 273%. 3.5% (1.95% of total), and 25% (11.7% of total) significant PCa were found in PI-RADS 3a and 3b subcategory, respectively. The method showed 85.2% sensitivity, 61.2% specificity, 25% positive predictive value, and 96.5% negative predictive value and avoided 55.1% of unnecessary biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy in determining significant PCa at biopsy was 73.2% or 86.5% depending on whether lesion volume was used alone or in combination with prostate volume and patient age in a multivariate model.

Conclusion: 0.5 mL lesion volume cutoff value significantly discriminates fusion-targeted biopsy need in PI-RADS v2.1 score 3 lesions and its diagnostic accuracy improves when it combines with prostate volume and age in a multivariate model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish journal of urology
Turkish journal of urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The aim of the Turkish Journal of Urology is to contribute to the literature by publishing scientifically high-quality research articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and case reports. The journal’s target audience includes, urology specialists, medical specialty fellows and other specialists and practitioners who are interested in the field of urology.
期刊最新文献
Infertility as a Proxy of Men's Health: Still a Long Way to Go. Strategies in Infertile Azoospermic Patients with Negative Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Surgery. General Management of Female Sexual Dysfunction for Urologists. Strategies to Increase Testosterone in Men Seeking Fertility. Do Sleep Disorders Influence the Prognosis and the Response to the Therapy in Enuretic Children?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1