使用有序回归分析外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者面部骨折的模式:一项为期五年的回顾性研究。

IF 3.1 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES AIMS Neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-07-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3934/Neuroscience.2022019
Mohamad Arif Awang Nawi, Nor Farid Mohd Noor, Ramizu Shaari, Ameera Kamal Khaleel, Muhamamd Amirul Mat Lazin, Ibrahim Mohammed Sulaiman, Mustafa Mamat
{"title":"使用有序回归分析外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者面部骨折的模式:一项为期五年的回顾性研究。","authors":"Mohamad Arif Awang Nawi,&nbsp;Nor Farid Mohd Noor,&nbsp;Ramizu Shaari,&nbsp;Ameera Kamal Khaleel,&nbsp;Muhamamd Amirul Mat Lazin,&nbsp;Ibrahim Mohammed Sulaiman,&nbsp;Mustafa Mamat","doi":"10.3934/Neuroscience.2022019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the World Health Organization (WHO), traumatic brain injury (TBI) will mainly contribute to disability and death by 2020. Facial fractures associated with TBI are a significant public health concern worldwide. The main etiological factors are road traffic accidents, violence, and falls. Neurological injury associated with facial fractures has been reported to be as high as 76%. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated facial fracture patterns in patients with a traumatic brain injury in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia and evaluated their associations in our study. Ordinal regression was used to examine the facial fracture patterns in patients with traumatic brain injuries. The confounding variables were controlled using ordinal regression analysis, and probabilities of <i>p</i> < 0.1 were considered significant associations. The results found that zygomatic arch fracture -1.141 (95% CI, -2.487 to 0.204, p-value = 0.096), Le Fort II fracture -1.080 (95% CI, -2.138 to -0.022, p-value = 0.045), maxillary bone fracture 2.924 (95% CI, 1.784 to 4.063, p-value .001), nasal bone fracture 4.047 (95% CI, 1.243 to 6.851, p-value = 0.005), and mandibular bone fracture 1.501 (95% CI, 0.711 to 2.291, p-value .001) were the most common facial fracture types associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study provides valuable data for creating prevention plans and gives a chance to discover the epidemiology, prevalence, and connection between TBI and facial fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":7732,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Neuroscience","volume":"9 3","pages":"345-357"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The patterns of facial fractures in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients using ordinal regression: a retrospective study of five years.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamad Arif Awang Nawi,&nbsp;Nor Farid Mohd Noor,&nbsp;Ramizu Shaari,&nbsp;Ameera Kamal Khaleel,&nbsp;Muhamamd Amirul Mat Lazin,&nbsp;Ibrahim Mohammed Sulaiman,&nbsp;Mustafa Mamat\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/Neuroscience.2022019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>According to the World Health Organization (WHO), traumatic brain injury (TBI) will mainly contribute to disability and death by 2020. Facial fractures associated with TBI are a significant public health concern worldwide. The main etiological factors are road traffic accidents, violence, and falls. Neurological injury associated with facial fractures has been reported to be as high as 76%. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated facial fracture patterns in patients with a traumatic brain injury in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia and evaluated their associations in our study. Ordinal regression was used to examine the facial fracture patterns in patients with traumatic brain injuries. The confounding variables were controlled using ordinal regression analysis, and probabilities of <i>p</i> < 0.1 were considered significant associations. The results found that zygomatic arch fracture -1.141 (95% CI, -2.487 to 0.204, p-value = 0.096), Le Fort II fracture -1.080 (95% CI, -2.138 to -0.022, p-value = 0.045), maxillary bone fracture 2.924 (95% CI, 1.784 to 4.063, p-value .001), nasal bone fracture 4.047 (95% CI, 1.243 to 6.851, p-value = 0.005), and mandibular bone fracture 1.501 (95% CI, 0.711 to 2.291, p-value .001) were the most common facial fracture types associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study provides valuable data for creating prevention plans and gives a chance to discover the epidemiology, prevalence, and connection between TBI and facial fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIMS Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"345-357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIMS Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2022019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2022019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据世界卫生组织(世卫组织)的数据,到2020年,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)将是导致残疾和死亡的主要原因。创伤性脑损伤相关的面部骨折是世界范围内一个重要的公共卫生问题。主要的病因是道路交通事故、暴力和跌倒。据报道,与面部骨折相关的神经损伤高达76%。因此,我们回顾性地评估了马来西亚圣大医院外伤性脑损伤患者的面部骨折模式,并在我们的研究中评估了它们之间的关联。采用有序回归方法对外伤性脑损伤患者的面部骨折模式进行研究。使用有序回归分析控制混杂变量,p < 0.1的概率被认为是显著关联。结果发现,颧骨弓骨折-1.141 (95% CI, -2.487 ~ 0.204, p值= 0.096)、Le Fort II骨折-1.080 (95% CI, -2.138 ~ -0.022, p值= 0.045)、上颌骨折2.924 (95% CI, 1.784 ~ 4.063, p值0.001)、鼻骨折4.047 (95% CI, 1.243 ~ 6.851, p值= 0.005)、下颌骨骨折1.501 (95% CI, 0.711 ~ 2.291, p值0.001)是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)最常见的面部骨折类型。本研究为制定预防计划提供了有价值的数据,并为发现脑外伤与面部骨折之间的流行病学、患病率和联系提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The patterns of facial fractures in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients using ordinal regression: a retrospective study of five years.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), traumatic brain injury (TBI) will mainly contribute to disability and death by 2020. Facial fractures associated with TBI are a significant public health concern worldwide. The main etiological factors are road traffic accidents, violence, and falls. Neurological injury associated with facial fractures has been reported to be as high as 76%. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated facial fracture patterns in patients with a traumatic brain injury in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia and evaluated their associations in our study. Ordinal regression was used to examine the facial fracture patterns in patients with traumatic brain injuries. The confounding variables were controlled using ordinal regression analysis, and probabilities of p < 0.1 were considered significant associations. The results found that zygomatic arch fracture -1.141 (95% CI, -2.487 to 0.204, p-value = 0.096), Le Fort II fracture -1.080 (95% CI, -2.138 to -0.022, p-value = 0.045), maxillary bone fracture 2.924 (95% CI, 1.784 to 4.063, p-value .001), nasal bone fracture 4.047 (95% CI, 1.243 to 6.851, p-value = 0.005), and mandibular bone fracture 1.501 (95% CI, 0.711 to 2.291, p-value .001) were the most common facial fracture types associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study provides valuable data for creating prevention plans and gives a chance to discover the epidemiology, prevalence, and connection between TBI and facial fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Neuroscience
AIMS Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: AIMS Neuroscience is an international Open Access journal devoted to publishing peer-reviewed, high quality, original papers from all areas in the field of neuroscience. The primary focus is to provide a forum in which to expedite the speed with which theoretical neuroscience progresses toward generating testable hypotheses. In the presence of current and developing technology that offers unprecedented access to functions of the nervous system at all levels, the journal is designed to serve the role of providing the widest variety of the best theoretical views leading to suggested studies. Single blind peer review is provided for all articles and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Vagus nerve stimulation in dementia: A scoping review of clinical and pre-clinical studies. The potential of exosomal biomarkers: Revolutionizing Parkinson's disease: How do they influence pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic strategies? The effects of right temporoparietal junction stimulation on embodiment, presence, and performance in teleoperation. Cognitive effects of brief and intensive neurofeedback treatment in schizophrenia: a single center pilot study. Novel perspective of therapeutic modules to overcome motor and nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1