肢体残疾儿童、家长和物理治疗师对助行器的使用及其增加体育活动的潜力的看法。定性探索。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Child Health Care Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-17 DOI:10.1177/13674935221117868
Marilyn Bradbury, Stephanie Tierney
{"title":"肢体残疾儿童、家长和物理治疗师对助行器的使用及其增加体育活动的潜力的看法。定性探索。","authors":"Marilyn Bradbury, Stephanie Tierney","doi":"10.1177/13674935221117868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children with physical disabilities are less physically active than children with typical development. How children's experiences of using walkers relates to their physical activity has not been studied previously. This study aimed to explore perspectives of walker use and their potential to increase physical activity. Four focus groups were conducted with children aged 7-10 (<i>n</i> = 3; 12.5%), aged 9-12 (<i>n</i> = 4; 16.7%), parents (<i>n</i> = 7; 29.2%) and paediatric physiotherapists (<i>n</i> = 10; 41.7%). Groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using framework analysis. An overarching concept of walkers needing flexibility to accommodate individual, interpersonal and environmental variability was underpinned by three themes: (a) contrasting drivers for use/non-use of walkers, (b) trade-offs, (c) acceptance of technology within walkers to increase physical activity. Participants were motivated by differing drivers: social for children, emotional for parents and professional for physiotherapists. These contrasting drivers create trade-offs, for example between quality of movement and independence. To maximise physical activity, walker prescribers and designers should prioritise drivers that motivate children and parents, ensuring goal setting is family-centred and participation orientated. Involving families in co-designing walkers is therefore important. Individual clinical assessment allows for identification of children's specific needs and how a child's, parent's and physiotherapist's goals may differ.</p>","PeriodicalId":54388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of children with physical disabilities, parents and physiotherapists on use of walkers and their potential to increase physical activity. A qualitative exploration.\",\"authors\":\"Marilyn Bradbury, Stephanie Tierney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13674935221117868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Children with physical disabilities are less physically active than children with typical development. How children's experiences of using walkers relates to their physical activity has not been studied previously. This study aimed to explore perspectives of walker use and their potential to increase physical activity. Four focus groups were conducted with children aged 7-10 (<i>n</i> = 3; 12.5%), aged 9-12 (<i>n</i> = 4; 16.7%), parents (<i>n</i> = 7; 29.2%) and paediatric physiotherapists (<i>n</i> = 10; 41.7%). Groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using framework analysis. An overarching concept of walkers needing flexibility to accommodate individual, interpersonal and environmental variability was underpinned by three themes: (a) contrasting drivers for use/non-use of walkers, (b) trade-offs, (c) acceptance of technology within walkers to increase physical activity. Participants were motivated by differing drivers: social for children, emotional for parents and professional for physiotherapists. These contrasting drivers create trade-offs, for example between quality of movement and independence. To maximise physical activity, walker prescribers and designers should prioritise drivers that motivate children and parents, ensuring goal setting is family-centred and participation orientated. Involving families in co-designing walkers is therefore important. Individual clinical assessment allows for identification of children's specific needs and how a child's, parent's and physiotherapist's goals may differ.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935221117868\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935221117868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与发育正常的儿童相比,肢体残疾儿童的体育活动较少。儿童使用助行器的经历与他们的体育活动有什么关系,以前还没有研究过。本研究旨在探讨使用助行器的观点及其增加体育活动的潜力。研究人员与 7-10 岁儿童(n=3;12.5%)、9-12 岁儿童(n=4;16.7%)、家长(n=7;29.2%)和儿科物理治疗师(n=10;41.7%)进行了四次焦点小组讨论。对小组讨论进行了录音和转录。数据采用框架分析法进行分析。学步车需要灵活性以适应个人、人际和环境的变化这一总体概念由三个主题支撑:(a) 使用/不使用学步车的不同驱动因素,(b) 权衡利弊,(c) 接受学步车中的技术以增加体力活动。参与者的动机各不相同:对儿童而言是社交动机,对父母而言是情感动机,对物理治疗师而言是专业动机。这些截然不同的驱动力造成了取舍,例如在运动质量和独立性之间的取舍。为了最大限度地提高身体活动量,助行器的处方者和设计者应优先考虑能够激励儿童和家长的驱动因素,确保目标设定以家庭为中心,以参与为导向。因此,让家庭参与到助行器的共同设计中非常重要。通过个人临床评估,可以确定儿童的具体需求,以及儿童、家长和物理治疗师的目标可能有何不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perspectives of children with physical disabilities, parents and physiotherapists on use of walkers and their potential to increase physical activity. A qualitative exploration.

Children with physical disabilities are less physically active than children with typical development. How children's experiences of using walkers relates to their physical activity has not been studied previously. This study aimed to explore perspectives of walker use and their potential to increase physical activity. Four focus groups were conducted with children aged 7-10 (n = 3; 12.5%), aged 9-12 (n = 4; 16.7%), parents (n = 7; 29.2%) and paediatric physiotherapists (n = 10; 41.7%). Groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using framework analysis. An overarching concept of walkers needing flexibility to accommodate individual, interpersonal and environmental variability was underpinned by three themes: (a) contrasting drivers for use/non-use of walkers, (b) trade-offs, (c) acceptance of technology within walkers to increase physical activity. Participants were motivated by differing drivers: social for children, emotional for parents and professional for physiotherapists. These contrasting drivers create trade-offs, for example between quality of movement and independence. To maximise physical activity, walker prescribers and designers should prioritise drivers that motivate children and parents, ensuring goal setting is family-centred and participation orientated. Involving families in co-designing walkers is therefore important. Individual clinical assessment allows for identification of children's specific needs and how a child's, parent's and physiotherapist's goals may differ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Health Care
Journal of Child Health Care NURSING-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child Health Care is a broad ranging, international, professionally-oriented, interdisciplinary and peer reviewed journal. It focuses on issues related to the health and health care of neonates, children, young people and their families, including areas such as illness, disability, complex needs, well-being, quality of life and mental health care in a diverse range of settings. The Journal of Child Health Care publishes original theoretical, empirical and review papers which have application to a wide variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Why are we still doing sucrose trials for newborns? Experiences of siblings and parents of children with congenital heart disease and exploration of siblings' support needs. Mothers' experience seeking healthcare advice for their unsettled infants in Victoria, Australia. Factors that support children and young people to express their views and to have them heard in healthcare: An inductive qualitative content analysis. Goals of Morbidity and Mortality meetings in paediatric acute care. A qualitative case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1