疑似癫痫患者睡眠剥夺脑电图的收益率。回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical EEG and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-27 DOI:10.1177/15500594221142397
Alioth Guerrero-Aranda, Andrea Enríquez-Zaragoza, Karla López-Jiménez, Andrés Antonio González-Garrido
{"title":"疑似癫痫患者睡眠剥夺脑电图的收益率。回顾性研究。","authors":"Alioth Guerrero-Aranda, Andrea Enríquez-Zaragoza, Karla López-Jiménez, Andrés Antonio González-Garrido","doi":"10.1177/15500594221142397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background.</i> Sleep is an activation procedure and is considered the most potent and best-documented modulator of seizures and interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) on electroencephalogram (EEG). The precise role of sleep deprivation in the diagnostic process of epilepsy has not been fully clarified after more than 50 years of use. Sleep deprivation is a procedure that is accompanied by discomfort for patients and their families. Therefore, an accurate indication according to each patient-specific characteristic is needed. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of sleep deprivation EEG in the diagnostic process of patients with suspected epilepsy in our center. <i>Methods.</i> We included patients with a first unprovoked seizure and patients with paroxysmal events suspecting seizures who underwent a sleep deprivation EEG (sdEEG) or routine EEG (rEEG). All patients were subsequently classified with confirmed epilepsy or not. <i>Results.</i> We included 460 patients. The group with sdEEG consisted of 115 patients, while the group with rEEG comprised 345 patients. In the sdEEG group, 19 patients (17%) were confirmed with epilepsy, of which 17 presented interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). For the rEEG group, 66 patients (19%) were confirmed with epilepsy, of which 63 presented IEDs. The difference was not statistically significant. <i>Conclusion.</i> Our study failed to find a difference in the yield of sleep deprivation versus routine EEG in patients with epilepsy, but there are many significant confounders/sample biases that limit the generalizability of the findings, particularly to the majority of adult practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10682,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yield of Sleep Deprivation EEG in Suspected Epilepsy. A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alioth Guerrero-Aranda, Andrea Enríquez-Zaragoza, Karla López-Jiménez, Andrés Antonio González-Garrido\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15500594221142397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background.</i> Sleep is an activation procedure and is considered the most potent and best-documented modulator of seizures and interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) on electroencephalogram (EEG). The precise role of sleep deprivation in the diagnostic process of epilepsy has not been fully clarified after more than 50 years of use. Sleep deprivation is a procedure that is accompanied by discomfort for patients and their families. Therefore, an accurate indication according to each patient-specific characteristic is needed. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of sleep deprivation EEG in the diagnostic process of patients with suspected epilepsy in our center. <i>Methods.</i> We included patients with a first unprovoked seizure and patients with paroxysmal events suspecting seizures who underwent a sleep deprivation EEG (sdEEG) or routine EEG (rEEG). All patients were subsequently classified with confirmed epilepsy or not. <i>Results.</i> We included 460 patients. The group with sdEEG consisted of 115 patients, while the group with rEEG comprised 345 patients. In the sdEEG group, 19 patients (17%) were confirmed with epilepsy, of which 17 presented interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). For the rEEG group, 66 patients (19%) were confirmed with epilepsy, of which 63 presented IEDs. The difference was not statistically significant. <i>Conclusion.</i> Our study failed to find a difference in the yield of sleep deprivation versus routine EEG in patients with epilepsy, but there are many significant confounders/sample biases that limit the generalizability of the findings, particularly to the majority of adult practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221142397\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221142397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。睡眠是一种激活过程,被认为是脑电图(EEG)上癫痫发作和发作间期痫样放电(IEDs)最有效、最有据可查的调节剂。剥夺睡眠在癫痫诊断过程中的确切作用在使用 50 多年后仍未完全明确。剥夺睡眠的过程会给患者及其家属带来不适。因此,需要根据每位患者的具体特征制定准确的适应症。本研究旨在评估睡眠剥夺脑电图在本中心疑似癫痫患者诊断过程中的有效性。研究方法我们纳入了接受睡眠剥夺脑电图(sdEEG)或常规脑电图(rEEG)检查的首次无诱因癫痫发作患者和疑似癫痫发作的阵发性事件患者。所有患者随后都被分类为确诊癫痫或未确诊癫痫。结果我们共纳入了 460 名患者。其中,sdEEG 组有 115 名患者,rEEG 组有 345 名患者。在 sdEEG 组中,19 名患者(17%)被确诊为癫痫,其中 17 人出现发作间期癫痫样放电(IED)。在 rEEG 组中,有 66 名患者(19%)被确诊为癫痫,其中 63 人出现了癫痫间期放电。差异无统计学意义。结论我们的研究未能发现剥夺睡眠与常规脑电图在癫痫患者中的收益率存在差异,但存在许多重大混杂因素/样本偏差,限制了研究结果的推广性,尤其是对大多数成人医疗机构而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Yield of Sleep Deprivation EEG in Suspected Epilepsy. A Retrospective Study.

Background. Sleep is an activation procedure and is considered the most potent and best-documented modulator of seizures and interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) on electroencephalogram (EEG). The precise role of sleep deprivation in the diagnostic process of epilepsy has not been fully clarified after more than 50 years of use. Sleep deprivation is a procedure that is accompanied by discomfort for patients and their families. Therefore, an accurate indication according to each patient-specific characteristic is needed. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of sleep deprivation EEG in the diagnostic process of patients with suspected epilepsy in our center. Methods. We included patients with a first unprovoked seizure and patients with paroxysmal events suspecting seizures who underwent a sleep deprivation EEG (sdEEG) or routine EEG (rEEG). All patients were subsequently classified with confirmed epilepsy or not. Results. We included 460 patients. The group with sdEEG consisted of 115 patients, while the group with rEEG comprised 345 patients. In the sdEEG group, 19 patients (17%) were confirmed with epilepsy, of which 17 presented interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). For the rEEG group, 66 patients (19%) were confirmed with epilepsy, of which 63 presented IEDs. The difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion. Our study failed to find a difference in the yield of sleep deprivation versus routine EEG in patients with epilepsy, but there are many significant confounders/sample biases that limit the generalizability of the findings, particularly to the majority of adult practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical EEG and Neuroscience conveys clinically relevant research and development in electroencephalography and neuroscience. Original articles on any aspect of clinical neurophysiology or related work in allied fields are invited for publication.
期刊最新文献
Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Can Differentiate Treatment-Resistant and Responsive Depression Cases with High Accuracy Deep Brain Stimulator (DBS) Artifact in the EEG of a Pediatric Patient. Classification of BCI Multiclass Motor Imagery Task Based on Artificial Neural Network. Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Alters Auditory Steady-State Oscillatory Rhythms and Their Cross-Frequency Couplings. Comparison of Spectral Analysis of Gamma Band Activity During Actual and Imagined Movements as a Cognitive Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1