剖宫产腰麻术中预防性输注苯肾上腺素与静脉注射昂丹司琼对低血压的影响比较。

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-19 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_48_22
Hani Gharib Ali, Naglaa Abd ELatief
{"title":"剖宫产腰麻术中预防性输注苯肾上腺素与静脉注射昂丹司琼对低血压的影响比较。","authors":"Hani Gharib Ali,&nbsp;Naglaa Abd ELatief","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_48_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple methods have been proposed to prevent the incidence of hypotension in women undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of phenylephrine (50 μg.min<sup>-1</sup>) versus ondansetron (8 mg) in the prevention of such complications.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included a total of 184 full-term pregnant women who were randomly divided into two groups: Group P included 92 cases who were commenced on phenylephrine infusion (50 μg.min<sup>-1</sup> given after puncture) and Group O included the other 92 cases who were administered ondansetron (8 mg given 5 min before puncture).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic data were not significantly different between the two groups. Maternal hypotension was significantly more encountered in the ondansetron group (51.6% vs. 22%) and ephedrine was used more significantly in that group (19.8% vs. 8.8%). In addition, nausea and skin flushing were more commonly encountered in the same group. The incidence of vomiting and patient discomfort was not significantly different between the two study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phenylephrine is markedly superior to ondansetron in the prevention of maternal hypotension and vasopressor need during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 2","pages":"226-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Prophylactic Phenylephrine Infusion Versus Intravenous Ondansetron on Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.\",\"authors\":\"Hani Gharib Ali,&nbsp;Naglaa Abd ELatief\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aer.aer_48_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple methods have been proposed to prevent the incidence of hypotension in women undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of phenylephrine (50 μg.min<sup>-1</sup>) versus ondansetron (8 mg) in the prevention of such complications.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included a total of 184 full-term pregnant women who were randomly divided into two groups: Group P included 92 cases who were commenced on phenylephrine infusion (50 μg.min<sup>-1</sup> given after puncture) and Group O included the other 92 cases who were administered ondansetron (8 mg given 5 min before puncture).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic data were not significantly different between the two groups. Maternal hypotension was significantly more encountered in the ondansetron group (51.6% vs. 22%) and ephedrine was used more significantly in that group (19.8% vs. 8.8%). In addition, nausea and skin flushing were more commonly encountered in the same group. The incidence of vomiting and patient discomfort was not significantly different between the two study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phenylephrine is markedly superior to ondansetron in the prevention of maternal hypotension and vasopressor need during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"226-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_48_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_48_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了预防脊柱麻醉下剖宫产术中低血压的发生,已经提出了多种方法。本研究旨在比较苯肾上腺素(50 μg.min-1)与昂丹司琼(8 mg)预防此类并发症的疗效。患者和方法:184例足月孕妇随机分为两组:P组92例,开始注射苯肾上腺素(50 μg);O组92例给予昂丹司琼(8 mg,穿刺前5 min给予)。结果:两组患者人口学数据差异无统计学意义。昂丹司琼组出现低血压的比例明显高于对照组(51.6%比22%),而麻黄素的使用比例明显高于对照组(19.8%比8.8%)。此外,恶心和皮肤潮红在同一组中更常见。呕吐和患者不适的发生率在两个研究组之间没有显著差异。结论:苯肾上腺素在预防腰麻剖宫产术中产妇低血压及升压需求方面明显优于昂丹司琼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Prophylactic Phenylephrine Infusion Versus Intravenous Ondansetron on Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.

Background: Multiple methods have been proposed to prevent the incidence of hypotension in women undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of phenylephrine (50 μg.min-1) versus ondansetron (8 mg) in the prevention of such complications.

Patients and methods: We included a total of 184 full-term pregnant women who were randomly divided into two groups: Group P included 92 cases who were commenced on phenylephrine infusion (50 μg.min-1 given after puncture) and Group O included the other 92 cases who were administered ondansetron (8 mg given 5 min before puncture).

Results: Demographic data were not significantly different between the two groups. Maternal hypotension was significantly more encountered in the ondansetron group (51.6% vs. 22%) and ephedrine was used more significantly in that group (19.8% vs. 8.8%). In addition, nausea and skin flushing were more commonly encountered in the same group. The incidence of vomiting and patient discomfort was not significantly different between the two study groups.

Conclusion: Phenylephrine is markedly superior to ondansetron in the prevention of maternal hypotension and vasopressor need during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1