尼日利亚中部不同蚊子种类对淋巴丝虫病传播的贡献:对蚊虫池中PCR监测感染的影响

Audrey Lenhart, Abel Eigege, Alphonsus Kal, D Pam, Emmanuel S Miri, George Gerlong, J Oneyka, Y Sambo, J Danboyi, B Ibrahim, Erica Dahl, D Kumbak, A Dakul, My Jinadu, John Umaru, Frank O Richards, Tovi Lehmann
{"title":"尼日利亚中部不同蚊子种类对淋巴丝虫病传播的贡献:对蚊虫池中PCR监测感染的影响","authors":"Audrey Lenhart,&nbsp;Abel Eigege,&nbsp;Alphonsus Kal,&nbsp;D Pam,&nbsp;Emmanuel S Miri,&nbsp;George Gerlong,&nbsp;J Oneyka,&nbsp;Y Sambo,&nbsp;J Danboyi,&nbsp;B Ibrahim,&nbsp;Erica Dahl,&nbsp;D Kumbak,&nbsp;A Dakul,&nbsp;My Jinadu,&nbsp;John Umaru,&nbsp;Frank O Richards,&nbsp;Tovi Lehmann","doi":"10.1186/1475-2883-6-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Members of the Anopheles gambiae complex are important vectors of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in sub-Saharan Africa, but little is known about the relative contributions of all mosquitoes to lymphatic filariasis transmission in this area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 28 month period, mosquitoes were collected from 13 villages in Plateau and Nasarawa states in central Nigeria and dissected to determine W. bancrofti infection status. Wings and legs from a subset of the mosquitoes visually identified as A. gambiae s.l. were identified by PCR as either A. gambiae s.s. or A. arabiensis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A. gambiae s.s peaked in abundance during the rainy season while A. arabiensis predominated during drier parts of the year. Both species were found equally likely to be infected with the developing stages (L1-L3) of W. bancrofti (9.2% and 11.1%, respectively). Fewer A. funestus (1.1%, p < 0.001) were infected than A. gambiae s.l.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the relative contributions of morphologically indistinguishable species to LF transmission is essential if PCR is to be performed on mosquito pools. In the study area, the use of mosquito pools composed of A. gambiae sibling species would not be problematic, as both A. gambiae s.s. and A. arabiensis contribute equally to LF transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":84756,"journal":{"name":"Filaria journal","volume":" ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-6-14","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contributions of different mosquito species to the transmission of lymphatic filariasis in central Nigeria: implications for monitoring infection by PCR in mosquito pools.\",\"authors\":\"Audrey Lenhart,&nbsp;Abel Eigege,&nbsp;Alphonsus Kal,&nbsp;D Pam,&nbsp;Emmanuel S Miri,&nbsp;George Gerlong,&nbsp;J Oneyka,&nbsp;Y Sambo,&nbsp;J Danboyi,&nbsp;B Ibrahim,&nbsp;Erica Dahl,&nbsp;D Kumbak,&nbsp;A Dakul,&nbsp;My Jinadu,&nbsp;John Umaru,&nbsp;Frank O Richards,&nbsp;Tovi Lehmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1475-2883-6-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Members of the Anopheles gambiae complex are important vectors of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in sub-Saharan Africa, but little is known about the relative contributions of all mosquitoes to lymphatic filariasis transmission in this area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 28 month period, mosquitoes were collected from 13 villages in Plateau and Nasarawa states in central Nigeria and dissected to determine W. bancrofti infection status. Wings and legs from a subset of the mosquitoes visually identified as A. gambiae s.l. were identified by PCR as either A. gambiae s.s. or A. arabiensis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A. gambiae s.s peaked in abundance during the rainy season while A. arabiensis predominated during drier parts of the year. Both species were found equally likely to be infected with the developing stages (L1-L3) of W. bancrofti (9.2% and 11.1%, respectively). Fewer A. funestus (1.1%, p < 0.001) were infected than A. gambiae s.l.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the relative contributions of morphologically indistinguishable species to LF transmission is essential if PCR is to be performed on mosquito pools. In the study area, the use of mosquito pools composed of A. gambiae sibling species would not be problematic, as both A. gambiae s.s. and A. arabiensis contribute equally to LF transmission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filaria journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-6-14\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filaria journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-6-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filaria journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-6-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

背景:冈比亚按蚊复合体成员是撒哈拉以南非洲地区淋巴丝虫病(LF)的重要媒介,但对该地区所有蚊子对淋巴丝虫病传播的相对贡献知之甚少。方法:在尼日利亚中部高原州和纳萨拉瓦州的13个村庄收集28个月的蚊虫标本,对其进行解剖分析,确定班氏蜱感染情况。经PCR鉴定为冈比亚按蚊的翅膀和腿分别为冈比亚按蚊和阿拉伯按蚊。结果:冈比亚拟南蝽在雨季数量最多,而阿拉伯拟南蝽在干旱季节数量最多。结果表明,两种植物被班氏白僵菌发育阶段(L1-L3)感染的几率相等(分别为9.2%和11.1%)。结论:若要在蚊池中进行PCR检测,了解形态上难以区分的物种对LF传播的相对贡献是必要的。在研究区,使用冈比亚拟蚊兄弟种组成的蚊池不会有问题,因为冈比亚拟蚊和阿拉伯拟蚊对LF传播的贡献相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contributions of different mosquito species to the transmission of lymphatic filariasis in central Nigeria: implications for monitoring infection by PCR in mosquito pools.

Background: Members of the Anopheles gambiae complex are important vectors of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in sub-Saharan Africa, but little is known about the relative contributions of all mosquitoes to lymphatic filariasis transmission in this area.

Methods: Over a 28 month period, mosquitoes were collected from 13 villages in Plateau and Nasarawa states in central Nigeria and dissected to determine W. bancrofti infection status. Wings and legs from a subset of the mosquitoes visually identified as A. gambiae s.l. were identified by PCR as either A. gambiae s.s. or A. arabiensis.

Results: A. gambiae s.s peaked in abundance during the rainy season while A. arabiensis predominated during drier parts of the year. Both species were found equally likely to be infected with the developing stages (L1-L3) of W. bancrofti (9.2% and 11.1%, respectively). Fewer A. funestus (1.1%, p < 0.001) were infected than A. gambiae s.l.

Conclusion: Understanding the relative contributions of morphologically indistinguishable species to LF transmission is essential if PCR is to be performed on mosquito pools. In the study area, the use of mosquito pools composed of A. gambiae sibling species would not be problematic, as both A. gambiae s.s. and A. arabiensis contribute equally to LF transmission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contribution of migrant coffee labourers infected with Onchocerca volvulus to the maintenance of the microfilarial reservoir in an ivermectin-treated area of Mexico. Epidemiology and psycho-social aspects of onchocercal skin diseases in northeastern Nigeria. Contributions of different mosquito species to the transmission of lymphatic filariasis in central Nigeria: implications for monitoring infection by PCR in mosquito pools. The geographical distribution of lymphatic filariasis infection in Malawi. Monitoring lymphatic filariasis interventions: Adult mosquito sampling, and improved PCR - based pool screening method for Wuchereria bancrofti infection in Anopheles mosquitoes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1