三种平行分布和倒三角分布空心螺钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效比较。

Experimental and therapeutic medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-06 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.3892/etm.2023.12197
Jiuxiang Liu, Qiang Zuo, Hao Zhou, Xiaowen Huang
{"title":"三种平行分布和倒三角分布空心螺钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效比较。","authors":"Jiuxiang Liu,&nbsp;Qiang Zuo,&nbsp;Hao Zhou,&nbsp;Xiaowen Huang","doi":"10.3892/etm.2023.12197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution in comparison with the 'gold standard' of inverting three cannulated screws with triangular distribution, in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A total of 106 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated at the Department of Orthopedics of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Provincial Hospital) from October 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into groups A and B. Group A consisted of 51 patients with a mean age of 73.3±6.8 years; and group B consisted of 55 patients with a mean age of 74.5±7.3 years. Group A was treated with closed reduction + inverted triangular distribution of three cannulated screws, while group B was treated with closed reduction + parallel distribution of three cannulated screws, and the general surgical conditions, including fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and functional recovery scale (FRS) score of hip joint function were assessed in both groups. All patients were followed up for an average of 14.8 months. Compared with group A, group B had significant advantages in operation time, number of times intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed, number of intraoperative guide wire adjustments, and proportion of postoperative referrals to the intensive care unit (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and FRS score of hip joint function between groups A and B (P>0.05). For elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, distributing three cannulated screws in parallel after closed reduction achieved similar clinical efficacy to 'gold standard' inverted triangular distribution, and had obvious advantages in operation time, with significantly reduced surgical difficulty. This procedure is therefore deemed worthy of promotion and clinical application in the primary hospitals of China.</p>","PeriodicalId":94002,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and therapeutic medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518655/pdf/etm-26-04-12197.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution and inverted triangular distribution in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.\",\"authors\":\"Jiuxiang Liu,&nbsp;Qiang Zuo,&nbsp;Hao Zhou,&nbsp;Xiaowen Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.3892/etm.2023.12197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution in comparison with the 'gold standard' of inverting three cannulated screws with triangular distribution, in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A total of 106 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated at the Department of Orthopedics of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Provincial Hospital) from October 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into groups A and B. Group A consisted of 51 patients with a mean age of 73.3±6.8 years; and group B consisted of 55 patients with a mean age of 74.5±7.3 years. Group A was treated with closed reduction + inverted triangular distribution of three cannulated screws, while group B was treated with closed reduction + parallel distribution of three cannulated screws, and the general surgical conditions, including fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and functional recovery scale (FRS) score of hip joint function were assessed in both groups. All patients were followed up for an average of 14.8 months. Compared with group A, group B had significant advantages in operation time, number of times intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed, number of intraoperative guide wire adjustments, and proportion of postoperative referrals to the intensive care unit (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and FRS score of hip joint function between groups A and B (P>0.05). For elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, distributing three cannulated screws in parallel after closed reduction achieved similar clinical efficacy to 'gold standard' inverted triangular distribution, and had obvious advantages in operation time, with significantly reduced surgical difficulty. This procedure is therefore deemed worthy of promotion and clinical application in the primary hospitals of China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and therapeutic medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518655/pdf/etm-26-04-12197.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and therapeutic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and therapeutic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究三个平行分布的空心螺钉与倒置三个三角形分布的空心螺丝的“金标准”在治疗老年股骨颈骨折中的临床疗效。对2018年10月至2020年3月在南京医科大学附属第一医院(江苏省立医院)骨科接受治疗的106例老年股骨颈骨折患者进行回顾性分析,分为A组和B组。A组51例,平均年龄73.3±6.8岁;B组55例,平均年龄74.5±7.3岁。A组采用闭合复位+三枚空心螺钉倒三角分布治疗,B组采用闭合减压+三枚平行分布空心螺钉治疗,一般手术条件包括骨折复位质量、骨折愈合、股骨头缺血性坏死发生率,并评估两组髋关节功能恢复量表(FRS)评分。所有患者平均随访14.8个月。与A组相比,B组在手术时间、术中荧光镜检查次数、术中导丝调整次数、术后转诊至重症监护室的比例等方面具有显著优势(P0.05),闭合复位后平行分布三枚空心螺钉,临床疗效与金标准倒三角分布相似,手术时间优势明显,手术难度显著降低。该方法值得在我国基层医院推广应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution and inverted triangular distribution in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution in comparison with the 'gold standard' of inverting three cannulated screws with triangular distribution, in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A total of 106 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated at the Department of Orthopedics of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Provincial Hospital) from October 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into groups A and B. Group A consisted of 51 patients with a mean age of 73.3±6.8 years; and group B consisted of 55 patients with a mean age of 74.5±7.3 years. Group A was treated with closed reduction + inverted triangular distribution of three cannulated screws, while group B was treated with closed reduction + parallel distribution of three cannulated screws, and the general surgical conditions, including fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and functional recovery scale (FRS) score of hip joint function were assessed in both groups. All patients were followed up for an average of 14.8 months. Compared with group A, group B had significant advantages in operation time, number of times intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed, number of intraoperative guide wire adjustments, and proportion of postoperative referrals to the intensive care unit (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and FRS score of hip joint function between groups A and B (P>0.05). For elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, distributing three cannulated screws in parallel after closed reduction achieved similar clinical efficacy to 'gold standard' inverted triangular distribution, and had obvious advantages in operation time, with significantly reduced surgical difficulty. This procedure is therefore deemed worthy of promotion and clinical application in the primary hospitals of China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Retracted] Matrix metalloproteinase 14 participates in corneal lymphangiogenesis through the VEGF‑C/VEGFR‑3 signaling pathway. Renal venous hemangioma: Report of a rare case. Refining synovial inflammation assessment: A modified General Synovitis Score for active rheumatoid arthritis. First insight into eosinophils as a biomarker for the early distinction of COVID-19 from influenza A in outpatients. Innovative therapeutic strategies for intrauterine adhesions: Role of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in rat models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1