父母游戏障碍量表:土耳其语表的信度和有效性研究。

Seher Ş Palanbek Yava, Caner Baysan, Leyla Baysan Arabaci
{"title":"父母游戏障碍量表:土耳其语表的信度和有效性研究。","authors":"Seher Ş Palanbek Yava, Caner Baysan, Leyla Baysan Arabaci","doi":"10.5080/u27320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to conduct the validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents (GADIS-P).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this methodological study, the study sample consisted of 345 parents who had children within the age range of 10-17 years who played digital games. The study data were collected through the Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents, the Scale for Determining Parents' Perceptions of Computer Game Addiction, and the Digital Parenting Attitude Scale. The Cronbach's alpha analysis for reliability, item total correlation analysis, confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis for construct validity, and clustering analysis for identifying gaming disorder according to the scale scores were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was determined that the content validity index of the scale was 0.97, that item loads varied between 0.617 and 0.863 according to exploratory factor analysis, and that the scale had good fit indices in the confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach's reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be α=0.907, and the item total correlations were determined to be adequate. The criterion validity analysis found a positive and strong correlation with the Scale for Identifying Parents' Perceptions Regarding Digital Game Addiction (r=0.717 p0.001). As a result of the clustering analysis, it was determined that the cut-off value was found as >9 points for \"Cognitive Behavioral Symptoms\" subscale and as >6 points for \"Negative Consequences\" subscale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results obtained show that the Turkish version of the Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents is a valid and reliable measurement tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":94262,"journal":{"name":"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents: Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Form.\",\"authors\":\"Seher Ş Palanbek Yava, Caner Baysan, Leyla Baysan Arabaci\",\"doi\":\"10.5080/u27320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to conduct the validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents (GADIS-P).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this methodological study, the study sample consisted of 345 parents who had children within the age range of 10-17 years who played digital games. The study data were collected through the Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents, the Scale for Determining Parents' Perceptions of Computer Game Addiction, and the Digital Parenting Attitude Scale. The Cronbach's alpha analysis for reliability, item total correlation analysis, confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis for construct validity, and clustering analysis for identifying gaming disorder according to the scale scores were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was determined that the content validity index of the scale was 0.97, that item loads varied between 0.617 and 0.863 according to exploratory factor analysis, and that the scale had good fit indices in the confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach's reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be α=0.907, and the item total correlations were determined to be adequate. The criterion validity analysis found a positive and strong correlation with the Scale for Identifying Parents' Perceptions Regarding Digital Game Addiction (r=0.717 p0.001). As a result of the clustering analysis, it was determined that the cut-off value was found as >9 points for \\\"Cognitive Behavioral Symptoms\\\" subscale and as >6 points for \\\"Negative Consequences\\\" subscale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results obtained show that the Turkish version of the Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents is a valid and reliable measurement tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645017/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5080/u27320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5080/u27320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在对土耳其版父母游戏障碍量表(GADIS-P)进行有效性和可靠性研究。研究数据通过父母游戏障碍量表、确定父母对电脑游戏成瘾的感知量表和数字育儿态度量表收集。使用了信度的Cronbachα分析、项目总相关分析、结构有效性的验证性和探索性因素分析,以及根据量表得分识别游戏障碍的聚类分析。结果:探索性因素分析表明,该量表的内容有效性指数为0.97,项目负荷在0.617-0.863之间,验证性因素分析显示该量表具有良好的拟合指数。量表的Cronbach可靠性系数为α=0.907,项目总相关性被确定为足够。标准有效性分析发现,与父母对数字游戏成瘾的认知量表呈正相关(r=0.717 p0.001)。聚类分析结果表明,“认知行为症状”分量表的截止值>9分,“负面后果”分量表为>6分。结论:土耳其语版家长游戏障碍量表是一种有效、可靠的测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents: Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Form.

Objective: This study aimed to conduct the validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents (GADIS-P).

Methods: In this methodological study, the study sample consisted of 345 parents who had children within the age range of 10-17 years who played digital games. The study data were collected through the Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents, the Scale for Determining Parents' Perceptions of Computer Game Addiction, and the Digital Parenting Attitude Scale. The Cronbach's alpha analysis for reliability, item total correlation analysis, confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis for construct validity, and clustering analysis for identifying gaming disorder according to the scale scores were used.

Results: It was determined that the content validity index of the scale was 0.97, that item loads varied between 0.617 and 0.863 according to exploratory factor analysis, and that the scale had good fit indices in the confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach's reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be α=0.907, and the item total correlations were determined to be adequate. The criterion validity analysis found a positive and strong correlation with the Scale for Identifying Parents' Perceptions Regarding Digital Game Addiction (r=0.717 p0.001). As a result of the clustering analysis, it was determined that the cut-off value was found as >9 points for "Cognitive Behavioral Symptoms" subscale and as >6 points for "Negative Consequences" subscale.

Conclusion: The results obtained show that the Turkish version of the Gaming Disorder Scale for Parents is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Artificial Intelligence hallucinating? Is Artificial Intelligence hallucinating? The use of Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy: Practical and Ethical Aspects. And What About Secondary Catatonia? Ukraine, Crisis and Mental Health Resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1