在干预反应模型的背景下检测年长小学生的西班牙语阅读困难。

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Dyslexia Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1002/dys.1755
José M. Ramos-Carrillo, Francisco J. Moreno-Perez
{"title":"在干预反应模型的背景下检测年长小学生的西班牙语阅读困难。","authors":"José M. Ramos-Carrillo,&nbsp;Francisco J. Moreno-Perez","doi":"10.1002/dys.1755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Detecting students with reading difficulties (RD) is particularly important in the context of the Response to Intervention (RTI) model, in terms of both research and professional practice. However, there is no unanimous agreement on the best procedure to carry it out. In addition, most of the research in this field has been carried out in the English language, and there is little evidence on how these measures behave in other languages. This study focuses on identifying the best procedure for detecting RD in Spanish in older elementary students, comparing the validity, accuracy and goodness of fit of three different universal screening assessment approaches—the Psychometric Assessment Approach, the Curriculum-Based Assessment Approach and the Teacher Detection Approach—using RTI as a criterion to determine the goodness of fit of the different approaches. A total of 154 fifth-year primary students participated in this study. The results reveal that the multivariate inclusion of the evaluation approaches used is the best means of ensuring an efficient, valid assessment when attempting to identify RD among fifth graders. This finding has practical implications for the implementation of the RTI model in the field of RD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1755","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting reading difficulties in Spanish in older elementary students in the context of the Response to Intervention model\",\"authors\":\"José M. Ramos-Carrillo,&nbsp;Francisco J. Moreno-Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dys.1755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Detecting students with reading difficulties (RD) is particularly important in the context of the Response to Intervention (RTI) model, in terms of both research and professional practice. However, there is no unanimous agreement on the best procedure to carry it out. In addition, most of the research in this field has been carried out in the English language, and there is little evidence on how these measures behave in other languages. This study focuses on identifying the best procedure for detecting RD in Spanish in older elementary students, comparing the validity, accuracy and goodness of fit of three different universal screening assessment approaches—the Psychometric Assessment Approach, the Curriculum-Based Assessment Approach and the Teacher Detection Approach—using RTI as a criterion to determine the goodness of fit of the different approaches. A total of 154 fifth-year primary students participated in this study. The results reveal that the multivariate inclusion of the evaluation approaches used is the best means of ensuring an efficient, valid assessment when attempting to identify RD among fifth graders. This finding has practical implications for the implementation of the RTI model in the field of RD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dyslexia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1755\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.1755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.1755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从研究和专业实践的角度来看,在干预反应(RTI)模型的背景下,检测有阅读困难(RD)的学生尤为重要。然而,对于执行这项工作的最佳程序,并没有达成一致意见。此外,该领域的大多数研究都是在英语中进行的,很少有证据表明这些措施在其他语言中的表现。本研究的重点是确定在年龄较大的小学生中检测西班牙语RD的最佳程序,比较三种不同的通用筛查评估方法(心理测量评估方法)的有效性、准确性和拟合优度,基于课程的评估方法和使用RTI作为标准来确定不同方法的拟合优度的教师检测方法。共有154名五年级小学生参与了这项研究。结果表明,在试图识别五年级学生的RD时,所使用的评估方法的多元纳入是确保有效评估的最佳手段。这一发现对RTI模型在RD领域的实施具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detecting reading difficulties in Spanish in older elementary students in the context of the Response to Intervention model

Detecting students with reading difficulties (RD) is particularly important in the context of the Response to Intervention (RTI) model, in terms of both research and professional practice. However, there is no unanimous agreement on the best procedure to carry it out. In addition, most of the research in this field has been carried out in the English language, and there is little evidence on how these measures behave in other languages. This study focuses on identifying the best procedure for detecting RD in Spanish in older elementary students, comparing the validity, accuracy and goodness of fit of three different universal screening assessment approaches—the Psychometric Assessment Approach, the Curriculum-Based Assessment Approach and the Teacher Detection Approach—using RTI as a criterion to determine the goodness of fit of the different approaches. A total of 154 fifth-year primary students participated in this study. The results reveal that the multivariate inclusion of the evaluation approaches used is the best means of ensuring an efficient, valid assessment when attempting to identify RD among fifth graders. This finding has practical implications for the implementation of the RTI model in the field of RD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dyslexia
Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: DYSLEXIA provides reviews and reports of research, assessment and intervention practice. In many fields of enquiry theoretical advances often occur in response to practical needs; and a central aim of the journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners in the field of dyslexia, so that each can learn from the other. Interesting developments, both theoretical and practical, are being reported in many different countries: DYSLEXIA is a forum in which a knowledge of these developments can be shared by readers in all parts of the world. The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education Therapy and Counselling Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of: - Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology - Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education - Therapy and Counselling - Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine
期刊最新文献
Presentation matters: Surface text features and text quality in written narratives of Dutch high school students with and without dyslexia Subjective visual vertical/horizontal and video head impulse test in dyslexic children Correction to effects of a visual perception-based occupational therapy programme on reading and motor skills in children with developmental dyslexia: Single blind randomised crossover study design Improving persuasive writing skills of high school students with specific learning disabilities: STOP and DARE strategy The perceptual span in dyslexic reading and visual search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1