Scrotal Wall Metastasis from Adenocarcinoma of Unknown Origin, with Concurrent Extramammary Paget's Disease - a Case Report.

Introduction: Scrotal cancer is a very rare disease, with the most common subtype being squamous cell carcinoma. Metastatic carcinoma to the scrotal wall is very rare. A histological finding of adenocarcinoma in a scrotal malignancy invariably suggests a metastasis from another primary cancer. We describe an enigmatic case of metastatic adenocarcinoma to the scrotum managed as metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown origin. Attempts to identify a primary cancer were complicated by ambiguous diagnostic results. This is the first case in literature of metastatic cancer to the scrotum from an adenocarcinoma of unknown origin, and this was complicated by concurrent extramammary Paget's disease.

Case presentation: A 70-year-old male presented with painless progressive scrotal skin swelling, which was shown on histology to be adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry showed prostatic lineage markers. However, the argument for a prostatic primary was weakened by negative prostate transrectal ultrasound biopsy findings and negative radiological findings. The scrotal metastatic adenocarcinoma was managed as metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown origin. A differential of occult poorly differentiated prostatic primary was considered in view of the clinical phenotype of an elderly male patient with extensive sclerotic bony metastases, immunohistochemistry results and relatively low PSA level in relation to systemic burden of disease. The patient was managed with palliative systemic chemotherapy (carboplatin/paclitaxel) with initial disease response, but eventually developed progressive disease.

Discussion and conclusion: Finding of adenocarcinoma in scrotal skin malignancy indicates a metastasis and should prompt further work-up to identify a primary cancer, particularly of other genitourinary or lower gastrointestinal origin, so that treatment can be targeted at the underlying primary malignancy. However, attempts to identify a primary cancer might be complicated by ambiguous diagnostic results.