先发制人与不先发制人的肾移植有什么好处?系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Reviews Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.trre.2023.100798
Reshma Rana Magar , Simon R. Knight , Umberto Maggiore , Jeffrey A. Lafranca , Frank J.M.F. Dor , Liset H.M. Pengel
{"title":"先发制人与不先发制人的肾移植有什么好处?系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Reshma Rana Magar ,&nbsp;Simon R. Knight ,&nbsp;Umberto Maggiore ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Lafranca ,&nbsp;Frank J.M.F. Dor ,&nbsp;Liset H.M. Pengel","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2023.100798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Opting for a preemptive kidney transplant (PKT) can help avoid costs and morbidity associated with dialysis. However, while multiple studies have shown clinical benefits of PKT, other studies have not demonstrated this, leading to controversy in the literature regarding the exact benefits of PKT. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of PKT versus non-preemptive kidney transplantation (nPKT) in adult patients. Multiple databases were searched up to May 4, 2022. Independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion and extracted relevant data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Eighty-seven studies including 859,715 adult kidney transplant patients were included the review. The risk of patient death (relative risk [95% confidence interval] 0.74 [0.60–0.91]) was significantly lower in PKT versus nPKT patients for living donor (LD) transplants, whereas the risk of overall graft loss was significantly lower in PKT compared to nPKT patients for both LD (0.72 [0.62–0.83]) as well as deceased donor (DD) transplants (0.80 [0.69–0.92]). The evidence suggests that LD PKT patients have a lower risk of patient death and graft loss compared to nPKT patients, and DD PKT patients have a lower risk of graft loss than nPKT patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"37 4","pages":"Article 100798"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the benefits of preemptive versus non-preemptive kidney transplantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Reshma Rana Magar ,&nbsp;Simon R. Knight ,&nbsp;Umberto Maggiore ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Lafranca ,&nbsp;Frank J.M.F. Dor ,&nbsp;Liset H.M. Pengel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trre.2023.100798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Opting for a preemptive kidney transplant (PKT) can help avoid costs and morbidity associated with dialysis. However, while multiple studies have shown clinical benefits of PKT, other studies have not demonstrated this, leading to controversy in the literature regarding the exact benefits of PKT. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of PKT versus non-preemptive kidney transplantation (nPKT) in adult patients. Multiple databases were searched up to May 4, 2022. Independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion and extracted relevant data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Eighty-seven studies including 859,715 adult kidney transplant patients were included the review. The risk of patient death (relative risk [95% confidence interval] 0.74 [0.60–0.91]) was significantly lower in PKT versus nPKT patients for living donor (LD) transplants, whereas the risk of overall graft loss was significantly lower in PKT compared to nPKT patients for both LD (0.72 [0.62–0.83]) as well as deceased donor (DD) transplants (0.80 [0.69–0.92]). The evidence suggests that LD PKT patients have a lower risk of patient death and graft loss compared to nPKT patients, and DD PKT patients have a lower risk of graft loss than nPKT patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X23000526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X23000526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择优先肾移植(PKT)有助于避免与透析相关的费用和发病率。然而,尽管多项研究显示了PKT的临床益处,但其他研究并未证明这一点,这在文献中引发了关于PKT确切益处的争议。因此,本研究旨在确定成年患者PKT与非优先肾移植(nPKT)的临床结果。截至2022年5月4日,搜索了多个数据库。独立评审员选择纳入研究并提取相关数据。使用Downs和Black检查表评估偏倚风险。87项研究包括859715名成年肾移植患者。对于活体供体(LD)移植,PKT患者的患者死亡风险(相对风险[95%置信区间]0.74[0.60-0.91])显著低于nPKT患者,而与nPKT患者相比,在LD(0.72[0.62-0.83])和已故供体(DD)移植(0.80[0.69-0.92])中,PKT患者的整体移植物损失风险显著降低。证据表明,与nPKT患者相比,LD PKT患者死亡和移植物损失的风险较低,并且DD PKT患者移植物损失损失的风险低于nPKT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What are the benefits of preemptive versus non-preemptive kidney transplantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Opting for a preemptive kidney transplant (PKT) can help avoid costs and morbidity associated with dialysis. However, while multiple studies have shown clinical benefits of PKT, other studies have not demonstrated this, leading to controversy in the literature regarding the exact benefits of PKT. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of PKT versus non-preemptive kidney transplantation (nPKT) in adult patients. Multiple databases were searched up to May 4, 2022. Independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion and extracted relevant data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Eighty-seven studies including 859,715 adult kidney transplant patients were included the review. The risk of patient death (relative risk [95% confidence interval] 0.74 [0.60–0.91]) was significantly lower in PKT versus nPKT patients for living donor (LD) transplants, whereas the risk of overall graft loss was significantly lower in PKT compared to nPKT patients for both LD (0.72 [0.62–0.83]) as well as deceased donor (DD) transplants (0.80 [0.69–0.92]). The evidence suggests that LD PKT patients have a lower risk of patient death and graft loss compared to nPKT patients, and DD PKT patients have a lower risk of graft loss than nPKT patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Early and late antibody mediated rejection: Which game is the complement playing? Heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart diseases: A comprehensive meta-analysis on waiting times, operative, and survival outcomes Complement and complement regulatory protein in allogeneic and xenogeneic kidney transplantation Frailty serves as an adverse predictor for mortality in liver transplant candidates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1