颈动脉血流动力学对颈动脉斑块位置的影响:年龄差异。

Neuro endocrinology letters Pub Date : 2023-09-29
Xia Ren, Fan Su, Jian Hu, Lei Cao, Yumei Zhou, Yuhan Fu, Grace Tavengana, Mingfei Jiang, Huan Wu, Yufeng Wen
{"title":"颈动脉血流动力学对颈动脉斑块位置的影响:年龄差异。","authors":"Xia Ren, Fan Su, Jian Hu, Lei Cao, Yumei Zhou, Yuhan Fu, Grace Tavengana, Mingfei Jiang, Huan Wu, Yufeng Wen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was aimed to investigate the influence of carotid hemodynamics in common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) on carotid plaque location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4444 participants from Anhui Maanshan People's Hospital were selected from December 2013 to December 2018. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure the location of carotid plaque. Patients were divided into four groups according to plaque location: LEFT, RIGHT, BOTH, and NONE. Multiple logistic regression and smooth curve were applied to determine the relationship of carotid plaque location and hemodynamic indexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the NONE group, the ratio of artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity in right internal carotid (RICA S/D) was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.548) after adjustment; artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of left common carotid artery (LCCA S/D) was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.250); resistance index of right internal carotid (RICA RI) was a protective factor for BOTH group (OR=0.097), while LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.201, OR=1.457). Compared with the RIGHT group, artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of right common carotid (RCCA S/D) was the risk factor for the LEFT group (OR=1.463), LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were the risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.706, OR=2.111). After age stratification, resistance index of right common carotid artery (RCCA RI) and resistance index of left internal carotid artery (LICA RI) were protective factors for BOTH group (OR=0.046, OR=0.042) in group younger than 52. RCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.557, OR=1.843). Resistance index of left common carotid artery (LCCA RI) was a protective factor in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.476). In group older than 52, RICA S/D was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.388). LCCA S/D was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.575). LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.348, OR=1.311). RICA S/D and RCCA S/D were protective factors in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.567, OR=0.680).</p>","PeriodicalId":94154,"journal":{"name":"Neuro endocrinology letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of carotid hemodynamics on carotid plaque location: Age difference.\",\"authors\":\"Xia Ren, Fan Su, Jian Hu, Lei Cao, Yumei Zhou, Yuhan Fu, Grace Tavengana, Mingfei Jiang, Huan Wu, Yufeng Wen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was aimed to investigate the influence of carotid hemodynamics in common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) on carotid plaque location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4444 participants from Anhui Maanshan People's Hospital were selected from December 2013 to December 2018. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure the location of carotid plaque. Patients were divided into four groups according to plaque location: LEFT, RIGHT, BOTH, and NONE. Multiple logistic regression and smooth curve were applied to determine the relationship of carotid plaque location and hemodynamic indexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the NONE group, the ratio of artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity in right internal carotid (RICA S/D) was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.548) after adjustment; artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of left common carotid artery (LCCA S/D) was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.250); resistance index of right internal carotid (RICA RI) was a protective factor for BOTH group (OR=0.097), while LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.201, OR=1.457). Compared with the RIGHT group, artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of right common carotid (RCCA S/D) was the risk factor for the LEFT group (OR=1.463), LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were the risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.706, OR=2.111). After age stratification, resistance index of right common carotid artery (RCCA RI) and resistance index of left internal carotid artery (LICA RI) were protective factors for BOTH group (OR=0.046, OR=0.042) in group younger than 52. RCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.557, OR=1.843). Resistance index of left common carotid artery (LCCA RI) was a protective factor in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.476). In group older than 52, RICA S/D was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.388). LCCA S/D was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.575). LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.348, OR=1.311). RICA S/D and RCCA S/D were protective factors in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.567, OR=0.680).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro endocrinology letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究颈总动脉(CCA)和颈内动脉(ICA)的颈动脉血流动力学对颈动脉斑块位置的影响。方法:2013年12月至2018年12月,共有4444名参与者来自安徽省马鞍山市人民医院。应用多普勒超声测量颈动脉斑块的位置。根据斑块位置将患者分为四组:左侧、右侧、两侧和无。采用多元逻辑回归和平滑曲线分析颈动脉斑块位置与血流动力学指标的关系。结果:与NONE组相比,调整后的右颈内动脉收缩和舒张血流速度之比(RICA S/D)是LEFT组的危险因素(OR=1.548);左颈总动脉收缩和舒张血流速度比(LCCA S/D)是RIGHT组的危险因素(OR=1.250);右颈内动脉阻力指数(RICA RI)是BOTH组的保护因素(OR=0.097),LCCA S/D和RICA S/D是BOTH的危险因素(OR=1.201,OR=1.457),LCCA S/D和RICA S/D是BOTH组的危险因素(OR=1.706,OR=2.111)。年龄分层后,52岁以下组的右颈内动脉阻力指数(RCCA RI)和左颈内动脉阻力指标(LICA RI)对BOTH组具有保护作用(OR=0.046,OR=0.042)。RCCA S/D和RICA S/D是两组的危险因素(OR=1.557、OR=1.843)。左颈总动脉阻力指数(LCCA RI)是left组和RIGHT组的保护因素(OR=0.476),RICA S/D是LEFT组的危险因素(OR=1.388)。LCCA S/D是RIGHT组的危险因子(OR=1.575。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of carotid hemodynamics on carotid plaque location: Age difference.

Purpose: This study was aimed to investigate the influence of carotid hemodynamics in common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) on carotid plaque location.

Methods: A total of 4444 participants from Anhui Maanshan People's Hospital were selected from December 2013 to December 2018. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure the location of carotid plaque. Patients were divided into four groups according to plaque location: LEFT, RIGHT, BOTH, and NONE. Multiple logistic regression and smooth curve were applied to determine the relationship of carotid plaque location and hemodynamic indexes.

Results: Compared with the NONE group, the ratio of artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity in right internal carotid (RICA S/D) was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.548) after adjustment; artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of left common carotid artery (LCCA S/D) was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.250); resistance index of right internal carotid (RICA RI) was a protective factor for BOTH group (OR=0.097), while LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.201, OR=1.457). Compared with the RIGHT group, artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of right common carotid (RCCA S/D) was the risk factor for the LEFT group (OR=1.463), LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were the risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.706, OR=2.111). After age stratification, resistance index of right common carotid artery (RCCA RI) and resistance index of left internal carotid artery (LICA RI) were protective factors for BOTH group (OR=0.046, OR=0.042) in group younger than 52. RCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.557, OR=1.843). Resistance index of left common carotid artery (LCCA RI) was a protective factor in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.476). In group older than 52, RICA S/D was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.388). LCCA S/D was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.575). LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.348, OR=1.311). RICA S/D and RCCA S/D were protective factors in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.567, OR=0.680).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building skills in cognitive behavioral supervision. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Solution Combining Convolutional Neural Network and Analytical Approach Showed Higher Accuracy in A-lines Detection on Lung Ultrasound in Thoracic Surgery Patients Compared with Radiology Resident. Impact of an over-the-counter "sleep lotion" on human salivary melatonin levels and sleep quality: a randomized controlled trial. New approach and strategy in the assessment of labour pain - Czech version of the labour coping pain assessment tool. Protective effects and mechanisms of deer blood phospholipids (DBP) on zearalenone-induced oxidative damage in swine Sertoli cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1