可摘局部义齿对部分性失足患者咀嚼性能的影响:一项系统综述。

Navodika Yaparathna, Ruvini Manjula Hettiarachchi, Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla, Robert Love, Nigel D Robb, Menaka Abuzar
{"title":"可摘局部义齿对部分性失足患者咀嚼性能的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Navodika Yaparathna, Ruvini Manjula Hettiarachchi, Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla, Robert Love, Nigel D Robb, Menaka Abuzar","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of removable partial dentures (RPDs) on masticatory performance (MP) of partially edentulous subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Electronic database and hand searches were conducted to explore clinical trials reporting the evidence of the effect of metal- and acrylic-based RPDs on mastication. The validated objective and subjective measures of assessment of mastication were included. The article selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias were conducted by two reviewers independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 11,200 studies, 1 randomized controlled trial and 23 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Positive impact on different parameters of masticatory function after RPD treatment was reported in 14 studies. Subjective evaluation of chewing ability (CA) displayed an improvement in 83.3% of studies, while improvement was evidenced only in 69.5% of studies upon objective evaluation. Most studies reported data on free-end saddles. Of the 13 studies associated with bilateral free-end saddle dentures, 9 studies showed a positive effect on masticatory efficiency. Various factors were found to have an impact on the MP of RPDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subjective evaluation displays higher positive impact of RPDs in MP than objective evaluation. Assessment of patients' perspectives is important in clinical decision-making. Multiple factors affect the MP with RPD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"327-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Removable Partial Dentures on Masticatory Performance in Partial Edentulism: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Navodika Yaparathna, Ruvini Manjula Hettiarachchi, Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla, Robert Love, Nigel D Robb, Menaka Abuzar\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of removable partial dentures (RPDs) on masticatory performance (MP) of partially edentulous subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Electronic database and hand searches were conducted to explore clinical trials reporting the evidence of the effect of metal- and acrylic-based RPDs on mastication. The validated objective and subjective measures of assessment of mastication were included. The article selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias were conducted by two reviewers independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 11,200 studies, 1 randomized controlled trial and 23 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Positive impact on different parameters of masticatory function after RPD treatment was reported in 14 studies. Subjective evaluation of chewing ability (CA) displayed an improvement in 83.3% of studies, while improvement was evidenced only in 69.5% of studies upon objective evaluation. Most studies reported data on free-end saddles. Of the 13 studies associated with bilateral free-end saddle dentures, 9 studies showed a positive effect on masticatory efficiency. Various factors were found to have an impact on the MP of RPDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subjective evaluation displays higher positive impact of RPDs in MP than objective evaluation. Assessment of patients' perspectives is important in clinical decision-making. Multiple factors affect the MP with RPD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"327-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:可摘局部义齿(RPD)作为一种经济高效的口腔功能恢复治疗方法,在临床牙科实践中得到了广泛应用。清楚地了解局部义齿对咀嚼性能的影响对于口腔修复的临床决策非常重要。本系统综述的目的是评估RPD对部分缺牙受试者咀嚼性能(MP)的影响。材料和方法:进行电子数据库和手部搜索,以探索报告金属和丙烯酸基可摘局部义齿对咀嚼效果影响的证据的临床试验。包括经验证的咀嚼评估的客观和主观测量。文章选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估由两名评审员独立进行。结果:在11200项研究中,一项随机对照试验和23项临床试验符合纳入标准。14项研究报告了RPD治疗后对不同咀嚼功能参数的积极影响。83.3%的研究显示咀嚼能力(CA)的主观评估有所改善,而在客观评估的研究中,只有69.5%的研究证明咀嚼能力有所改善。大多数研究报告了自由端鞍座的数据。在13项与双侧游离端鞍状义齿相关的研究中,有9项研究显示出对咀嚼效率的积极影响。研究发现,各种因素对RPD的咀嚼性能(MP)有影响。结论主观评价显示RPD对MP的积极影响高于客观评价。评估患者的观点在临床决策中很重要。多种因素影响RPD治疗的MP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Removable Partial Dentures on Masticatory Performance in Partial Edentulism: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of removable partial dentures (RPDs) on masticatory performance (MP) of partially edentulous subjects.

Materials and methods: Electronic database and hand searches were conducted to explore clinical trials reporting the evidence of the effect of metal- and acrylic-based RPDs on mastication. The validated objective and subjective measures of assessment of mastication were included. The article selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias were conducted by two reviewers independently.

Results: Out of 11,200 studies, 1 randomized controlled trial and 23 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Positive impact on different parameters of masticatory function after RPD treatment was reported in 14 studies. Subjective evaluation of chewing ability (CA) displayed an improvement in 83.3% of studies, while improvement was evidenced only in 69.5% of studies upon objective evaluation. Most studies reported data on free-end saddles. Of the 13 studies associated with bilateral free-end saddle dentures, 9 studies showed a positive effect on masticatory efficiency. Various factors were found to have an impact on the MP of RPDs.

Conclusions: Subjective evaluation displays higher positive impact of RPDs in MP than objective evaluation. Assessment of patients' perspectives is important in clinical decision-making. Multiple factors affect the MP with RPD treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Food-Simulating Liquids on Hydrolytic Behavior of Resin Matrix Ceramics. A Pilot Study to Predict Lifetime of Resin-Based Materials for Denture: Presentation of an In Vitro Thermally-Accelerated Ageing Method. In Vitro Comparison of Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion in Composite Resin-Based Materials for Additive, Subtractive, and Conventional Manufacturing. Reference CAD-CAM Samples for Dental Shade Communication for Successful Aesthetic Outcome. An Investigation of Stress Distribution Between Two Different Implant Concept in Implant-Supported Maxillary Prostheses with Different Framework Materials: A Finite Element Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1