白内障超声乳化白内障摘除术中使用和不使用Kahook双刀片角切开术的青光眼患者的屈光结果。

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye and Vision Pub Date : 2019-09-19 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40662-019-0153-2
Erin G Sieck, Cara E Capitena Young, Rebecca S Epstein, Jeffrey R SooHoo, Mina B Pantcheva, Jennifer L Patnaik, Anne M Lynch, Malik Y Kahook, Leonard K Seibold
{"title":"白内障超声乳化白内障摘除术中使用和不使用Kahook双刀片角切开术的青光眼患者的屈光结果。","authors":"Erin G Sieck,&nbsp;Cara E Capitena Young,&nbsp;Rebecca S Epstein,&nbsp;Jeffrey R SooHoo,&nbsp;Mina B Pantcheva,&nbsp;Jennifer L Patnaik,&nbsp;Anne M Lynch,&nbsp;Malik Y Kahook,&nbsp;Leonard K Seibold","doi":"10.1186/s40662-019-0153-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glaucoma patients undergoing phacoemulsification alone have a higher rate of refractive surprise compared to patients without glaucoma. This risk is further increased with combined filtering procedures. Indeed, there are few and conflicting reports on the effect of combined phacoemulsification and micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Here, we look at refractive outcomes of glaucoma patients undergoing phacoemulsification with and without Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) goniotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of 385 glaucomatous eyes of 281 patients, which underwent either phacoemulsification alone (<i>n</i> = 309) or phacoemulsification with KDB goniotomy (<i>n</i> = 76, phaco-KDB) at the University of Colorado. The main outcome was refractive surprise defined as the difference in target and postoperative refraction spherical equivalent greater than ±0.5 Diopter (D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Refractive surprise greater than ±0.5 D occurred in 26.3% of eyes in the phaco-KDB group and 36.2% in the phacoemulsification group (<i>p</i> = 0.11). Refractive surprise greater than ±1.0 D occurred in 6.6% for the phaco-KDB group and 9.7% for the phacoemulsification group (<i>p</i> = 0.08). There was no significant difference in risk of refractive surprise when pre-operative IOP, axial length, keratometry or performance of KDB goniotomy were assessed in univariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference between refractive outcomes of glaucomatous patients undergoing phacoemulsification with or without KDB goniotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12194,"journal":{"name":"Eye and Vision","volume":"6 ","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40662-019-0153-2","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refractive outcomes among glaucoma patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract extraction with and without Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Erin G Sieck,&nbsp;Cara E Capitena Young,&nbsp;Rebecca S Epstein,&nbsp;Jeffrey R SooHoo,&nbsp;Mina B Pantcheva,&nbsp;Jennifer L Patnaik,&nbsp;Anne M Lynch,&nbsp;Malik Y Kahook,&nbsp;Leonard K Seibold\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40662-019-0153-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glaucoma patients undergoing phacoemulsification alone have a higher rate of refractive surprise compared to patients without glaucoma. This risk is further increased with combined filtering procedures. Indeed, there are few and conflicting reports on the effect of combined phacoemulsification and micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Here, we look at refractive outcomes of glaucoma patients undergoing phacoemulsification with and without Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) goniotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of 385 glaucomatous eyes of 281 patients, which underwent either phacoemulsification alone (<i>n</i> = 309) or phacoemulsification with KDB goniotomy (<i>n</i> = 76, phaco-KDB) at the University of Colorado. The main outcome was refractive surprise defined as the difference in target and postoperative refraction spherical equivalent greater than ±0.5 Diopter (D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Refractive surprise greater than ±0.5 D occurred in 26.3% of eyes in the phaco-KDB group and 36.2% in the phacoemulsification group (<i>p</i> = 0.11). Refractive surprise greater than ±1.0 D occurred in 6.6% for the phaco-KDB group and 9.7% for the phacoemulsification group (<i>p</i> = 0.08). There was no significant difference in risk of refractive surprise when pre-operative IOP, axial length, keratometry or performance of KDB goniotomy were assessed in univariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference between refractive outcomes of glaucomatous patients undergoing phacoemulsification with or without KDB goniotomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye and Vision\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40662-019-0153-2\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye and Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-019-0153-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-019-0153-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

背景:与没有青光眼的患者相比,单独进行白内障超声乳化术的青光眼患者有更高的屈光意外发生率。联合过滤程序会进一步增加这种风险。事实上,关于白内障超声乳化和微创青光眼手术(MIGS)的效果,很少有相互矛盾的报道。在这里,我们观察了青光眼患者在白内障超声乳化白内障摘除术中使用和不使用卡胡克双刀片(KDB)角切开术的屈光结果。方法:回顾性分析281例385眼青光眼患者的临床资料 = 309)或白内障超声乳化联合KDB角切开术(n = 76,phaco KDB)。主要结果是屈光惊喜,定义为目标和术后屈光球当量的差异大于±0.5屈光度(D)。结果:白内障超声乳化KDB组和超声乳化白内障超声乳化术组分别有26.3%和36.2%的患者出现了大于±0.5D的屈光不正(p = 0.11)。白内障超声乳化术KDB组和超声乳化术组分别有6.6%和9.7%的患者出现大于±1.0D的屈光不正(p = 0.08)。在单变量分析中评估术前IOP、轴长、角膜曲率或KDB角切开术的性能时,屈光意外的风险没有显著差异。结论:白内障患者行白内障超声乳化白内障摘除术与不行KDB角切开术的屈光效果无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refractive outcomes among glaucoma patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract extraction with and without Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy.

Background: Glaucoma patients undergoing phacoemulsification alone have a higher rate of refractive surprise compared to patients without glaucoma. This risk is further increased with combined filtering procedures. Indeed, there are few and conflicting reports on the effect of combined phacoemulsification and micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Here, we look at refractive outcomes of glaucoma patients undergoing phacoemulsification with and without Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) goniotomy.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of 385 glaucomatous eyes of 281 patients, which underwent either phacoemulsification alone (n = 309) or phacoemulsification with KDB goniotomy (n = 76, phaco-KDB) at the University of Colorado. The main outcome was refractive surprise defined as the difference in target and postoperative refraction spherical equivalent greater than ±0.5 Diopter (D).

Results: Refractive surprise greater than ±0.5 D occurred in 26.3% of eyes in the phaco-KDB group and 36.2% in the phacoemulsification group (p = 0.11). Refractive surprise greater than ±1.0 D occurred in 6.6% for the phaco-KDB group and 9.7% for the phacoemulsification group (p = 0.08). There was no significant difference in risk of refractive surprise when pre-operative IOP, axial length, keratometry or performance of KDB goniotomy were assessed in univariate analyses.

Conclusion: There was no difference between refractive outcomes of glaucomatous patients undergoing phacoemulsification with or without KDB goniotomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eye and Vision
Eye and Vision OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye and Vision is an open access, peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. It welcomes research articles, reviews, methodologies, commentaries, case reports, perspectives and short reports encompassing all aspects of eye and vision. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: current developments of theoretical, experimental and clinical investigations in ophthalmology, optometry and vision science which focus on novel and high-impact findings on central issues pertaining to biology, pathophysiology and etiology of eye diseases as well as advances in diagnostic techniques, surgical treatment, instrument updates, the latest drug findings, results of clinical trials and research findings. It aims to provide ophthalmologists and visual science specialists with the latest developments in theoretical, experimental and clinical investigations in eye and vision.
期刊最新文献
Levodopa is associated with reduced development of new-onset geographic atrophy in patients with age-related macular degeneration. A review of the application of in-vivo confocal microscopy on conjunctival diseases. Comparison of bilateral implantation of monofocal intraocular lenses with enhanced intermediate function targeting with - 2.00 D and emmetropia in moderate to high myopic Asian patients. Visual and patient reported outcomes provided by a refractive multifocal intraocular lens based on continuous transitional focus. Inflammatory and genomic interactions within keratoconus susceptible patients: a nationwide registered case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1