[无症状颈动脉狭窄的再治疗-合理还是过时?]

Q4 Medicine Praxis Pub Date : 2023-09-01
Benedikt Reutersberg, Thomas Stadlbauer, Philip Düppers, Lorenz Meuli, Alexander Zimmermann
{"title":"[无症状颈动脉狭窄的再治疗-合理还是过时?]","authors":"Benedikt Reutersberg,&nbsp;Thomas Stadlbauer,&nbsp;Philip Düppers,&nbsp;Lorenz Meuli,&nbsp;Alexander Zimmermann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recommendations for surgical versus conservative treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) are based on prospective randomized trials, some of which were performed several decades ago. However, during this time, \"best medical treatment\" (BMT) for conservative therapy of arteriosclerotic patients has evolved significantly. Because of the associated risk reduction of ACS, surgical therapy is increasingly being questioned. By identifying clinical and morphological risk parameters, subgroups could be identified that might, however, benefit from invasive therapy. Consequently, multidisciplinary therapy decision-making requires an increasingly patient-individualized approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20494,"journal":{"name":"Praxis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Revascularisation of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis - Reasonable or Obsolete?]\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt Reutersberg,&nbsp;Thomas Stadlbauer,&nbsp;Philip Düppers,&nbsp;Lorenz Meuli,&nbsp;Alexander Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recommendations for surgical versus conservative treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) are based on prospective randomized trials, some of which were performed several decades ago. However, during this time, \\\"best medical treatment\\\" (BMT) for conservative therapy of arteriosclerotic patients has evolved significantly. Because of the associated risk reduction of ACS, surgical therapy is increasingly being questioned. By identifying clinical and morphological risk parameters, subgroups could be identified that might, however, benefit from invasive therapy. Consequently, multidisciplinary therapy decision-making requires an increasingly patient-individualized approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praxis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:手术治疗与保守治疗无症状颈动脉狭窄(ACS)的建议基于前瞻性随机试验,其中一些试验是几十年前进行的。然而,在这段时间里,动脉硬化患者保守治疗的“最佳药物治疗”(BMT)有了显著的发展。由于ACS的相关风险降低,外科治疗越来越受到质疑。通过确定临床和形态学风险参数,可以确定可能受益于侵入性治疗的亚组。因此,多学科治疗决策需要越来越多的患者个性化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Revascularisation of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis - Reasonable or Obsolete?]

Introduction: Recommendations for surgical versus conservative treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) are based on prospective randomized trials, some of which were performed several decades ago. However, during this time, "best medical treatment" (BMT) for conservative therapy of arteriosclerotic patients has evolved significantly. Because of the associated risk reduction of ACS, surgical therapy is increasingly being questioned. By identifying clinical and morphological risk parameters, subgroups could be identified that might, however, benefit from invasive therapy. Consequently, multidisciplinary therapy decision-making requires an increasingly patient-individualized approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Praxis
Praxis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[28-year-old male patient with headaches on the left side and facial pain]. [Can we learn to die?] [Diagnosis and treatment of venous thrombosis]. [Erythema and flu symptoms of a hunter with pre-existing conditions]. [Snakebite in Switzerland - a potentially life-threatening event?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1