初级保健中的虚弱和多药治疗。

Biological research for nursing Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1177/10998004231179485
Baki Derhem, Süleyman Özsari
{"title":"初级保健中的虚弱和多药治疗。","authors":"Baki Derhem,&nbsp;Süleyman Özsari","doi":"10.1177/10998004231179485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a clinical judgement-based frailty tool developed from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Many studies on the measurement of frailty and its effect on clinical outcomes have been conducted on patients hospitalized, especially in intensive care units. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between polypharmacy and frailty on outpatient older adult patients in primary care.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 298 patients who were aged ≥65 years and admitted to Yenimahalle Family Health Center between May-2022 and July-2022. Frailty was evaluated by using CFS. Polypharmacy was defined as five medications or more and \"excessive polypharmacy\" as 10 medications or more. The medications below five are grouped as \"no polypharmacy\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significance between age groups, gender, smoking status, marital status, polypharmacy status, and FS (<i>p =</i> .003 and η<sup>2</sup>: .20; <i>p <</i> .001 and Cohen d: .80; <i>p =</i> .018 and Cohen d: .35; <i>p <</i> .001 and Cohen d: 1.10 and <i>p <</i> .001 and η<sup>2</sup>: 1.45 respectively). A strong, positive correlation was found between polypharmacy and the frailty score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Polypharmacy, especially excessive polypharmacy, may be a promising adjunct to frailty in identifying older patients whose health is more likely to worsen. Providers in primary care should also consider frailty when prescribing drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93901,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":"25 4","pages":"658-663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty and Polypharmacy in Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Baki Derhem,&nbsp;Süleyman Özsari\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10998004231179485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a clinical judgement-based frailty tool developed from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Many studies on the measurement of frailty and its effect on clinical outcomes have been conducted on patients hospitalized, especially in intensive care units. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between polypharmacy and frailty on outpatient older adult patients in primary care.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 298 patients who were aged ≥65 years and admitted to Yenimahalle Family Health Center between May-2022 and July-2022. Frailty was evaluated by using CFS. Polypharmacy was defined as five medications or more and \\\"excessive polypharmacy\\\" as 10 medications or more. The medications below five are grouped as \\\"no polypharmacy\\\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significance between age groups, gender, smoking status, marital status, polypharmacy status, and FS (<i>p =</i> .003 and η<sup>2</sup>: .20; <i>p <</i> .001 and Cohen d: .80; <i>p =</i> .018 and Cohen d: .35; <i>p <</i> .001 and Cohen d: 1.10 and <i>p <</i> .001 and η<sup>2</sup>: 1.45 respectively). A strong, positive correlation was found between polypharmacy and the frailty score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Polypharmacy, especially excessive polypharmacy, may be a promising adjunct to frailty in identifying older patients whose health is more likely to worsen. Providers in primary care should also consider frailty when prescribing drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"658-663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004231179485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004231179485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:临床虚弱量表(CFS)是根据加拿大健康与老龄化研究开发的一种基于临床判断的虚弱工具。许多关于虚弱程度及其对临床结果影响的研究都是在住院患者身上进行的,尤其是在重症监护室。本研究的目的是检验初级保健门诊老年患者的多药治疗与虚弱之间的关系。材料和方法:这项横断面研究包括298名年龄≥65岁的患者,他们于2022年5月至2022年7月期间入住Yenimahalle家庭健康中心。使用CFS评估脆弱性。多药治疗定义为5种或5种以上药物,“过度多药治疗”定义为10种或10种以上药物。结果:年龄组、性别、吸烟状况、婚姻状况、多药治疗状况和FS之间具有统计学意义(p=0.003和η2:.20;p=0.001和Cohen d:.80;p=0.018和Cohen d:.35;.001和Cohen分别为1.10和.001和η2:1.45)。发现多药治疗与虚弱评分之间存在强烈的正相关。结论:多药治疗,特别是过度多药治疗可能是一种很有前途的治疗虚弱的辅助手段,可以识别健康状况更可能恶化的老年患者。初级保健提供者在开药时也应该考虑到虚弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frailty and Polypharmacy in Primary Care.

Introduction: The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a clinical judgement-based frailty tool developed from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Many studies on the measurement of frailty and its effect on clinical outcomes have been conducted on patients hospitalized, especially in intensive care units. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between polypharmacy and frailty on outpatient older adult patients in primary care.

Materials and method: This cross-sectional study included 298 patients who were aged ≥65 years and admitted to Yenimahalle Family Health Center between May-2022 and July-2022. Frailty was evaluated by using CFS. Polypharmacy was defined as five medications or more and "excessive polypharmacy" as 10 medications or more. The medications below five are grouped as "no polypharmacy".

Results: There was a statistically significance between age groups, gender, smoking status, marital status, polypharmacy status, and FS (p = .003 and η2: .20; p < .001 and Cohen d: .80; p = .018 and Cohen d: .35; p < .001 and Cohen d: 1.10 and p < .001 and η2: 1.45 respectively). A strong, positive correlation was found between polypharmacy and the frailty score.

Conclusion: Polypharmacy, especially excessive polypharmacy, may be a promising adjunct to frailty in identifying older patients whose health is more likely to worsen. Providers in primary care should also consider frailty when prescribing drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Serum Albumin and the Length of Hospital Stay Among Patients With Acute Heart Failure. L-Shaped Associations Between Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index and Hearing Loss: A Cross-Sectional Study From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The Effects of Aquatic Exercise Training on Functional and Hemodynamic Responses in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Melatonin in Human Milk: A Scoping Review. Plant-Based Diets and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults: An Integrative Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1