β受体阻滞剂转为高血压一线治疗。

IF 98.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL The Lancet Pub Date : 2023-11-11 Epub Date: 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01733-6
Franz H Messerli, Sripal Bangalore, John M Mandrola
{"title":"β受体阻滞剂转为高血压一线治疗。","authors":"Franz H Messerli, Sripal Bangalore, John M Mandrola","doi":"10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01733-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In their recent guidelines, the European Society of Hypertension upgraded β blockers, putting them on equal footing with thiazide diuretics, renin-angiotensin system blockers (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers), and calcium channel blockers. The reason offered for upgrading β blockers was the observation that they are often used for many other clinical conditions commonly encountered with hypertension. This upgrade would allow for the treatment of two conditions with a single drug (a so-called twofer). In most current national and international hypertension guidelines, β blockers are only considered to be an alternative when there are specific indications. Compared with the other first-line antihypertensive drug classes, β blockers are significantly less effective in preventing stroke and cardiovascular mortality. To relegate β blockers to an inferiority status as previous guidelines have done was based on the evidence in aggregate, and still stands. No new evidence supports the switch of β blockers back to first-line therapy. We are concerned that this move might lead to widespread harm because of inferior stroke protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":18014,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":" ","pages":"1802-1804"},"PeriodicalIF":98.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"β blockers switched to first-line therapy in hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Franz H Messerli, Sripal Bangalore, John M Mandrola\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01733-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In their recent guidelines, the European Society of Hypertension upgraded β blockers, putting them on equal footing with thiazide diuretics, renin-angiotensin system blockers (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers), and calcium channel blockers. The reason offered for upgrading β blockers was the observation that they are often used for many other clinical conditions commonly encountered with hypertension. This upgrade would allow for the treatment of two conditions with a single drug (a so-called twofer). In most current national and international hypertension guidelines, β blockers are only considered to be an alternative when there are specific indications. Compared with the other first-line antihypertensive drug classes, β blockers are significantly less effective in preventing stroke and cardiovascular mortality. To relegate β blockers to an inferiority status as previous guidelines have done was based on the evidence in aggregate, and still stands. No new evidence supports the switch of β blockers back to first-line therapy. We are concerned that this move might lead to widespread harm because of inferior stroke protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1802-1804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":98.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01733-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01733-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在最近的指南中,欧洲高血压学会对β受体阻滞剂进行了升级,使其与噻嗪类利尿剂、肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂(如血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)和钙通道阻滞剂处于同等地位。升级β受体阻滞剂的原因是观察到它们经常用于高血压常见的许多其他临床情况。这种升级将允许用一种药物(所谓的twofer)治疗两种情况。在大多数现行的国家和国际高血压指南中,只有在有特定适应症时,β受体阻滞剂才被认为是一种替代方案。与其他一线抗高血压药物相比,β受体阻滞剂在预防中风和心血管死亡率方面的效果明显较差。按照以前的指导方针,将β受体阻滞剂降级为劣效状态是基于总体证据,并且仍然有效。没有新的证据支持β受体阻滞剂回归一线治疗。我们担心,由于中风防护不力,此举可能会导致广泛的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
β blockers switched to first-line therapy in hypertension.

In their recent guidelines, the European Society of Hypertension upgraded β blockers, putting them on equal footing with thiazide diuretics, renin-angiotensin system blockers (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers), and calcium channel blockers. The reason offered for upgrading β blockers was the observation that they are often used for many other clinical conditions commonly encountered with hypertension. This upgrade would allow for the treatment of two conditions with a single drug (a so-called twofer). In most current national and international hypertension guidelines, β blockers are only considered to be an alternative when there are specific indications. Compared with the other first-line antihypertensive drug classes, β blockers are significantly less effective in preventing stroke and cardiovascular mortality. To relegate β blockers to an inferiority status as previous guidelines have done was based on the evidence in aggregate, and still stands. No new evidence supports the switch of β blockers back to first-line therapy. We are concerned that this move might lead to widespread harm because of inferior stroke protection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet
The Lancet 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
148.10
自引率
0.70%
发文量
2220
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Lancet is a world-leading source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge. It was founded in 1823 by Thomas Wakley and has been an independent, international weekly general medical journal since then. The journal has an Impact Factor of 168.9, ranking first among 167 general and internal medicine journals globally. It also has a Scopus CiteScore of 133·2, ranking it second among 830 general medicine journals. The Lancet's mission is to make science widely available to serve and transform society, positively impacting people's lives. Throughout its history, The Lancet has been dedicated to addressing urgent topics, initiating debate, providing context for scientific research, and influencing decision makers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Non-communicable diseases: can implementation research change the game for policy and practice? Priorities for sickle cell disease global research and implementation. Addressing global gun violence: a Lancet Commission on Global Gun Violence and Health. Changing the culture of blood culture. The time to address the antibiotic pipeline and access crisis is now.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1