Jesús E Rodríguez-Silverio, Luis M García-Núñez, Edgar F Hernández-García, Héctor F Noyola-Villalobos, Luis F Moreno-Delagado
{"title":"与腹部再干预和VAC治疗相关的外伤性开放性腹部肠大气瘘。","authors":"Jesús E Rodríguez-Silverio, Luis M García-Núñez, Edgar F Hernández-García, Héctor F Noyola-Villalobos, Luis F Moreno-Delagado","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.22000419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open abdomen is an alternative for the management of trauma patient, and negative pressure therapy of the wound using VAC<sup>®</sup> device is a genuine sort of treatment. Although the device poses technical advantages, risks are present and a critical complication is the enteroatmospheric fistula formation (EAF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analize the role of negative pressure therapy length and VAC<sup>®</sup> device number of changes on the EAF formation in trauma patients udergoing open abdomen.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cut-off points were calculated using receiver operational characteristics curve. Values were compared with Student's t or Mann-Withney U tests, considering statistically significant p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EAF were present in 39 cases (5.9%). A significant difference in the presence of EAF was present in patients with negative pressure therapy of the wound length ≥ 11.2 days (46.9 vs. 1.3%; relative risk [RR]: 3.67; 95% confidence interval [95% IC]: 2.4-6.68; p = 0.017) and when ≥ 2.6 VAC<sup>®</sup> device changes were performed (34.6 vs. 0.5%; RR: 6.92; 95% IC: 1.1-4.3; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At our institution, the practice of >3 VAC<sup>®</sup> device changes and length of therapy > 11 days should be carefully considered leading to reduce the risk of EAF formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":"91 5","pages":"658-663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enteroatmospheric fistulas in open abdomen in trauma associated with abdominal reintervention and VAC therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Jesús E Rodríguez-Silverio, Luis M García-Núñez, Edgar F Hernández-García, Héctor F Noyola-Villalobos, Luis F Moreno-Delagado\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/CIRU.22000419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open abdomen is an alternative for the management of trauma patient, and negative pressure therapy of the wound using VAC<sup>®</sup> device is a genuine sort of treatment. Although the device poses technical advantages, risks are present and a critical complication is the enteroatmospheric fistula formation (EAF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analize the role of negative pressure therapy length and VAC<sup>®</sup> device number of changes on the EAF formation in trauma patients udergoing open abdomen.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cut-off points were calculated using receiver operational characteristics curve. Values were compared with Student's t or Mann-Withney U tests, considering statistically significant p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EAF were present in 39 cases (5.9%). A significant difference in the presence of EAF was present in patients with negative pressure therapy of the wound length ≥ 11.2 days (46.9 vs. 1.3%; relative risk [RR]: 3.67; 95% confidence interval [95% IC]: 2.4-6.68; p = 0.017) and when ≥ 2.6 VAC<sup>®</sup> device changes were performed (34.6 vs. 0.5%; RR: 6.92; 95% IC: 1.1-4.3; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At our institution, the practice of >3 VAC<sup>®</sup> device changes and length of therapy > 11 days should be carefully considered leading to reduce the risk of EAF formation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"volume\":\"91 5\",\"pages\":\"658-663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.22000419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.22000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enteroatmospheric fistulas in open abdomen in trauma associated with abdominal reintervention and VAC therapy.
Background: Open abdomen is an alternative for the management of trauma patient, and negative pressure therapy of the wound using VAC® device is a genuine sort of treatment. Although the device poses technical advantages, risks are present and a critical complication is the enteroatmospheric fistula formation (EAF).
Objective: To analize the role of negative pressure therapy length and VAC® device number of changes on the EAF formation in trauma patients udergoing open abdomen.
Method: Cut-off points were calculated using receiver operational characteristics curve. Values were compared with Student's t or Mann-Withney U tests, considering statistically significant p < 0.05.
Results: EAF were present in 39 cases (5.9%). A significant difference in the presence of EAF was present in patients with negative pressure therapy of the wound length ≥ 11.2 days (46.9 vs. 1.3%; relative risk [RR]: 3.67; 95% confidence interval [95% IC]: 2.4-6.68; p = 0.017) and when ≥ 2.6 VAC® device changes were performed (34.6 vs. 0.5%; RR: 6.92; 95% IC: 1.1-4.3; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: At our institution, the practice of >3 VAC® device changes and length of therapy > 11 days should be carefully considered leading to reduce the risk of EAF formation.