五年后:美国皮肤科医生地理密度和分布的持续差异

Christopher Nguyen, Q. Nguyen, Kyle C. Lauck, Adelaide Hebert
{"title":"五年后:美国皮肤科医生地理密度和分布的持续差异","authors":"Christopher Nguyen, Q. Nguyen, Kyle C. Lauck, Adelaide Hebert","doi":"10.25251/skin.7.3.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: A discrepancy exists in the geographical distribution of dermatologists across the United States (US). The aim of this study was to reexamine the current geographical density of dermatologists to describe any changes compared to date from 5 and 12 years ago. \nMethods: Membership data from the 2021 American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) database were retrieved to characterize the distribution of dermatologists in 3-digit zip code areas. \nResults: Out of 712 populated zip codes with dermatologists, 510 (71.6%) had less than 4 dermatologists per 100,000, as compared to 515 (72.3%) in 2016 (– 0.19% CAGR). The dermatologist density of the 100 most populated areas (M = 4.5 dermatologists per 100,000, SD = 3.3) and 100 least populated areas (M = 1.6 dermatologists per 100,000, SD = 6.2) were significantly different (P < 0.0001). \nConclusion: This analysis provides continued trends to compare to previous studies performed in 2016 and 2009. The highest and lowest density areas were similar to results from previous studies. The results indicate an enduring and significant maldistribution of dermatologists in the US.","PeriodicalId":74803,"journal":{"name":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","volume":" May","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Five Years Later: Continuing Disparity in the Geographic Density and Distribution of U.S. Dermatologists\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Nguyen, Q. Nguyen, Kyle C. Lauck, Adelaide Hebert\",\"doi\":\"10.25251/skin.7.3.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: A discrepancy exists in the geographical distribution of dermatologists across the United States (US). The aim of this study was to reexamine the current geographical density of dermatologists to describe any changes compared to date from 5 and 12 years ago. \\nMethods: Membership data from the 2021 American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) database were retrieved to characterize the distribution of dermatologists in 3-digit zip code areas. \\nResults: Out of 712 populated zip codes with dermatologists, 510 (71.6%) had less than 4 dermatologists per 100,000, as compared to 515 (72.3%) in 2016 (– 0.19% CAGR). The dermatologist density of the 100 most populated areas (M = 4.5 dermatologists per 100,000, SD = 3.3) and 100 least populated areas (M = 1.6 dermatologists per 100,000, SD = 6.2) were significantly different (P < 0.0001). \\nConclusion: This analysis provides continued trends to compare to previous studies performed in 2016 and 2009. The highest and lowest density areas were similar to results from previous studies. The results indicate an enduring and significant maldistribution of dermatologists in the US.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\" May\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.3.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.3.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国皮肤科医生的地理分布存在差异。本研究的目的是重新检查当前皮肤科医生的地理密度,以描述与5年和12年前相比的任何变化。方法:从2021年美国皮肤病学会(AAD)数据库中检索会员数据,以表征3位数邮政编码地区皮肤科医生的分布。结果:在712个有皮肤科医生的邮政编码中,510个(71.6%)每10万人中有不到4名皮肤科医生,而2016年为515个(72.3%)(复合年增长率为- 0.19%)。100个人口最多地区(M = 4.5 / 10万,SD = 3.3)和100个人口最少地区(M = 1.6 / 10万,SD = 6.2)的皮肤科医生密度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。结论:该分析提供了与2016年和2009年进行的先前研究相比的持续趋势。最高和最低密度区域的结果与以前的研究结果相似。结果表明一个持久的和显著的皮肤科医生在美国分布不均。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Five Years Later: Continuing Disparity in the Geographic Density and Distribution of U.S. Dermatologists
Objectives: A discrepancy exists in the geographical distribution of dermatologists across the United States (US). The aim of this study was to reexamine the current geographical density of dermatologists to describe any changes compared to date from 5 and 12 years ago. Methods: Membership data from the 2021 American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) database were retrieved to characterize the distribution of dermatologists in 3-digit zip code areas. Results: Out of 712 populated zip codes with dermatologists, 510 (71.6%) had less than 4 dermatologists per 100,000, as compared to 515 (72.3%) in 2016 (– 0.19% CAGR). The dermatologist density of the 100 most populated areas (M = 4.5 dermatologists per 100,000, SD = 3.3) and 100 least populated areas (M = 1.6 dermatologists per 100,000, SD = 6.2) were significantly different (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: This analysis provides continued trends to compare to previous studies performed in 2016 and 2009. The highest and lowest density areas were similar to results from previous studies. The results indicate an enduring and significant maldistribution of dermatologists in the US.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Age or Sex on Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%/Adapalene 0.15% Gel in Participants with Moderate-to-Severe Acne Cryoglobulinemia Type I in Patient with History of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Unknown Significance: A Case Report A Suspected Case of Imported Yaws in New York Syphilis in HIV Positive Individuals and the Importance of a Skin Exam: A Case Report Beware of the “Blue Nevus”: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1