FunCaps框架:重新定义操作一致性

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT Organizacija Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.2478/orga-2021-0018
Olfat Ganji Bidmeshk, Mohammad Mehraeen, A. Pooya, Yaghoob Maharati
{"title":"FunCaps框架:重新定义操作一致性","authors":"Olfat Ganji Bidmeshk, Mohammad Mehraeen, A. Pooya, Yaghoob Maharati","doi":"10.2478/orga-2021-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and purpose: Operational alignment, the alignment between business processes (BPs) and information systems (ISs), is a well-acknowledged requirement for improving business efficiency. However, a lack of sound foundation for the practical implementation of operational alignment remains in the existing literature. This is, in part, because previously developed coarse-grained strategic alignment models for operational alignment have overlooked the differences between strategic and operational levels of alignment. Additionally, while some studies have recognized these differences, they remain limited. This is partly due to their negligence of the IS’s socio-technical nature or their focus on identifying the social antecedents and their effect on operational alignment, without considering how ISs meet the business requirements in achieving operational alignment. To overcome this potential lack of applicability, the purpose of this paper is to determine the right level of abstraction for describing BPs and ISs and reconceptualizing operational alignment. Methodology: This paper conducts empirical research using a grounded theory (GT), centering on semi-structured interviews with 28 experts involved in the Iranian top public universities. Data were analyzed by using MAXQDA software. Results: The resulting FunCaps framework specifies the required combinations of BP functions and IS capabilities for operational alignment. Conclusion: FunCaps reconceptualizes operational alignment based on operational planning and reciprocal integration and establishes the broader picture by considering an IS as a socio-technical system.","PeriodicalId":44901,"journal":{"name":"Organizacija","volume":" 45","pages":"256 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The FunCaps Framework: Reconceptualizing Operational Alignment\",\"authors\":\"Olfat Ganji Bidmeshk, Mohammad Mehraeen, A. Pooya, Yaghoob Maharati\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/orga-2021-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background and purpose: Operational alignment, the alignment between business processes (BPs) and information systems (ISs), is a well-acknowledged requirement for improving business efficiency. However, a lack of sound foundation for the practical implementation of operational alignment remains in the existing literature. This is, in part, because previously developed coarse-grained strategic alignment models for operational alignment have overlooked the differences between strategic and operational levels of alignment. Additionally, while some studies have recognized these differences, they remain limited. This is partly due to their negligence of the IS’s socio-technical nature or their focus on identifying the social antecedents and their effect on operational alignment, without considering how ISs meet the business requirements in achieving operational alignment. To overcome this potential lack of applicability, the purpose of this paper is to determine the right level of abstraction for describing BPs and ISs and reconceptualizing operational alignment. Methodology: This paper conducts empirical research using a grounded theory (GT), centering on semi-structured interviews with 28 experts involved in the Iranian top public universities. Data were analyzed by using MAXQDA software. Results: The resulting FunCaps framework specifies the required combinations of BP functions and IS capabilities for operational alignment. Conclusion: FunCaps reconceptualizes operational alignment based on operational planning and reciprocal integration and establishes the broader picture by considering an IS as a socio-technical system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizacija\",\"volume\":\" 45\",\"pages\":\"256 - 274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizacija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizacija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要背景和目的:运营一致性,即业务流程(BP)和信息系统(is)之间的一致性,是提高业务效率的公认要求。然而,现有文献中仍然缺乏实际实施业务调整的坚实基础。这在一定程度上是因为以前开发的用于作战协调的粗粒度战略协调模型忽略了战略和作战协调级别之间的差异。此外,尽管一些研究已经认识到这些差异,但它们仍然有限。这在一定程度上是由于他们忽视了is的社会技术性质,或者他们专注于识别社会前因及其对运营一致性的影响,而没有考虑is如何在实现运营一致性方面满足业务要求。为了克服这种潜在的适用性不足,本文的目的是确定描述BP和is的正确抽象级别,并重新定义操作一致性。方法论:本文采用扎根理论(GT)对伊朗顶尖公立大学的28名专家进行半结构化访谈,进行实证研究。使用MAXQDA软件对数据进行分析。结果:由此产生的FunCaps框架规定了作战调整所需的BP功能和IS功能的组合。结论:FunCaps基于作战规划和相互整合重新定义了作战路线,并通过将IS视为一个社会技术系统来建立更广泛的图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The FunCaps Framework: Reconceptualizing Operational Alignment
Abstract Background and purpose: Operational alignment, the alignment between business processes (BPs) and information systems (ISs), is a well-acknowledged requirement for improving business efficiency. However, a lack of sound foundation for the practical implementation of operational alignment remains in the existing literature. This is, in part, because previously developed coarse-grained strategic alignment models for operational alignment have overlooked the differences between strategic and operational levels of alignment. Additionally, while some studies have recognized these differences, they remain limited. This is partly due to their negligence of the IS’s socio-technical nature or their focus on identifying the social antecedents and their effect on operational alignment, without considering how ISs meet the business requirements in achieving operational alignment. To overcome this potential lack of applicability, the purpose of this paper is to determine the right level of abstraction for describing BPs and ISs and reconceptualizing operational alignment. Methodology: This paper conducts empirical research using a grounded theory (GT), centering on semi-structured interviews with 28 experts involved in the Iranian top public universities. Data were analyzed by using MAXQDA software. Results: The resulting FunCaps framework specifies the required combinations of BP functions and IS capabilities for operational alignment. Conclusion: FunCaps reconceptualizes operational alignment based on operational planning and reciprocal integration and establishes the broader picture by considering an IS as a socio-technical system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organizacija
Organizacija MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Organizacija (Journal of Management, Information Systems and Human Resources) is an interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal that seeks both theoretical and practical papers devoted to managerial aspects of the subject matter indicated in the title. In particular the journal focuses on papers which cover state-of art developments in the subject area of the journal, its implementation and use in the organizational practice. Organizacija is covered by numerous Abstracting & Indexing services, including SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
Narcissistic Leadership and Project Success: The Role of Knowledge Sharing and Collectivism in IT Firms Can Machiavellianism and Money Intentions Influence Entrepreneurial Intention? Motherhood Gap and Employer Discrimination. A Qualitative Investigation in the German Context Role of Hotel Management Crisis in Covid-19 and Post-Covid-19 Period: A Case Study of Opatija Riviera Micro-Region in Croatia Born Globals and Born Sustainables: Motives of Accumulating Wealth and of Making a Difference in the World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1