群体需要领导者吗?:代表西欧君主制衰落后的政体,从霍布斯到迪尔凯姆

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION Political Theology Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1080/1462317X.2022.2152180
Robert A. Yelle
{"title":"群体需要领导者吗?:代表西欧君主制衰落后的政体,从霍布斯到迪尔凯姆","authors":"Robert A. Yelle","doi":"10.1080/1462317X.2022.2152180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n The Political Imaginarium, which is the topic of this special issue, is not static. Older modes of representing the body politic, as illustrated by Ernst Kantorowicz’s account of the King’s Two Bodies, were focused on the figure of the monarch. With the transition to democratic republics based on popular sovereignty, was this older aesthetic of sovereignty abandoned, extended, or transformed? I argue that the shift to focus on the People represented only a partial break with older modes of representation, due to the difficulty of figuring the masses as such in their unformed condition. Case studies from England and France suggest that the problem of representation remains without a final solution.","PeriodicalId":43759,"journal":{"name":"Political Theology","volume":"29 33","pages":"15 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Crowds Need Leaders?: Representing the Body Politic after the Decline of Monarchy in Western Europe, from Hobbes to Durkheim\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Yelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1462317X.2022.2152180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n The Political Imaginarium, which is the topic of this special issue, is not static. Older modes of representing the body politic, as illustrated by Ernst Kantorowicz’s account of the King’s Two Bodies, were focused on the figure of the monarch. With the transition to democratic republics based on popular sovereignty, was this older aesthetic of sovereignty abandoned, extended, or transformed? I argue that the shift to focus on the People represented only a partial break with older modes of representation, due to the difficulty of figuring the masses as such in their unformed condition. Case studies from England and France suggest that the problem of representation remains without a final solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Theology\",\"volume\":\"29 33\",\"pages\":\"15 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2022.2152180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2022.2152180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本期特刊的主题《政治幻想馆》并非一成不变。恩斯特·坎托罗维奇(Ernst Kantorowicz)对《国王的两个身体》(King’s Two Bodies)的描述表明,代表政治体的旧模式集中在君主的形象上。随着向以人民主权为基础的民主共和国的过渡,这种古老的主权美学是被抛弃、扩展还是转变了?我认为,关注人民的转变只是与旧的代表模式的部分决裂,因为很难将群众想象成处于未成形状态的人。来自英格兰和法国的案例研究表明,代表权问题仍然没有最终解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Crowds Need Leaders?: Representing the Body Politic after the Decline of Monarchy in Western Europe, from Hobbes to Durkheim
ABSTRACT The Political Imaginarium, which is the topic of this special issue, is not static. Older modes of representing the body politic, as illustrated by Ernst Kantorowicz’s account of the King’s Two Bodies, were focused on the figure of the monarch. With the transition to democratic republics based on popular sovereignty, was this older aesthetic of sovereignty abandoned, extended, or transformed? I argue that the shift to focus on the People represented only a partial break with older modes of representation, due to the difficulty of figuring the masses as such in their unformed condition. Case studies from England and France suggest that the problem of representation remains without a final solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Political Theology
Political Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊最新文献
The Blue Horse of Poetry. Decolonial Poetics, Transsecular Reading, and Ecocritical Affinities in Elicura Chihuailaf Is Literature Secular? Transsecular Politics of Literature and Hermeneutics of Hospitality Rome Better Than Christ: Levinas’s (Negative) Political Theology Black Surfeit, Black Grief: Not of Meaning nor Measure Negating Futures: Race, Queerness and the Force of the Negative in David Marriott’s Psychopolitics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1