转让合伙企业的股权集中

G. Crisp, Emily Kolby, Charlie R. Potter
{"title":"转让合伙企业的股权集中","authors":"G. Crisp, Emily Kolby, Charlie R. Potter","doi":"10.24926/jcotr.v29i2.4629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transfer partnerships do not necessarily produce equitable outcomes. A lack of scholarship identifying critical practices needed to make partnerships equitable impedes transfer success. Based on a review and analysis of existing literature, this paper proposes a three-stage transfer partnership framework focused on designing, implementing, and assessing partnership practices that center equity. Kania and Kramer’s theory of collective impact and Bensimon and Malcom’s equity scorecard are used as dual lenses through which partners should approach these efforts. This framework encourages practitioners to adopt innovative ways to center equity and carries specific implications for admissions and retention professionals. \nKeywords: equity, transfer students, partnerships, diversity","PeriodicalId":34700,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Orientation Transition and Retention","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centering Equity in Transfer Partnerships\",\"authors\":\"G. Crisp, Emily Kolby, Charlie R. Potter\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/jcotr.v29i2.4629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transfer partnerships do not necessarily produce equitable outcomes. A lack of scholarship identifying critical practices needed to make partnerships equitable impedes transfer success. Based on a review and analysis of existing literature, this paper proposes a three-stage transfer partnership framework focused on designing, implementing, and assessing partnership practices that center equity. Kania and Kramer’s theory of collective impact and Bensimon and Malcom’s equity scorecard are used as dual lenses through which partners should approach these efforts. This framework encourages practitioners to adopt innovative ways to center equity and carries specific implications for admissions and retention professionals. \\nKeywords: equity, transfer students, partnerships, diversity\",\"PeriodicalId\":34700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Orientation Transition and Retention\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Orientation Transition and Retention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v29i2.4629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Orientation Transition and Retention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v29i2.4629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转让伙伴关系不一定能产生公平的结果。缺乏确定使伙伴关系公平所需关键做法的奖学金阻碍了转让的成功。在回顾和分析现有文献的基础上,本文提出了一个三阶段的转移伙伴关系框架,重点是设计、实施和评估以公平为中心的伙伴关系实践。Kania和Kramer的集体影响理论以及Bensimon和Malcom的股权记分卡被用作合作伙伴应对这些努力的双重视角。该框架鼓励从业者采用创新的方式以公平为中心,并对招生和留用专业人员产生具体影响。关键词:公平、转学生、伙伴关系、多样性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Centering Equity in Transfer Partnerships
Transfer partnerships do not necessarily produce equitable outcomes. A lack of scholarship identifying critical practices needed to make partnerships equitable impedes transfer success. Based on a review and analysis of existing literature, this paper proposes a three-stage transfer partnership framework focused on designing, implementing, and assessing partnership practices that center equity. Kania and Kramer’s theory of collective impact and Bensimon and Malcom’s equity scorecard are used as dual lenses through which partners should approach these efforts. This framework encourages practitioners to adopt innovative ways to center equity and carries specific implications for admissions and retention professionals. Keywords: equity, transfer students, partnerships, diversity
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
How to Get Filthy Rich in Rising Asia Lived Experiences of Freshman College Students During a Pandemic Springforward and STEP: Assessing the Outcomes of a Two-Part Academic Success Initiative Building the Bridge: Practical Considerations for Student Affairs Practitioners and Faculty to Support Black Students in First Year Seminars Parents’ Perceptions of Involvement in Their Students’ First Year in College
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1