参与式研究与赋权:对另类社会科学研究辩论的概念回顾

Youba Raj Luitel
{"title":"参与式研究与赋权:对另类社会科学研究辩论的概念回顾","authors":"Youba Raj Luitel","doi":"10.3126/DSAJ.V11I0.18825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the 1970s, there has been a growing emphasis on participatory research aimed at capturing people’s lived realities of everyday lives. The proponents of participatory research (also called alternative research) build on a critique of what is called “extractive,” top-down, and so-called objective empirical research of positivist kind. In contrast, alternative research method embeds research with empowerment and regards survey based conventional research as instrumental. This paper first introduces basic premises of alternative research method together with its philosophical underpinning. Drawing arguments from Robert Chambers the following section compares and contrasts the conventional and alternative research methods. Further, a paradigm shift in social science research in terms of reversals of frame, reversals of modes, reversal of relation and reversal of power is dealt. The final section draws a conclusion that compared to survey based, “objective,” conventional research method, participatory researches are superior in facilitating knowledge generation process, eventually empowering the people.Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Vol.11, 2017; 115-129","PeriodicalId":30105,"journal":{"name":"Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/DSAJ.V11I0.18825","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participatory Research and Empowerment: A Conceptual Revisit of the Debate on Alternative Social Science Research\",\"authors\":\"Youba Raj Luitel\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/DSAJ.V11I0.18825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the 1970s, there has been a growing emphasis on participatory research aimed at capturing people’s lived realities of everyday lives. The proponents of participatory research (also called alternative research) build on a critique of what is called “extractive,” top-down, and so-called objective empirical research of positivist kind. In contrast, alternative research method embeds research with empowerment and regards survey based conventional research as instrumental. This paper first introduces basic premises of alternative research method together with its philosophical underpinning. Drawing arguments from Robert Chambers the following section compares and contrasts the conventional and alternative research methods. Further, a paradigm shift in social science research in terms of reversals of frame, reversals of modes, reversal of relation and reversal of power is dealt. The final section draws a conclusion that compared to survey based, “objective,” conventional research method, participatory researches are superior in facilitating knowledge generation process, eventually empowering the people.Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Vol.11, 2017; 115-129\",\"PeriodicalId\":30105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/DSAJ.V11I0.18825\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/DSAJ.V11I0.18825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/DSAJ.V11I0.18825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

20世纪70年代之后,人们越来越重视参与性研究,旨在捕捉人们日常生活的真实情况。参与式研究(也称为替代研究)的支持者建立在对所谓的“提取式”、自上而下和所谓的实证主义客观实证研究的批判之上。相反,另类研究方法将研究与赋权相结合,并将基于调查的传统研究视为工具性研究。本文首先介绍了替代研究方法的基本前提及其哲学基础。以下部分从Robert Chambers的观点出发,对传统研究方法和替代研究方法进行了比较和对比。此外,社会科学研究在框架逆转、模式逆转、关系逆转和权力逆转方面发生了范式转变。最后一节得出结论,与基于调查的、“客观的”传统研究方法相比,参与式研究在促进知识生成过程、最终增强人民力量方面更为优越。《杜拉吉里社会学与人类学杂志》2017年第11卷;115-129
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Participatory Research and Empowerment: A Conceptual Revisit of the Debate on Alternative Social Science Research
After the 1970s, there has been a growing emphasis on participatory research aimed at capturing people’s lived realities of everyday lives. The proponents of participatory research (also called alternative research) build on a critique of what is called “extractive,” top-down, and so-called objective empirical research of positivist kind. In contrast, alternative research method embeds research with empowerment and regards survey based conventional research as instrumental. This paper first introduces basic premises of alternative research method together with its philosophical underpinning. Drawing arguments from Robert Chambers the following section compares and contrasts the conventional and alternative research methods. Further, a paradigm shift in social science research in terms of reversals of frame, reversals of modes, reversal of relation and reversal of power is dealt. The final section draws a conclusion that compared to survey based, “objective,” conventional research method, participatory researches are superior in facilitating knowledge generation process, eventually empowering the people.Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Vol.11, 2017; 115-129
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Payment and Motivation: Female Community Health Volunteers in Nepal Sampling and Trustworthiness Issues in Qualitative Research Interview with Professor Dilli Ram Dahal Ecological Implications of Local Curriculum: Lessons Learned from a Participatory Action Research Project in a School in Nepal Indigenous Rodhi Culture of Gurung and Factors of its Transform at Ghandruk Kaski in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1