布谷鸟康斯坦西?天堂复活与《共同祈祷书》辩论

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 POETRY Milton Studies Pub Date : 2019-03-13 DOI:10.1353/MLT.2019.0005
R. Zhang
{"title":"布谷鸟康斯坦西?天堂复活与《共同祈祷书》辩论","authors":"R. Zhang","doi":"10.1353/MLT.2019.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:John Milton's Paradise Regained is typically contextualized within the politics of the Restoration; this article, however, argues that his 1671 poem recapitulates his antiliturgical arguments of the 1640s. Juxtaposing Milton's antiliturgical pamphlets, Eikon Basilike, and Eikonoklastes, I show the common interest in the language of \"constancy\" amid the debate over the use of the Book of Common Prayer. This language resurfaces in Paradise Regained, where the \"constant\" Son belatedly counters Eikon's cooption of constancy in the prayer book debates. The Son's famously interior, inward understanding of faith—expressed as neostoic \"constancy\"—rebuts arguments for the use of external forms of liturgy, rehearsing language and imagery from Milton's 1640s prose. Milton consequently emerges as a figure both retrograde and innovative, using old arguments and royalists' own terms in an unprecedented generic context to assert his defiance against the restoration of the English liturgy.","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"61 1","pages":"111 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2019.0005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cuckoo Constancy? Paradise Regained and the Book of Common Prayer Debates\",\"authors\":\"R. Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/MLT.2019.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:John Milton's Paradise Regained is typically contextualized within the politics of the Restoration; this article, however, argues that his 1671 poem recapitulates his antiliturgical arguments of the 1640s. Juxtaposing Milton's antiliturgical pamphlets, Eikon Basilike, and Eikonoklastes, I show the common interest in the language of \\\"constancy\\\" amid the debate over the use of the Book of Common Prayer. This language resurfaces in Paradise Regained, where the \\\"constant\\\" Son belatedly counters Eikon's cooption of constancy in the prayer book debates. The Son's famously interior, inward understanding of faith—expressed as neostoic \\\"constancy\\\"—rebuts arguments for the use of external forms of liturgy, rehearsing language and imagery from Milton's 1640s prose. Milton consequently emerges as a figure both retrograde and innovative, using old arguments and royalists' own terms in an unprecedented generic context to assert his defiance against the restoration of the English liturgy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milton Studies\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"111 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2019.0005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milton Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2019.0005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2019.0005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:约翰·米尔顿的《重获天堂》是典型的复辟政治语境;然而,这篇文章认为,他1671年的诗重述了他在1640年代的反礼拜论。在关于《共同祈祷书》使用的争论中,我列举了米尔顿的反礼拜小册子《艾肯·巴西利克》和《艾肯诺克拉斯特》,展示了人们对“恒常”语言的共同兴趣。这种语言在《天堂重生》中重新出现,在那里,“不变”的儿子姗姗来迟地反驳了艾康在祈祷书辩论中对不变的坚持。圣子对信仰的内在理解——表现为新斯多葛主义的“恒常”——反驳了使用外在形式的礼拜仪式的论点,排练了米尔顿1640年代散文中的语言和意象。因此,米尔顿成为了一个既倒退又创新的人物,他在一个前所未有的通用背景下使用古老的论点和保皇党人自己的术语来表达他对恢复英国礼拜仪式的蔑视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cuckoo Constancy? Paradise Regained and the Book of Common Prayer Debates
abstract:John Milton's Paradise Regained is typically contextualized within the politics of the Restoration; this article, however, argues that his 1671 poem recapitulates his antiliturgical arguments of the 1640s. Juxtaposing Milton's antiliturgical pamphlets, Eikon Basilike, and Eikonoklastes, I show the common interest in the language of "constancy" amid the debate over the use of the Book of Common Prayer. This language resurfaces in Paradise Regained, where the "constant" Son belatedly counters Eikon's cooption of constancy in the prayer book debates. The Son's famously interior, inward understanding of faith—expressed as neostoic "constancy"—rebuts arguments for the use of external forms of liturgy, rehearsing language and imagery from Milton's 1640s prose. Milton consequently emerges as a figure both retrograde and innovative, using old arguments and royalists' own terms in an unprecedented generic context to assert his defiance against the restoration of the English liturgy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
期刊最新文献
"To All Baptized": The Watery Dissent of Paradise Regained Milton's Second Marriage, the Burials of a Wife and Daughter, and Records from Two Parish Chests Milton and the Uses of Stupidity Milton after Auschwitz “Through a Glass, Darkly”: Paradise Lost and Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1