拆除伦敦格勒:肮脏金钱的黑暗地理

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES European Planning Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI:10.1080/09654313.2023.2221283
K. Morgan, Nadir Kinossian
{"title":"拆除伦敦格勒:肮脏金钱的黑暗地理","authors":"K. Morgan, Nadir Kinossian","doi":"10.1080/09654313.2023.2221283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Londongrad is at once a place, a process and a paradox. As a place , it refers to the manifold ways in which London has acquired a reputation for being a safe harbour for dirty money largely on account of a secure system of property rights, a cluster of professional enablers and a neoliberal politics that actively cultivated it. As a process , it illustrates the premier role that London plays in the global system of secrecy jurisdictions. As a paradox it signals the bizarre alignment of two nominally opposed systems, authoritarian state capitalism in Russia and neoliberal capitalism in the UK. Before the war in Ukraine, it was tacitly assumed that Londongrad was impervious to reform because no single political jurisdiction had the reach or the remit to confront this baroque system. Dismantling Londongrad is therefore a belated attempt to regulate the dark geography of dirty money.","PeriodicalId":48292,"journal":{"name":"European Planning Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dismantling Londongrad: the dark geography of dirty money\",\"authors\":\"K. Morgan, Nadir Kinossian\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09654313.2023.2221283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Londongrad is at once a place, a process and a paradox. As a place , it refers to the manifold ways in which London has acquired a reputation for being a safe harbour for dirty money largely on account of a secure system of property rights, a cluster of professional enablers and a neoliberal politics that actively cultivated it. As a process , it illustrates the premier role that London plays in the global system of secrecy jurisdictions. As a paradox it signals the bizarre alignment of two nominally opposed systems, authoritarian state capitalism in Russia and neoliberal capitalism in the UK. Before the war in Ukraine, it was tacitly assumed that Londongrad was impervious to reform because no single political jurisdiction had the reach or the remit to confront this baroque system. Dismantling Londongrad is therefore a belated attempt to regulate the dark geography of dirty money.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Planning Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Planning Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2221283\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Planning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2221283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

隆东格勒既是一个地方,又是一个过程和一个悖论。作为一个地方,它指的是伦敦以多种方式获得了脏钱安全港的声誉,这主要是因为有一个安全的产权体系、一批专业推动者和积极培育它的新自由主义政治。作为一个过程,它表明了伦敦在全球保密管辖体系中发挥的首要作用。作为一个悖论,它标志着两种名义上对立的制度——俄罗斯的威权国家资本主义和英国的新自由主义资本主义——的奇怪结盟。在乌克兰战争之前,人们默认伦敦格勒不受改革的影响,因为没有一个单一的政治管辖权能够对抗这种巴洛克制度。因此,拆除伦敦格勒是一次姗姗来迟的尝试,目的是规范肮脏金钱的黑暗地理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dismantling Londongrad: the dark geography of dirty money
Londongrad is at once a place, a process and a paradox. As a place , it refers to the manifold ways in which London has acquired a reputation for being a safe harbour for dirty money largely on account of a secure system of property rights, a cluster of professional enablers and a neoliberal politics that actively cultivated it. As a process , it illustrates the premier role that London plays in the global system of secrecy jurisdictions. As a paradox it signals the bizarre alignment of two nominally opposed systems, authoritarian state capitalism in Russia and neoliberal capitalism in the UK. Before the war in Ukraine, it was tacitly assumed that Londongrad was impervious to reform because no single political jurisdiction had the reach or the remit to confront this baroque system. Dismantling Londongrad is therefore a belated attempt to regulate the dark geography of dirty money.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: European Planning Studies provides a forum for ideas and information about spatial development processes and policies in Europe. The journal publishes articles of a theoretical, empirical and policy-relevant nature and is particularly concerned to integrate knowledge of processes with practical policy proposals, implementation and evaluation. Articles of particular interest to the journal focus upon specific spatial development problems, as well as emerging explanations of new urban, regional, national or supranational developmental tendencies. Country-specific, region-specific or locality-specific issues are focused upon, although comparative analysis is of especial value.
期刊最新文献
Environmental acceptability of suburban sprawl around two differently sized Czech cities New collaborations and novel innovations: the role of regional brokerage and collaboration intensity Privatisations, FDI, and Greece’s regional economic recovery: an empirical study of perceptual view of investors Conceptualizing ‘green’ in urban and regional planning – the cases of Oslo and Helsinki What are the driving factors for implementing participatory budgeting? A case study from Czechia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1