{"title":"新冠肺炎时期的重新瞄准","authors":"Alexandra Kaasch","doi":"10.1177/14680181221120871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46041,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Policy","volume":"22 1","pages":"423-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-discussing targeting in times of Covid-19.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Kaasch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14680181221120871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":46041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Social Policy\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"423-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181221120871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181221120871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
首先,我想谈谈本期论坛的主题:目标定位。我们是在回顾过去的话语吗?远非如此!世界银行(Grosh et al., 2022)刚刚发布了一份题为《重新审视社会援助的目标:对旧困境的新看法》的新报告。在本期的论坛部分,该报告的作者展示了该报告的主要发现和论点。国际劳工组织(ILO)的一个团队Razavi等人对此进行了批判性的讨论。讨论由本刊部分编辑撰写的引言展开和框架,两篇论坛文章显示了社会保护目标的不同内涵和视角。尽管没有明确的和有目的的,本期的一些文章挑战了关于间接目标的争论中的某些核心论点,或者增加了它的复杂性。这些问题涉及k兹勒尔关于中非的文章,除其他外,涉及现金转移的限制;绿色与杨对东亚发展主义的批判布鲁泽利乌斯和舒特斯主张在社会政策研究中纳入流动性的概念。k兹勒关注的是一组以专制政权为特征的非洲国家(中非)。通过配对比较,他试图确定这些国家提供社会服务的模式。与目标相关的一个有趣的方面是,k兹勒发现,将地区精英纳入社会服务(因此不只是关注人口中的贫困和弱势群体)的地区国家表现得更好——为什么?精英们更愿意在政治上支持这些计划,如果它们也对自己有利的话。与此同时,正如作者所表明的,社会政策并没有作为重要的选举问题出现。在东亚“发展主义”福利国家这一完全不同的国家群体中,更绿和杨关注的是生育、纪律和不平等,新加坡的中央公积金制度就是例证。该基金在住房、保健、教育和退休等社会保障方面采用"强制储蓄"办法。资格标准与与异性恋家庭相关的“期望社会行为”有关
期刊介绍:
Global Social Policy is a fully peer-reviewed journal that advances the understanding of the impact of globalisation processes upon social policy and social development on the one hand, and the impact of social policy upon globalisation processes on the other hand. The journal analyses the contributions of a range of national and international actors, both governmental and non-governmental, to global social policy and social development discourse and practice. Global Social Policy publishes scholarly policy-oriented articles and reports that focus on aspects of social policy and social and human development as broadly defined in the context of globalisation be it in contemporary or historical contexts.