立陶宛登记少年犯罪表现和趋势的国际比较

Gintautas Sakalauskas, V. Kalpokas, Jolita Buzaitytė-Kašalynienė, Birutė Švedaitė-Sakalauskė
{"title":"立陶宛登记少年犯罪表现和趋势的国际比较","authors":"Gintautas Sakalauskas, V. Kalpokas, Jolita Buzaitytė-Kašalynienė, Birutė Švedaitė-Sakalauskė","doi":"10.15388/crimlithuan.2021.9.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article manifestations of registered juvenile delinquency, its‘ structure and tendencies in Lithuania are analyzed, Lithuanian indicators are also compared with the indicators of other European countries. The comparative study shows large differences in registered juvenile delinquency, which are primarily determined by different scopes of criminalization of delinquency, different intensity of formal control, as well as different rules for registering juvenile delinquency. The absolute indicators of registered juvenile criminal offences in Lithuania have been decreasing for the past two decades, and the relative indicators of registered juvenile criminal behavior have also been consistently decreasing for the last five years. 2020–2021 the number of administrative offenses committed by minors in Lithuania also decreased, which is primarily associated with restrictions in public life introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Serious violent crimes by minors, characterized by low latency, are often widely described in the media, and constitute a small part of the structure of crimes committed by minors in Lithuania, and the number of murders is consistently decreasing – in 2021 it was the smallest during the entire period of independent Lithuania – only one murder was registered. After completing this study, it can be said that the indicators of registered juvenile delinquency compared to other countries should be seen first of all as an output of the juvenile behavior control mechanisms operating in each country, which tells little about the real extent of juvenile delinquency. The minor juvenile delinquency is more latent and its rates should be first evaluated. Cases of serious delinquency are characterized by a much lower latency, but in this case too, in order to compare registered delinquency, it is necessary to simultaneously assess complex differences in criminal prosecution between countries.","PeriodicalId":52861,"journal":{"name":"Kriminologijos studijos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International comparison of manifestations and tendencies of registered juvenile delinquency in Lithuania\",\"authors\":\"Gintautas Sakalauskas, V. Kalpokas, Jolita Buzaitytė-Kašalynienė, Birutė Švedaitė-Sakalauskė\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/crimlithuan.2021.9.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article manifestations of registered juvenile delinquency, its‘ structure and tendencies in Lithuania are analyzed, Lithuanian indicators are also compared with the indicators of other European countries. The comparative study shows large differences in registered juvenile delinquency, which are primarily determined by different scopes of criminalization of delinquency, different intensity of formal control, as well as different rules for registering juvenile delinquency. The absolute indicators of registered juvenile criminal offences in Lithuania have been decreasing for the past two decades, and the relative indicators of registered juvenile criminal behavior have also been consistently decreasing for the last five years. 2020–2021 the number of administrative offenses committed by minors in Lithuania also decreased, which is primarily associated with restrictions in public life introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Serious violent crimes by minors, characterized by low latency, are often widely described in the media, and constitute a small part of the structure of crimes committed by minors in Lithuania, and the number of murders is consistently decreasing – in 2021 it was the smallest during the entire period of independent Lithuania – only one murder was registered. After completing this study, it can be said that the indicators of registered juvenile delinquency compared to other countries should be seen first of all as an output of the juvenile behavior control mechanisms operating in each country, which tells little about the real extent of juvenile delinquency. The minor juvenile delinquency is more latent and its rates should be first evaluated. Cases of serious delinquency are characterized by a much lower latency, but in this case too, in order to compare registered delinquency, it is necessary to simultaneously assess complex differences in criminal prosecution between countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kriminologijos studijos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kriminologijos studijos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/crimlithuan.2021.9.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kriminologijos studijos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/crimlithuan.2021.9.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了立陶宛在册少年犯罪的表现、结构和趋势,并将立陶宛的指标与欧洲其他国家的指标进行了比较。对比研究表明,我国未成年人犯罪登记存在较大差异,这主要是由犯罪定罪范围的不同、形式管制力度的不同以及未成年人犯罪登记制度的不同所决定的。立陶宛登记在案的少年犯罪的绝对指标在过去二十年中一直在下降,登记在案的少年犯罪行为的相对指标在过去五年中也一直在下降。2020-2021年,立陶宛未成年人犯下的行政犯罪数量也有所下降,这主要与2019冠状病毒病大流行对公共生活实施的限制有关。未成年人的严重暴力犯罪具有低潜伏期的特点,经常在媒体上被广泛描述,并且构成立陶宛未成年人犯罪结构的一小部分,谋杀数量不断减少- 2021年是立陶宛独立期间最小的-只有一起谋杀被登记。在完成本研究后,可以说,与其他国家相比,登记在案的青少年犯罪指标首先应该被视为每个国家运行的青少年行为控制机制的输出,它几乎不能说明青少年犯罪的真实程度。未成年人犯罪具有较强的潜在性,应首先对其犯罪率进行评估。严重犯罪案件的特点是延迟时间要短得多,但在这种情况下,为了比较已登记的犯罪,有必要同时评估各国在刑事起诉方面的复杂差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International comparison of manifestations and tendencies of registered juvenile delinquency in Lithuania
In the article manifestations of registered juvenile delinquency, its‘ structure and tendencies in Lithuania are analyzed, Lithuanian indicators are also compared with the indicators of other European countries. The comparative study shows large differences in registered juvenile delinquency, which are primarily determined by different scopes of criminalization of delinquency, different intensity of formal control, as well as different rules for registering juvenile delinquency. The absolute indicators of registered juvenile criminal offences in Lithuania have been decreasing for the past two decades, and the relative indicators of registered juvenile criminal behavior have also been consistently decreasing for the last five years. 2020–2021 the number of administrative offenses committed by minors in Lithuania also decreased, which is primarily associated with restrictions in public life introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Serious violent crimes by minors, characterized by low latency, are often widely described in the media, and constitute a small part of the structure of crimes committed by minors in Lithuania, and the number of murders is consistently decreasing – in 2021 it was the smallest during the entire period of independent Lithuania – only one murder was registered. After completing this study, it can be said that the indicators of registered juvenile delinquency compared to other countries should be seen first of all as an output of the juvenile behavior control mechanisms operating in each country, which tells little about the real extent of juvenile delinquency. The minor juvenile delinquency is more latent and its rates should be first evaluated. Cases of serious delinquency are characterized by a much lower latency, but in this case too, in order to compare registered delinquency, it is necessary to simultaneously assess complex differences in criminal prosecution between countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Manipulation of sports competitions in the Lithuanian football: empirical research Peculiarities of consolidation of criminal penalties and the justice of the final sentence in the practice of Lithuanian courts Managing the risk of repeated violence against the intimate partner in probation service: Review of the practice in Lithuania and foreign countries Sexual harassment and abuse in sport: some legal and criminological considerations Certain Relevant Issues of Interviewing Minors and Victims in the Practice of Law Enforcement Institutions During Criminal Proceedings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1