筛选除草剂和除草剂混合物以确定抗性车前草生物型的替代化学控制

Vhuthu Ndou, E. Phiri, P. Pieterse
{"title":"筛选除草剂和除草剂混合物以确定抗性车前草生物型的替代化学控制","authors":"Vhuthu Ndou, E. Phiri, P. Pieterse","doi":"10.1080/02571862.2022.2068084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herbicide mixtures are beneficial since they delay the occurrence of resistance to herbicides, provided that the herbicides used are effective at controlling the target weed species. Recently, plantago (Plantago lanceolata L.) was found to show 23 and 10-fold-resistance to glyphosate and paraquat. Experiments were carried out under controlled conditions to determine the efficacy of various herbicide concentrations and mixtures for the control of multiple resistant plantago at the two to three leaf stage. Proven plantago resistant (R) biotypes which had been shown to survive high glyphosate and paraquat dosages were used together with one susceptible (S) biotype in each experiment. The herbicides 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), (400 g a.i. ha−1), carfentrazone-ethyl (400 g a.i. ha−1), and glufosinate (200 g a.i. ha−1), and two combined mixtures consisting of paraquat + diquat (120 + 80 g a.i. ha−1), and terbuthylazine + S-metolachlor (497.2 + 102.8 g a.i. ha−1) were applied either alone or in mixtures resulting in 12 treatments. The herbicides and combinations were chosen for their distinct modes of action. The mixtures achieved 0% survival rates for the R and S biotypes except for glyphosate + MCPA and MCPA applied alone. The herbicide mixtures identified in the study together with other non-chemical control options may be used in the management of glyphosate- and paraquat-resistant plantago infestations.","PeriodicalId":21920,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening herbicides and herbicide mixtures to identify alternative chemical controls for resistant plantago biotypes\",\"authors\":\"Vhuthu Ndou, E. Phiri, P. Pieterse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02571862.2022.2068084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Herbicide mixtures are beneficial since they delay the occurrence of resistance to herbicides, provided that the herbicides used are effective at controlling the target weed species. Recently, plantago (Plantago lanceolata L.) was found to show 23 and 10-fold-resistance to glyphosate and paraquat. Experiments were carried out under controlled conditions to determine the efficacy of various herbicide concentrations and mixtures for the control of multiple resistant plantago at the two to three leaf stage. Proven plantago resistant (R) biotypes which had been shown to survive high glyphosate and paraquat dosages were used together with one susceptible (S) biotype in each experiment. The herbicides 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), (400 g a.i. ha−1), carfentrazone-ethyl (400 g a.i. ha−1), and glufosinate (200 g a.i. ha−1), and two combined mixtures consisting of paraquat + diquat (120 + 80 g a.i. ha−1), and terbuthylazine + S-metolachlor (497.2 + 102.8 g a.i. ha−1) were applied either alone or in mixtures resulting in 12 treatments. The herbicides and combinations were chosen for their distinct modes of action. The mixtures achieved 0% survival rates for the R and S biotypes except for glyphosate + MCPA and MCPA applied alone. The herbicide mixtures identified in the study together with other non-chemical control options may be used in the management of glyphosate- and paraquat-resistant plantago infestations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2022.2068084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2022.2068084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

除草剂混合物是有益的,因为它们延缓了对除草剂产生抗性的发生,只要所使用的除草剂能有效地控制目标杂草种类。最近发现车前草(plantago lanceolata L.)对草甘膦和百草枯的抗性分别为23倍和10倍。在一定条件下进行了不同除草剂浓度和混合药剂对车前草二、三叶期多重抗性的防治效果试验。已证实的车前草抗性(R)生物型在高草甘膦和百草枯剂量下存活,在每个实验中与一种敏感(S)生物型一起使用。除草剂2-甲基-4-氯苯氧乙酸(MCPA) (400 g a.i. ha−1)、卡芬曲酮-乙基(400 g a.i. ha−1)和草铵膦(200 g a.i. ha−1),以及由百草枯+双甘菊(120 + 80 g a.i. ha−1)和特丁基嗪+ s -甲草胺(497.2 + 102.8 g a.i. ha−1)组成的两种组合混合物单独或混合施用,共12次处理。所选择的除草剂和组合是根据其不同的作用方式选择的。除草甘膦+ MCPA和单独使用MCPA外,R和S生物型的混合物存活率均为0%。研究中确定的混合除草剂与其他非化学控制方法可用于管理抗草甘膦和百草枯的车前草虫害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screening herbicides and herbicide mixtures to identify alternative chemical controls for resistant plantago biotypes
Herbicide mixtures are beneficial since they delay the occurrence of resistance to herbicides, provided that the herbicides used are effective at controlling the target weed species. Recently, plantago (Plantago lanceolata L.) was found to show 23 and 10-fold-resistance to glyphosate and paraquat. Experiments were carried out under controlled conditions to determine the efficacy of various herbicide concentrations and mixtures for the control of multiple resistant plantago at the two to three leaf stage. Proven plantago resistant (R) biotypes which had been shown to survive high glyphosate and paraquat dosages were used together with one susceptible (S) biotype in each experiment. The herbicides 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), (400 g a.i. ha−1), carfentrazone-ethyl (400 g a.i. ha−1), and glufosinate (200 g a.i. ha−1), and two combined mixtures consisting of paraquat + diquat (120 + 80 g a.i. ha−1), and terbuthylazine + S-metolachlor (497.2 + 102.8 g a.i. ha−1) were applied either alone or in mixtures resulting in 12 treatments. The herbicides and combinations were chosen for their distinct modes of action. The mixtures achieved 0% survival rates for the R and S biotypes except for glyphosate + MCPA and MCPA applied alone. The herbicide mixtures identified in the study together with other non-chemical control options may be used in the management of glyphosate- and paraquat-resistant plantago infestations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Plant and Soil
South African Journal of Plant and Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal has a proud history of publishing quality papers in the fields of applied plant and soil sciences and has, since its inception, recorded a vast body of scientific information with particular reference to South Africa.
期刊最新文献
The impact of planting dates and hybrid selection on sunflower seed yield and oil content Comparison of the effectiveness of mined and by-product South African gypsums and other calcium sources for soil sodicity remediation Nutrient uptake and yield response of wheat ( Triticum spp.) to different fertiliser applications in Ethiopia Transpiration efficiency of lucerne under unlimited soil water conditions during the first growing season Digital soil mapping enables informed decision-making to conserve soils within protected areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1