超声造影在血管内动脉瘤修复术后内漏监测中的应用

Shirley Cho, Sookyung Kwon, D. Jung, S. C. Park, Hyangkyoung Kim, J. Kim, S. Yun
{"title":"超声造影在血管内动脉瘤修复术后内漏监测中的应用","authors":"Shirley Cho, Sookyung Kwon, D. Jung, S. C. Park, Hyangkyoung Kim, J. Kim, S. Yun","doi":"10.46268/JSU.2019.6.2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a minimally invasive alternative to open repair for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Yet the follow-up after EVAR with lifelong post-interventional imaging is mandatory in order to detect complications such as endoleaks or stent migration. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is considered the standard imaging modality and widely used for follow-up, although patients are exposed to both radiation and nephrotoxic contrast medium. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for detecting post EVAR endoleaks compared with that of CTA, which is considered as the gold standard. Methods: From January 2010 to August 2019, 27 patients who underwent CEUS and CTA for follow-up after elective EVAR at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The presence of endoleak was compared between CTA and CEUS. Results: The 27 paired CTA and CEUS studies were analyzed. Eleven patients had endoleak detected on CEUS and they had the same findings with CTA. One patient had endoleak detected on CEUS, but this was not detected on CTA. Three patients didn’t have endoleak detected on CEUS, but endoleak was detected on CTA. 13 patients had no endoleak detected on CEUS or CTA. Assuming CTA is the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS to detect endoleak were 92.3%, and 78.6% respectively. Conclusion: CEUS can be used as a viable and feasible imaging alternative for the follow-up and the detection of endoleak after EVAR with the additional benefit of being a real-time non-ionizing radiation examination.","PeriodicalId":33937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endoleak after Endo-vascular Aneurysm Repair\",\"authors\":\"Shirley Cho, Sookyung Kwon, D. Jung, S. C. Park, Hyangkyoung Kim, J. Kim, S. Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.46268/JSU.2019.6.2.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a minimally invasive alternative to open repair for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Yet the follow-up after EVAR with lifelong post-interventional imaging is mandatory in order to detect complications such as endoleaks or stent migration. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is considered the standard imaging modality and widely used for follow-up, although patients are exposed to both radiation and nephrotoxic contrast medium. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for detecting post EVAR endoleaks compared with that of CTA, which is considered as the gold standard. Methods: From January 2010 to August 2019, 27 patients who underwent CEUS and CTA for follow-up after elective EVAR at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The presence of endoleak was compared between CTA and CEUS. Results: The 27 paired CTA and CEUS studies were analyzed. Eleven patients had endoleak detected on CEUS and they had the same findings with CTA. One patient had endoleak detected on CEUS, but this was not detected on CTA. Three patients didn’t have endoleak detected on CEUS, but endoleak was detected on CTA. 13 patients had no endoleak detected on CEUS or CTA. Assuming CTA is the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS to detect endoleak were 92.3%, and 78.6% respectively. Conclusion: CEUS can be used as a viable and feasible imaging alternative for the follow-up and the detection of endoleak after EVAR with the additional benefit of being a real-time non-ionizing radiation examination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46268/JSU.2019.6.2.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46268/JSU.2019.6.2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)是腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者开放性修复的微创替代方案。然而,为了检测内漏或支架移位等并发症,必须在EVAR后进行终身介入后成像随访。计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CTA)被认为是标准的成像方式,并被广泛用于随访,尽管患者同时暴露于辐射和肾毒性造影剂中。本研究的目的是确定对比增强超声(CEUS)与CTA(被认为是金标准)相比,在检测EVAR后内漏方面的诊断效果。方法:对2010年1月至2019年8月在一个中心接受选择性EVAR后CEUS和CTA随访的27例患者进行回顾性分析。比较CTA和CEUS之间是否存在内漏。结果:对27例CTA和CEUS配对研究进行了分析。11名患者在CEUS上检测到内漏,他们在CTA上也有相同的发现。一名患者在CEUS上检测到内漏,但在CTA上未检测到。三名患者在CEUS上没有检测到内漏,但在CTA上检测到了内漏。13例患者在CEUS或CTA上未检测到内漏。假设CTA是金标准,CEUS检测内漏的敏感性和特异性分别为92.3%和78.6%。结论:CEUS可作为一种可行的影像学替代方案,用于EVAR后的随访和内漏检测,同时作为一种实时非电离辐射检查具有额外的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endoleak after Endo-vascular Aneurysm Repair
Purpose: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a minimally invasive alternative to open repair for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Yet the follow-up after EVAR with lifelong post-interventional imaging is mandatory in order to detect complications such as endoleaks or stent migration. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is considered the standard imaging modality and widely used for follow-up, although patients are exposed to both radiation and nephrotoxic contrast medium. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for detecting post EVAR endoleaks compared with that of CTA, which is considered as the gold standard. Methods: From January 2010 to August 2019, 27 patients who underwent CEUS and CTA for follow-up after elective EVAR at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The presence of endoleak was compared between CTA and CEUS. Results: The 27 paired CTA and CEUS studies were analyzed. Eleven patients had endoleak detected on CEUS and they had the same findings with CTA. One patient had endoleak detected on CEUS, but this was not detected on CTA. Three patients didn’t have endoleak detected on CEUS, but endoleak was detected on CTA. 13 patients had no endoleak detected on CEUS or CTA. Assuming CTA is the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS to detect endoleak were 92.3%, and 78.6% respectively. Conclusion: CEUS can be used as a viable and feasible imaging alternative for the follow-up and the detection of endoleak after EVAR with the additional benefit of being a real-time non-ionizing radiation examination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Leg Ulcers Accompanied by Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Lymphedema Caused by IgG4-Related Disease Ultrasound Risk Stratification System of Thyroid Nodule Effects of Ultrasound Targeted Destruction of Echogenic Nanobubbles Containing Doxorubicin in Rat Liver Correlation of Resistive Index Values Using Spectral Doppler Ultrasound with Histopathological Results in Breast Tumors Diagnostic Utility of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1