这是小事:国际干预者在国际和平架构的社会(重建)建设中的作用

IF 1.7 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Society Pub Date : 2021-06-19 DOI:10.1080/13600826.2021.1942798
Joanne Wallis
{"title":"这是小事:国际干预者在国际和平架构的社会(重建)建设中的作用","authors":"Joanne Wallis","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2021.1942798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Much peace and conflict scholarship groups individual international interveners together as ‘the international’, treating them more as an ideational structure – the international peace architecture – than as individual agents. This article brings foreign policy analysis scholarship into conversation with constructivist scholarship to propose analytical questions that can be used to study the role that individual international interveners play in socially constructing the international peace architecture. It proposes questions at both the micro scale of individual international interveners and the meso scale of the international peace architecture, that is, the organisations that make peacebuilding policy and practice peacebuilding work. Analysis guided by these questions could inform future considerations of what peacebuilding means, who is a suitable candidate for performing peacebuilding work, the way that peacebuilding is practiced, and ultimately on the security of the conflict-affected populations in which peacebuilding interventions are conducted.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"35 1","pages":"456 - 478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1942798","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It’s the Little Things: The Role of International Interveners in the Social (re)Construction of the International Peace Architecture\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Wallis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13600826.2021.1942798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Much peace and conflict scholarship groups individual international interveners together as ‘the international’, treating them more as an ideational structure – the international peace architecture – than as individual agents. This article brings foreign policy analysis scholarship into conversation with constructivist scholarship to propose analytical questions that can be used to study the role that individual international interveners play in socially constructing the international peace architecture. It proposes questions at both the micro scale of individual international interveners and the meso scale of the international peace architecture, that is, the organisations that make peacebuilding policy and practice peacebuilding work. Analysis guided by these questions could inform future considerations of what peacebuilding means, who is a suitable candidate for performing peacebuilding work, the way that peacebuilding is practiced, and ultimately on the security of the conflict-affected populations in which peacebuilding interventions are conducted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Society\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"456 - 478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600826.2021.1942798\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1942798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1942798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要许多和平与冲突学术将各个国际干预者归为“国际”,将他们更多地视为一种概念结构——国际和平架构——而不是个人代理人。本文将外交政策分析学术与建构主义学术相结合,提出了一些分析问题,可以用来研究国际干预者在社会构建国际和平架构中所扮演的角色。它提出了国际干预者个人微观层面和国际和平架构微观层面的问题,即制定建设和平政策和实践建设和平工作的组织。以这些问题为指导的分析可以为未来的考虑提供信息,包括建设和平意味着什么,谁是开展建设和平工作的合适人选,建设和平的实施方式,以及最终进行建设和平干预的受冲突影响人口的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
It’s the Little Things: The Role of International Interveners in the Social (re)Construction of the International Peace Architecture
ABSTRACT Much peace and conflict scholarship groups individual international interveners together as ‘the international’, treating them more as an ideational structure – the international peace architecture – than as individual agents. This article brings foreign policy analysis scholarship into conversation with constructivist scholarship to propose analytical questions that can be used to study the role that individual international interveners play in socially constructing the international peace architecture. It proposes questions at both the micro scale of individual international interveners and the meso scale of the international peace architecture, that is, the organisations that make peacebuilding policy and practice peacebuilding work. Analysis guided by these questions could inform future considerations of what peacebuilding means, who is a suitable candidate for performing peacebuilding work, the way that peacebuilding is practiced, and ultimately on the security of the conflict-affected populations in which peacebuilding interventions are conducted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Society
Global Society INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Global Society covers the new agenda in global and international relations and encourages innovative approaches to the study of global and international issues from a range of disciplines. It promotes the analysis of transactions at multiple levels, and in particular, the way in which these transactions blur the distinction between the sub-national, national, transnational, international and global levels. An ever integrating global society raises a number of issues for global and international relations which do not fit comfortably within established "Paradigms" Among these are the international and global consequences of nationalism and struggles for identity, migration, racism, religious fundamentalism, terrorism and criminal activities.
期刊最新文献
Passivity as Resistance: Counter-Conduct in Japan and Cambodia Counter-Conducts: A Foucauldian Analytics of Popup Civic Actions in Mexico Authoritarianism, Governmentality and the COVID-19 Response Re-thinking Global Governance as Fuzzy: Multi-Scalar Boundaries of Responsibility in the Arctic Multilateralism at War: Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine, the G20 and World Order
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1