垃圾场的食物供应如何影响牛白鹭繁殖成功和后代死亡率?

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Avian Biology Research Pub Date : 2021-12-24 DOI:10.1177/17581559211066090
Rachida Gherbi-Salmi, A. Bachir, C. Ghazi, S. Doumandji
{"title":"垃圾场的食物供应如何影响牛白鹭繁殖成功和后代死亡率?","authors":"Rachida Gherbi-Salmi, A. Bachir, C. Ghazi, S. Doumandji","doi":"10.1177/17581559211066090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of food supply in garbage dumps on the reproductive fitness of Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis and offspring losses. A total of 236 nests were monitored during two distinct periods of 2 years for each: 146 nests during a period without food supply in dumps (1998–1999) and 90 with food supply in dumps (2007–2008). The study was carried out in the colony of El-Kseur in the Lower Soummam Valley (northeast Algeria). For the entire study period, the mean of clutch size, average number of hatched chicks, productivity, and breeding success varied significantly between years (Kruskal–Wallis test: p < .05). Also, the average calculated losses for eggs, chicks, and total offspring vary significantly (Chi2 test: p > .0001). The clutch size and the number of hatched chicks per nest were highest during the period with food supply in garbage dump (respectively: 3.46 ± 0.86; 2.85 ± 1.11), compared to the period when cattle egrets feed in natural or agricultural habitats (3.04 ± 0.87; 2.54 ± 1.03). However, productivity and breeding success were highest during the period without food supply (respectively: 2.11 ± 1.16 fledging’s/nest; 0.70 ± 0.35) than in the period with food supply (1.14 ± 0.91; 0.35 ± 0.30). While egg losses were substantially similar between the two study periods, chick’s mortality (59.9%) and total offspring losses (36.7%) were higher during the period with food supply. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis indicated a large negative effect of food supply in dumps on the productivity, on the chick’s losses; and a positive effect on the total offspring losses (p < .001). Also, feed in dump garbage revealed a significant negative effect on the breeding success linear mixed model (LMM, p = .01). However, no significant effects (GLMM, p > .05) of food supply in dumps were noted on average clutch size, the mean number of hatched chicks per nest, and egg losses.","PeriodicalId":55408,"journal":{"name":"Avian Biology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"47 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How food supply in rubbish dumps affects the breeding success and offspring mortality of cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis?\",\"authors\":\"Rachida Gherbi-Salmi, A. Bachir, C. Ghazi, S. Doumandji\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17581559211066090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of food supply in garbage dumps on the reproductive fitness of Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis and offspring losses. A total of 236 nests were monitored during two distinct periods of 2 years for each: 146 nests during a period without food supply in dumps (1998–1999) and 90 with food supply in dumps (2007–2008). The study was carried out in the colony of El-Kseur in the Lower Soummam Valley (northeast Algeria). For the entire study period, the mean of clutch size, average number of hatched chicks, productivity, and breeding success varied significantly between years (Kruskal–Wallis test: p < .05). Also, the average calculated losses for eggs, chicks, and total offspring vary significantly (Chi2 test: p > .0001). The clutch size and the number of hatched chicks per nest were highest during the period with food supply in garbage dump (respectively: 3.46 ± 0.86; 2.85 ± 1.11), compared to the period when cattle egrets feed in natural or agricultural habitats (3.04 ± 0.87; 2.54 ± 1.03). However, productivity and breeding success were highest during the period without food supply (respectively: 2.11 ± 1.16 fledging’s/nest; 0.70 ± 0.35) than in the period with food supply (1.14 ± 0.91; 0.35 ± 0.30). While egg losses were substantially similar between the two study periods, chick’s mortality (59.9%) and total offspring losses (36.7%) were higher during the period with food supply. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis indicated a large negative effect of food supply in dumps on the productivity, on the chick’s losses; and a positive effect on the total offspring losses (p < .001). Also, feed in dump garbage revealed a significant negative effect on the breeding success linear mixed model (LMM, p = .01). However, no significant effects (GLMM, p > .05) of food supply in dumps were noted on average clutch size, the mean number of hatched chicks per nest, and egg losses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avian Biology Research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"47 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avian Biology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17581559211066090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Biology Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17581559211066090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是评估垃圾场食物供应对牛白鹭繁殖适应性和后代损失的影响。在两个不同的两年期内,共监测了236个巢穴:146个巢穴在没有食物供应的时期(1998-2009年)和90个有食物供应的巢穴(2007-2008年)。这项研究是在下苏姆山谷(阿尔及利亚东北部)的El Kseur殖民地进行的。在整个研究期间,离合器大小、孵化小鸡的平均数量、生产力和繁殖成功率的平均值在不同年份之间存在显著差异(Kruskal–Wallis检验:p<.05)。此外,鸡蛋、小鸡、,和总后代差异显著(Chi2检验:p>.0001)。与牛白鹭在自然或农业栖息地觅食的时期(3.04±0.87;2.54±1.03)相比,在垃圾场有食物供应的时期,窝大小和每个巢孵化的小鸡数量最高(分别为:3.46±0.86;2.85±1.11)。然而,在没有食物供应的时期,生产力和繁殖成功率最高(分别为:2.11±1.16只雏鸟/窝;0.70±0.35),而在有食物供应的期间(1.14±0.91;0.35±0.30)。虽然两个研究期间的卵子损失基本相似,但在有食物供应的期间,小鸡的死亡率(59.9%)和后代总损失(36.7%)更高。广义线性混合模型(GLMM)分析表明,垃圾场的食物供应对鸡的生产力和损失有很大的负面影响;垃圾堆中的饲料对繁殖成功线性混合模型(LMM,p=0.01)也有显著的负面影响。然而,垃圾堆中食物供应对平均窝数、每窝孵化小鸡的平均数量和蛋损失没有显著影响(GLMM,p>0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How food supply in rubbish dumps affects the breeding success and offspring mortality of cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis?
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of food supply in garbage dumps on the reproductive fitness of Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis and offspring losses. A total of 236 nests were monitored during two distinct periods of 2 years for each: 146 nests during a period without food supply in dumps (1998–1999) and 90 with food supply in dumps (2007–2008). The study was carried out in the colony of El-Kseur in the Lower Soummam Valley (northeast Algeria). For the entire study period, the mean of clutch size, average number of hatched chicks, productivity, and breeding success varied significantly between years (Kruskal–Wallis test: p < .05). Also, the average calculated losses for eggs, chicks, and total offspring vary significantly (Chi2 test: p > .0001). The clutch size and the number of hatched chicks per nest were highest during the period with food supply in garbage dump (respectively: 3.46 ± 0.86; 2.85 ± 1.11), compared to the period when cattle egrets feed in natural or agricultural habitats (3.04 ± 0.87; 2.54 ± 1.03). However, productivity and breeding success were highest during the period without food supply (respectively: 2.11 ± 1.16 fledging’s/nest; 0.70 ± 0.35) than in the period with food supply (1.14 ± 0.91; 0.35 ± 0.30). While egg losses were substantially similar between the two study periods, chick’s mortality (59.9%) and total offspring losses (36.7%) were higher during the period with food supply. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis indicated a large negative effect of food supply in dumps on the productivity, on the chick’s losses; and a positive effect on the total offspring losses (p < .001). Also, feed in dump garbage revealed a significant negative effect on the breeding success linear mixed model (LMM, p = .01). However, no significant effects (GLMM, p > .05) of food supply in dumps were noted on average clutch size, the mean number of hatched chicks per nest, and egg losses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Avian Biology Research
Avian Biology Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Avian Biology Research provides a forum for the publication of research in every field of ornithology. It covers all aspects of pure and applied ornithology for wild or captive species as well as research that does not readily fit within the publication objectives of other ornithological journals. By considering a wide range of research fields for publication, Avian Biology Research provides a forum for people working in every field of ornithology.
期刊最新文献
An acute handling challenge mobilizes glucose and free fatty acids in mountain Dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis oreganus) Sex determination in blue-fronted parrot (Amazona aestiva) using head and radiographic biometry Solar bird banding: Notes on changes in avian behavior while mist-netting during an eclipse Multiple plumage color signals associated with courtship displays may represent body quality in male golden pheasants (Chrysolophus pictus) Seasonal migration directs and facilitates gene flow in the Broad-tailed and Lucifer Sheartail Hummingbirds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1