白色和波兰

Q2 Arts and Humanities Praktyka Teoretyczna Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.19195/prt.2022.1.12
Brian Porter-Szűcs
{"title":"白色和波兰","authors":"Brian Porter-Szűcs","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, the New York Times launched a series of articles entitled “The 1619 Project,” which argued that we should reorient our understanding of American history by using as a starting point the year when the first African slaves were sold in the territory that would become the United States.1 Not surprisingly, Donald Trump immediately countered by sponsoring “The 1776 Project,” which attempts to position the libertarian right as the heir to a long tradition of American greatness.2 A furious battle over historical memory is now being fought around these two texts, with school districts mandating that one or the other be adopted into the curriculum, depending on the political orientation dominating in any particular district.3 This was the backdrop for me when I read Adam Leszczyński’s Ludowa historia Polski (“The People’s History of Poland”), so the book felt familiar even before I noticed the references to Howard Zinn’s (1980) A People’s History of the United States. The country of my birth and the country that I study as a historian are rarely so explicitly aligned. Both","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whiteness and Polishness\",\"authors\":\"Brian Porter-Szűcs\",\"doi\":\"10.19195/prt.2022.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2019, the New York Times launched a series of articles entitled “The 1619 Project,” which argued that we should reorient our understanding of American history by using as a starting point the year when the first African slaves were sold in the territory that would become the United States.1 Not surprisingly, Donald Trump immediately countered by sponsoring “The 1776 Project,” which attempts to position the libertarian right as the heir to a long tradition of American greatness.2 A furious battle over historical memory is now being fought around these two texts, with school districts mandating that one or the other be adopted into the curriculum, depending on the political orientation dominating in any particular district.3 This was the backdrop for me when I read Adam Leszczyński’s Ludowa historia Polski (“The People’s History of Poland”), so the book felt familiar even before I noticed the references to Howard Zinn’s (1980) A People’s History of the United States. The country of my birth and the country that I study as a historian are rarely so explicitly aligned. Both\",\"PeriodicalId\":36093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praktyka Teoretyczna\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praktyka Teoretyczna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年,《纽约时报》发表了一系列题为“1619计划”的文章,认为我们应该重新定位对美国历史的理解,以第一批非洲奴隶在后来成为美国的领土上被贩卖的那一年为起点。1毫不奇怪,唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)立即发起了“1776计划”(The 1776 Project),试图将自由主义右翼定位为美国伟大悠久传统的继承人,这是我读亚当·莱斯钦斯基(Adam Leszczyński)的《波兰人民史》(Ludowa historia Polski)时的背景,所以这本书在我注意到霍华德·津恩(Howard Zinn)(1980)的《美国人民史》之前就感觉很熟悉。我出生的国家和我作为历史学家研究的国家很少如此明确地一致。二者都
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whiteness and Polishness
In 2019, the New York Times launched a series of articles entitled “The 1619 Project,” which argued that we should reorient our understanding of American history by using as a starting point the year when the first African slaves were sold in the territory that would become the United States.1 Not surprisingly, Donald Trump immediately countered by sponsoring “The 1776 Project,” which attempts to position the libertarian right as the heir to a long tradition of American greatness.2 A furious battle over historical memory is now being fought around these two texts, with school districts mandating that one or the other be adopted into the curriculum, depending on the political orientation dominating in any particular district.3 This was the backdrop for me when I read Adam Leszczyński’s Ludowa historia Polski (“The People’s History of Poland”), so the book felt familiar even before I noticed the references to Howard Zinn’s (1980) A People’s History of the United States. The country of my birth and the country that I study as a historian are rarely so explicitly aligned. Both
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Praktyka Teoretyczna
Praktyka Teoretyczna Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
„Na hałdach rosną ludzie”: literacka historia pogórniczych środowisk sprzymierzeńczych The Doomsday Economy: Colonial Violence, Environmental Catastrophe, and Burning Tires in Palestine Dialektyka natury i społeczeństwa przeciwko monizmowi. Esej recenzyjny z „Marx in the Anthropocene” Kohei Saita (2023, Cambridge University Press) Francuski atom a kapitał symboliczny Bourdieu Rewolucyjne siły reprodukcji? Esej recenzyjny wokół książki Stefanii Barci, „Forces of Reproduction: Notes for a Counter-Hegemonic Anthropocene” (2020, Cambridge University Press)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1